Showing Cleavage Then Covering It- Why?

I do not encounter this. I’m not ugly, but I rarely get cornered, only occasionally get catcalls and the like. I do catch grins, compliments, and every now and then a stranger will flirt, but nothing scary about that. Only felt real fear three times in my life, all three times because the men followed me in parking lots. I’ve no reason to complain about general attention from men. But the occasional forward and ill-mannered hovering peeker is tiresome. But there aren’t many men that clueless or foolish at work or out on the loose.

Speaking to the collective horndog you:

The hovering and peeking thing is frequent, but as most of us have said, it’s noticable but forgettable. My only purpose in responding to this discussion was to explain that no, we aren’t inviting your gaze unless we are interested in you. We will deny your access and cut off your vantage points if you make us uncomfortable. But most of the time, clothing adjustments probably aren’t about you. Unless you are our date or perspective date, our clothing choices aren’t about you.

I’ve been reading though the arguments on this thread earlier and then I went on twitter. #CleavageAppreciationDay was trending. :stuck_out_tongue:

Anyway, I’m a guy but I’ll have to agree with most of the women on here. It’s about showing respect to others, and if it’s at the work place, professionalism.

The idea, FP, is that for me personally, you get tired of the bullshit. It’s like a war with no end. The war to end myself being seen as a pleasure object, and instead be seen as a person. And buttoning up a bit, or wrapping my sweater a little tighter when a man inappropriately stares is just one more battle in the war.

[quote=“Fotheringay-Phipps, post:259, topic:647892”]

My comment was about another person’s post. What that person said was:I disagree with that specific point. I think boobs can be distracting for quite a lot of mature men. And the notion that this cannot be the case has no logical basis.

QUOTE]

I think this is the point you are really trying to make, correct?

We (speaking for the moment for the women in this thread) think that cleavage/breasts should not be a distraction for mature men. You think that it can be. Fine, we have all stated what we each think.

The difference appears to be in a connotation we are each applying to “mature”. To me (perhaps all of us posting in this thread from a woman’s perspective), mature means that someone has the mental and emotional maturity to take simple commonplace occurances in stride, without being hung up on them.

I am not sure what your connotation of mature is, but certainly, the meaning we are applying is one that reflects an emotional level of maturity, not just age based. There are certainly older men who are not very mature, and thus not able to react to a woman’s cleavage in a discreet manner. To our minds (again if I may speak for the group), this automatically disqualifies them as mature.

YMMV.

Of course you wouldn’t. You’re a real piece of work.

I live in NYC, which I admit does not help. Incident number one was in Philadelphia. The other one was in DC.

When I lived in smaller towns, I did encounter this less fequently.

Speaking as a man that finds breasts appealing, I find that it is not that difficult to ignore my baser instincts and look at a woman’s face when talking to her. Wouldn’t you be a bit put off by a female co-worker leering at your crotch? I know I would.

Finding something distracting does not imply that you’re hung up on them.

There appears to be some ongoing confusion here.

Someone who finds women’s cleavage distracting can also be someone who can “react to a woman’s cleavage in a discreet manner”. It’s just that such a person would find it annoying to one degree or another to have to do this. (ISTR that this was the original point of the whole “distracting” line of thought, though I could be wrong about that.)

[Re “maturity”, I think you’re running a risk of creating a No True Scotsman situation if you define it too narrowly. But that may not be relevant here.]

That’s fine but doesn’t relate to my point.

Perhaps it would be illustrative to imagine a guy who is trying to quit smoking or alcohol or whatever, and now finds himself in a situation where these were readily available and on hand. Yeah, he’s not completely helpless and drawn to ingest them, and certainly the right thing for the guy to do would be to avoid them. But he would probably be more comfortable if they weren’t right there in front of him.

That’s what I think is meant by “distraction”. That’s what I mean, anyway.

No shit they can be distracting and no shit they are appealing. No one is disputing that. Her point was made in the context of this going on at work, that a mature man should get over it and choose not to be distracted in a professional work environment when women wear anything tighter than a California Raisin costume. You disagree with that?

ISTM that a lot of people are disputing that.

No.

And to clarify the “cornering” has happened perhaps 5 times in my life.

General leering and inappropriate remarks? Yeah, pretty much daily if I am alone. If I am not alone, it happens pretty much never.

What is truly interesting is when the man (and yes, it is always a man IME) thinks you are alone. They then realize you are not, and then skulk away.

:smack:

I just…can’t.

The female body is not a drug. You have no rights to leer/comment/whatever at my body. NONE.

I own my body. If I want to reveal a bit of my “drug”, I will. It is not an invitation. The only one who has rights when it comes to my body is me, and you infringing on them if you are acting inappropriately.

The most horrifying thing to me is not that there are men out there like this…it is how many if them there are. Maybe I encounter them more often because I am in NYC.

The second most horrifying thing is that women just got compared to consumable intimate objects, the sort meant for pleasure.

A) first world problem
B) not my problem
C) tough shit
D) grow up
E) all of the above

May I suggest E?

Calm down. It was just an illustration of what is meant by “distraction”.

Or don’t calm down, come to think of it. Whatever you want.

ETA: that was to madamoiselle

Whatever works for you.

This just reemphasizing even sven’s fantastic point from the last page.

She’s just being hysterical, amirite?

Am I being shrill yet? Am I, am I?? :eek:

What on earth were you expecting with that ridiculous comment?

<Scarlett> “Oh, you poor, poor distractable man. Whatever were we thinking with our buttons and cardigans? Why, we sure never meant to derail your train of thought at work. My goodness, however will we make reparations? Would you like a dollar? Tomorrow I’ll be sure and wear a sweatshirt. No, two! I’ll wear two sweatshirts so poor widdle you can focus on work. I do hope you will forgive me for my trespasses, my wanton ways, and my ample bosom! I don’t know how you men get a thing done what with 52% of the population daring to sprout breasts. Why, last week I wore a v-neck and these things caused a car wreck! People coulda died! I’m a real hazard, I tell ya, I should just stay at home to cook and clean.”</Scarlett>

That was supposed to be inanimate, sorry.