# Slut Shaming

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [August 25, 2016, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882 "2016-08-25T04:52:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/81 "2016-08-27T15:44:20Z")

</div>

Slut is a pejorative, so if you decide that someone’s a slut, knock yourself out, there’s nothing wrong with slut shaming. Does anybody but racists complain about racist shaming?

The argument should be over the definition of slut.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![up\_the\_junction](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f1d935/32.png) [@up\_the\_junction](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/up_the_junction)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/82 "2016-08-27T16:04:02Z")

</div>

There’s no argument to have.

Back in the day female virtue had a market value. Turns out _we_ don’t own them or the right to ‘value’ them anymore.

Argument over: we grew up.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/83 "2016-08-27T16:16:25Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> Show me where I said it was 100% assigned to the women.
> 
> Yes, of course we internalize what society says. That’s the point. Some of the messages are horribly damaging and we should work really hard to change the conversation.

Well, it’s easy to blame the third-party in an instance of adultery rather than the person you love and are married to.

So maybe we should work really hard to change human nature…just like walking around drunk in scant clothing at 3am and being _shocked_ that bad dudes are out looking to take advantage of you.

I don’t know that billions of conversations will change the basic moral failings of humans. It seems like a cop-out to deny realities and ask for more discourse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/84 "2016-08-27T16:18:50Z")

</div>

> [@up\_the\_junction](#):
>
> There’s no argument to have.
> 
> Back in the day female virtue had a market value. Turns out _we_ don’t own them or the right to ‘value’ them anymore.
> 
> Argument over: we grew up.

If you don’t think men still value a woman’s (relative) sexual sanctity you apparently didn’t grow up. Men typically don’t want to marry sexually promiscuous women.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/85 "2016-08-27T16:26:05Z")

</div>

> [@DonLogan](#):
>
> Slut is a pejorative, so if you decide that someone’s a slut, knock yourself out, there’s nothing wrong with slut shaming. Does anybody but racists complain about racist shaming?
> 
> The argument should be over the definition of slut.

Slut shaming is not the shaming of sluts. It’s suggesting someone engaged in “slutty” behavior in order to shame them. It’s the implication that their behavior was slutty so they should be ashamed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![octopus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/octopus/32/3716_2.png) [@octopus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/octopus)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/86 "2016-08-27T16:42:16Z")

</div>

> [@up\_the\_junction](#):
>
> There’s no argument to have.
> 
> Back in the day female virtue had a market value. Turns out _we_ don’t own them or the right to ‘value’ them anymore.
> 
> Argument over: we grew up.

Behavior, including sexual behavior, does signal value. When someone enters a relationship with someone else it’s based on something right? Part of that something is how a person behaves.

Signalling theory is extraordinarily important to understand in society. You are continuously judged by your speech, your dress, how you accessorize, your manners etc. Why should sexual behavior be excluded?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/87 "2016-08-27T16:48:33Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> Slut shaming is not the shaming of sluts.

Well, whoever invented the phrase made a big mistake then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/88 "2016-08-27T16:55:29Z")

</div>

> [@IvoryTowerDenizen](#):
>
> Slut shaming is not the shaming of sluts. It’s suggesting someone engaged in “slutty” behavior in order to shame them. It’s the implication that their behavior was slutty so they should be ashamed.

I don’t think most of the posters in this thread are going to understand this. They think sluts are a real thing, a species all unto themselves, a subset of women who don’t even need to be defined…we all know who they are and what they look like because we’ve been whispering about them since middle school.

If the average man who puts stock in these notions only knew how many “sluts” there were…lol, their heads would explode. They could be married to them and don’t even know!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 5:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/89 "2016-08-27T17:19:40Z")

</div>

My objection is to the phrase itself.

Fruit smoothie = smoothie made with fruit.

If you ask someone who’s against slut shaming if there is such a thing as a slut, probably most of them would either say no, or they would say, well, a lot of people are getting called sluts who aren’t. And so the latter group allows for the possibility that labeling someone a slut might be appropriate, and additionally that it’s derogatory.

I don’t disagree with the description of the behavior that gets labeled _ **as being** _ slut shaming.

But the phrase itself is just another example of dumb linguistics courtesy of the internet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 5:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/90 "2016-08-27T17:24:27Z")

</div>

Think of it as hyphenated. Slut-shaming: the act of shaming someone by implying they’re a slut.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/91 "2016-08-27T17:39:59Z")

</div>

> [@you\_with\_the\_face](#):
>
> If the average man who puts stock in these notions only knew how many “sluts” there were…lol, their heads would explode. They could be married to them and don’t even know!

