# So factual jr modding is OK now? **URL:** \ **Category:** About This Message Board\ **Created:** [July 19, 2014, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512 "2014-07-19T04:42:52Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 53
**Author:** ![Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/left_hand_of_dorkness/32/7156_2.png) [@Left\_Hand\_of\_Dorkness](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Left_Hand_of_Dorkness)\ **Post date:** [July 21, 2014, 1:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512/53 "2014-07-21T13:25:55Z")
> [@Czarcasm](#): > > Your information did not back up the claim the OP made, which I pointed out. 1 in 100 people being potential psychopaths is not 1 in 100 people being psychopaths. So maybe the OP, instead of saying 1 in 100 people are psychopaths, should have said, hold up, > [@Psychopaths](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/psychopaths/693392/1): > > In fact, it has been said that 1 in every 100 of us are psychopaths, or at the very least have psychopathic traits. [emphasis added] Your desire to win the nitpickery prize apparently blinded you to the actual claim. In fact, in the post you JUST RESPONDED TO, I pointed out that your paraphrase was inaccurate, and you STILL didn’t go back to see what the actual claim was. > [@](#): > > edited to add: Please note that the OP had no idea what _his_ source was. Great, so that’s another point on the scoresheet for you. Who cares? This isn’t a contest, and your treating it as one is unhelpful. The goal, rather than winning points, should be to address the question with information, not with irrelevant nitpickery questions. --- _[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-factual-jr-modding-is-ok-now/693512)._