# So factual jr modding is OK now?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [July 19, 2014, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512 "2014-07-19T04:42:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Merneith](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/57b2e6/32.png) [@Merneith](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Merneith)\
**Post date:** [July 19, 2014, 3:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512/12 "2014-07-19T15:21:33Z")

</div>

I fully support keeping GQ a opinion-hostile zone. In fact, I think we could all stand to be a little more proactive about it. If an OP is based on a tenuous conclusion drawn from a bunch of unsupported statements, then everyone should have been asking for cites. There’s plenty of other places, even right here at the Dope, where unsupported musings can take place.

But while I’m being all fascist here, I must point out -

> [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/6):
>
> For example, it has been said by who that 1 in every 100 of us are psychopaths?

It has been said by _whom_ …

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512)._