Well, that’s the point, isn’t it? For some men, the idea that they can’t control women’s sexual behavior is intolerable and infuriating.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![up\_the\_junction](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f1d935/32.png) [@up\_the\_junction](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/up_the_junction)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/92 "2016-08-27T20:12:22Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> If you don’t think men still value a woman’s (relative) sexual sanctity you apparently didn’t grow up. Men typically don’t want to marry sexually promiscuous women.

Maybe if you want to live in a Little House on the Prairie in the last century.

Or are you some kind of Islamic fundamentalist?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![up\_the\_junction](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f1d935/32.png) [@up\_the\_junction](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/up_the_junction)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/93 "2016-08-27T20:16:00Z")

</div>

> [@octopus](#):
>
> Signalling theory is extraordinarily important to understand in society. You are continuously judged by your speech, your dress, how you accessorize, your manners etc. Why should sexual behavior be excluded?

You’re making a conscious choice to judge based on … what? Gender privilege.

I would expect any modern women to tell you exactly what you can do with that.

I have no idea where you guys live or your work/social mix but you don’t get away with shit like this where I am.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimmy_Chitwood)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/94 "2016-08-27T20:33:30Z")

</div>

> [@DonLogan](#):
>
> But the phrase itself is just another example of dumb linguistics courtesy of the internet.

Agreed.

Also, did you know dog whistles aren’t made out of dogs?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/95 "2016-08-27T20:34:32Z")

</div>

> [@up\_the\_junction](#):
>
> Maybe if you want to live in a Little House on the Prairie in the last century.
> 
> Or are you some kind of Islamic fundamentalist?

I think **Stringbean** ’s comment is accurate. Many men still consider promiscuity to be a negative quality in women (\*if \*a woman is promiscuous). Attacking \*\*Stringbean \*\*for pointing out that fact is ad hominem; shooting the messenger.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![IvoryTowerDenizen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ivorytowerdenizen/32/17937_2.png) [@IvoryTowerDenizen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/IvoryTowerDenizen)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/96 "2016-08-27T20:41:01Z")

</div>

But it’s an attitude worth trying to address. One of the ways we address it is recognizing its underlying assumptions that are unfair to women, shine light on them, and start changing the dialog. Reducing slut-shaming helps to change those attitudes.

Wasn’t too long ago that a divorced woman was seen as tainted and morally suspect. That attitude was able to be changed over time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/f475e1/32.png) [@Jimmy\_Chitwood](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jimmy_Chitwood)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/97 "2016-08-27T20:41:25Z")

</div>

That’s not what ad hominem means, and you don’t get to speak for men in general about the “sexual sanctity” of women.

For fuck’s sake. You know what sanctity means, right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DonLogan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/51bf81/32.png) [@DonLogan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DonLogan)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 8:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/98 "2016-08-27T20:55:24Z")

</div>

> [@Jimmy\_Chitwood](#):
>
> Agreed.
> 
> Also, did you know dog whistles aren’t made out of dogs?

Of course they aren’t, that would be cannibalism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![up\_the\_junction](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/f1d935/32.png) [@up\_the\_junction](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/up_the_junction)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 9:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/99 "2016-08-27T21:21:56Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> I think **Stringbean** ’s comment is accurate. Many men still consider promiscuity to be a negative quality in women (\*if \*a woman is promiscuous). Attacking \*\*Stringbean \*\*for pointing out that fact is ad hominem; shooting the messenger.

“Many men” of your age, demographic and sense of entitlement.

A lot of old white guys support foreign wars as well. Thankfully the world is changing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [August 27, 2016, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882/100 "2016-08-27T22:12:55Z")

</div>

> [@up\_the\_junction](#):
>
> “Many men” of your age, demographic and sense of entitlement.
> 
> A lot of old white guys support foreign wars as well. Thankfully the world is changing.

Indeed. Millenials will have [fewer sex partners](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/05/06/why-aren-t-millennials-sleeping-around.html) than did the old white guys of yore:

> [@Article](#):
>
> A new report published Tuesday in the Archives of Sexual Behavior shows that millennials will have sex with fewer people than the immediately previous generations.  
> “Number of sexual partners increased steadily between the G.I.s [born 1901-1924) and 1960s-born GenX’er and then dipped among millennials,” the study notes. Take this for a contrast: Americans born in the 1950s had sex with 11.68 people on average during a lifetime while millennials will average 8.26.

Seems the stridency of the women’s sexual liberation movement is starting to show its strains. Or maybe we’re just turning into Islamic fundamentalists.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/slut-shaming/763882.md?page=6)
