My reading skills apparently do not extend to finding anything where Hans Blix said he can’t prove a negative. Either my eyes are bad or he never said such a thing. What would clear the problem up is a citation from you in which Hans Blix says that he cannot prove that Iraq had disarmed, or something similar.
I’m happy to provide multiple cites in which Blix says that, with sufficient time and cooperation, he would be able to determine whether Iraq has disarmed.
Seriously, Elvis, why is it taken as such an affront when I say that a few of your claims ought to be backed up with citations?