# So factual jr modding is OK now? **URL:** \ **Category:** About This Message Board\ **Created:** [July 19, 2014, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512 "2014-07-19T04:42:52Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 105
**Author:** ![Joey\_P](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/919ad9/32.png) [@Joey\_P](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Joey_P)\ **Post date:** [July 22, 2014, 12:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512/105 "2014-07-22T00:54:23Z")
> [@Banquet\_Bear](#): > > …Czarcasm responded to questions asked by the OP, he responded to other posters, I didn’t see anything excessive there. It’s hard to see this as not being excessive… > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/6): > > Please cite any of these so-called “facts” that you wish to discuss. For example, it has been said by _who_ that 1 in every 100 of us are psychopaths? > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/9): > > At least _one_ of us understands the difference between “potentiality” and “reality”. > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/12): > > Czarcasm, if you were to correctly read my post i did not mention anything as ‘fact’, merely something that ‘has been said’. > I was trying to make the point that most of us now recognize that there are many functioning psychopaths within society, something that interests me. I do not pretend to know much on the subject, so please forgive me ‘Czarcasm’ for any future posts that do not contain accurate info. > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/14): > > Again, said by who? > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/15): > > Why exactly does this matter, if you understand the general point i was trying to make? It could be some bloke at a bar, it was a glib statement used to make a point. > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/16): > > It matters who said it if we are to consider it as a possible statement of fact. > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/18): > > I never asked for it to be considered a statement of fact, please read my previous post again. I think you want to reconsider using the word ‘we’, I think other people have read and understood my post as intended. > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/26): > > The OP is asking for opinions based on unattributed(and wrong) definitions and “facts”, and I just happened to notice what forum he posted this thread in. > Did you? > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/29): > > Since “psychopath” is a legal term rather than a medical term, and since legalities change from location to location, and since none of the laws that deal with “psychopathy” as they describe it get into its permanency there can be no factual answer to this question. Calls for individual opinions, probably best suited for Great Debates or IMHO? > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/34): > > Thanks for trying. > Where did you get that “80%” stat from **jtur88**? IMO, the OP would have been best off asking for the thread to be closed and re-writing it with that line left out (since it was just a throwaway line), then reporting Czarcasm if he brings it up again in the new thread. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512)._