Alright, I’ll modify the hypothetical to be idiot-compatible:
You are on a busy street in the evening in NYC. A cop (or someone in a cop’s uniform) grabs you by the elbow and steers you to the mouth of an alley. You are not yet in the alley, just in front of it. No one is in the alley but a sleeping hobo. People are walking and driving down the street. The cop says, softly, “kill that hobo”, and holds out a knife, handle-first, towards you.
Wrong again. The slaver government is declaring happiness, talents, and social benefit to be irrelevant. Ergo, the government is wrong, and you are an idiot (for failing to correctly note this fact), a coward (for acquiescing) and a fascist (for willingly acquiescing).
Come clean. Admit that this thread is just an exercise in trollish performance art.
And I stated my opinion. And my opinion contradicts with the opinion of that hypothetical government. My opinion is not inherently truer than theirs simply because it is mine.
You pretty much are, by insisting that my personal beliefs about how government should operate conform to all possible permutations of how governments do operate.
I do have the might to resist this person who is not acting in a legitimate display of authority. I have the ability to hit the gas, call 911, and inform them that I am being chased by a police officer who has ordered me to commit suicide. More police will join the chase and I will surrender to them and be arrested (which I will deserve for resisting an officer), and ultimately the dash/body cams will confirm my story and I will be released.
Possibly, yes, though at this point in his career I figure people just fall over to try and gift him guitars. And of course the surgeon doesn’t buy the heart he’s plugging into your chest.
So I guess what I’m saying is : what the fuck is your point ?
My opinions are not the “fundamental stated bases” of anything. They are my opinions, nothing more. They don’t form the backbone of any fundamental law of the universe. Noone is going to suddenly convert like the naïve heathen in a Jack Chick tract just because I tell them that they’re not conforming to what I believe they ought to.
You stated that it’s wrong, which contradicts your statements about your moral guideline. And when I pointed that out, you said that you were just talking about what the governments would say. So which is it? Is it you’re opinion that it’s morally wrong for a slave to try and free themselves, or for a German bureacrat to allow a Jewish family to escape?
Yes you can, unless you’re an incredible weakling. For the purposes of the hypothetical, your physical strength is average, and the cop’s is not significantly greater.
If you’re going to just concede the description in the thread title, we might be able to wrap things up. Unless it’s just too much fun to continue pointing and laughing.