Hateful?
Good. Use your aggressive feelings, boy. Let the hate flow through you.
Er, next time, bring relevant facts.
And getting safer all the time, as the main threat (overreaching government) is increasingly hemmed in by power-to-the-people privacy technologies.
Fear is the path to the Derp Side.
If you really want to derail the Republican Party, you need to do a quick 180 and push the Democrats to start straightening up and putting some serious effort into curtailing the government’s Big-Brother and race-relations abuses. Otherwise, somebody you probably won’t like will continue to pick up the issues and run with them… maybe all the way to the White House.
very much so - here is just ONE example
Well, if the world inside your head was full of people trying to steal your kidneys, you’d be hateful too.
“Overreaching government” is an oxymoron.
If the American people decide that electing a segregationist will solve their race problems, it won’t be my fault for supporting the party with the far better record.
What’s hateful about that? Is there some amount of love I ought to be expressing for criminals?
This statement is an emission from the sort of fuel that burns to generate oxymorons.
No, no, no; the reason it will be your fault is that you are acting as an enabler, relieving the pressure upon the party to align itself with the pro-privacy and pro-equality views of the public. Please try to keep up with the class.
The Democratic party is ‘anti-equality’? Since when? How would an avowed segregationist be more pro-equality?
This is in the context of the Democratic Party being much too soft on your sort of “the police are always right” nonsense. PTtKUWtC.
Hey, now. Say what you will about Smapti, but he is already plenty down with the sickness.
I don’t want to believe he’s not trolling at this point.
I don’t think he is trolling. I truly believe he is a fascist. In his world, the ends always justify the means and citizens are of no importance to the state except maybe as fuel to burn.
The good of the citizenry is the reason the state exists and the reason that it must possess the authority to deal with those that have no respect for the social contract and the expectations of human behavior in a civilized society. When the state is too afraid of its own citizens to stop them from openly breaking the law, the result is anarchy.
Now we’re getting somewhere.
Let’s start with one specific example of this phenomenon, and see how it might be addressed. What particular steps need to be to reinforce the state’s courage so that James Clapper can be clapped into the hoosegow for perjury?