# So if Mossad used UK passports whats the correct response?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-if-mossad-used-uk-passports-whats-the-correct-response/529459>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 18, 2010, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-if-mossad-used-uk-passports-whats-the-correct-response/529459 "2010-02-18T12:33:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 240

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [February 20, 2010, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-if-mossad-used-uk-passports-whats-the-correct-response/529459/240 "2010-02-20T04:56:29Z")

</div>

> [@FinnAgain](#):
>
> It’s an absurd point based on nothing more than radical relativism run amok. And it is, naturally, being selectively applied. Some nations (like Iran) murder their gays as a matter of policy. Does that mean when we say that murdering gays is wrong we’re just need help to find our noses since, after all, someone disagrees and we can’t possibly make our minds up if someone disagrees!

After reading so many of your posts, I see that two things pop up often: you refer to other’s arguments, opinions, facts, and conclusions as either silly or absurd quite often, and you argue constantly that anyone who doesn’t agree with you whole-heartedly is arguing “relativism”.

I can only conclude that you operate from a position of moral absolutism, where everything you think is right is right, and what you think is wrong is wrong, and you will brook no disagreement. At least, that’s what I get from your posts in this thread.

As such, I can see why you ignored my last questions directed to you.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-if-mossad-used-uk-passports-whats-the-correct-response/529459)._
