# So factual jr modding is OK now?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [July 19, 2014, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512 "2014-07-19T04:42:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 147

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fenris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fenris/32/498_2.png) [@Fenris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fenris)\
**Post date:** [July 22, 2014, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512/147 "2014-07-22T16:44:49Z")

</div>

Here’s one from Marley saying the same thing

> [@Clarification, Tom?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/clarification-tom/631184/8):
>
> I have to agree with **tomndebb** here, although I understand the frustration. If someone makes a claim and can’t or won’t produce a cite, asking over and over and over doesn’t accomplish anything other than derailing the thread. Ask, say, two times and let the failure to produce a cite speak for itself or say “I see you still can’t come up with that cite” and let it go.

And he also (correctly, IMO) points out that it derails the thread. Which, until post 16 of this thread, was against the rules. Now deliberately badgering a poster for an answer is “an interesting digression”

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512)._