Okay. Murderers are an existential threat to me and any other individual. If I came up with a plan that would kill all murderers, but would also kill 10 innocent people for every murderer, would you say that was okay thing to do?
Or would you realize that there is no practical way to use violence to eliminate the existence of all murderers?
That’s where we are here. Except I’m being very conservative with the numbers of Palestinians being killed or which will be killed based on Israel’s current plans. They’re using weapons that aren’t designed to be used in populated places.
While eliminating Hamas is a viable long term goal, it is not a viable short term one. The US spend 20 years trying to eliminate Al Qaeda with military force. What happened?
The whole idea that they need to eliminate Hamas first is fucking stupid. It only justified a forever war.
The actual goal of a proper military action would be to significantly destroy their fighting abilities, and get started working on fixing their ridiculous intelligence failure so they’ll actually next time know ahead of time that something is being planned stop it before the attack actually happens.
Long term, you need a fucking two state solution. Make it where Hamas doesn’t need to exist. Slowly deradicalize them until they’re just a normal government. You can’t beat an ideological war with violence.
@WalterBishop: I had intended to make a less angry post in reply to you and your more reasonable question. But I got distracted when I saw this angering post. Still, I think you can get most of what I was going to say from this. The elimination of Hamas is not a reasonable or necessary short term goal.
Because every person from Hamas they kill, they create at least two more new recruits. Eliminating Hamas is a decades long thing, and is not in any way a reasonable point to use to end the war.
And, whenever Israel does stop, Hamas will not be gone, any more than Al Qaeda or ISIS were gone. And yet, as it stands right now, millions of Palestinians will have either died from the way too big bombs that Israel is using or from starvation.
It’s not fucking hard not to block aid, like Israel did. How can any of you argue that that was a necessary thing? How was it necessary to create a famine that is currently present in northern Gaza? (Note real questions, BTW. It isn’t.)
I hate this argument that Israel is just doing what they had to do, when literally everyone has been saying what they could have done. Fucking Biden, who everyone thinks is pro-Israel, was telling Israel what they should do. Argh!