BUFFY SEASON 4 and ANGEL SEASON 1 SPOILERS TO FOLLOW:
Okay, Buffy Season 4 is finally getting really good. We made great progress this weekend:
**
Doomed
A New Man
The I in Team
Goodbye Iowa
This Year’s Girl (Part One of Two)
Who Are You (Part Two of Two)**
I still feel kinda ‘‘okay, whatever’’ about Riley, but he’s growing on me enough that I give a shit whether he lives or dies. I keep going back and forth between getting caught up in the Initiative drama and thinking it’s lame.
Now, as for Willow and her new girlfriend… obviously this girl must be a demon or something because she deliberately threw that experiment to locate nearby demonic forces. But she’s also obviously in love with Willow. And I really hope this doesn’t turn into ‘‘Joss Whedon’s attempt to use magic as a metaphor for lesbianism without actually showing chicks make out.’’ Because I would be sort of annoyed with him for not being willing to explicitly portray a lesbian relationship.
I love that in the middle of this Room 314 clusterfuck they dropped Faith into the picture. Jeez. I absolutely loved both of the Faith episodes and consider them the best of the season. I’ve always felt Faith was an incredibly believable character. She doesn’t do things out of evil so much as pure selfishness, and even her decision to do good by saving the church patrons seemed selfishly motivated. But maybe that’s sort of the point. Because I think those of us who do try to do good are selfishly motivated, in part.
Which brings us to WhyNot’s insightful comment about Angel:
[QUOTE=WhyNot]
Angel carries a surfeit of hubris. One thing that consistently pissed me off about his character is that he constantly makes life-altering decisions for other people, like this one for Buffy, instead of trusting them to make their own decisions. He thinks of her as an innocent little bunny and really works the age angle to justify not letting her decide her own lover. And the kicker is that ultimately his decisions are made not with her, but with his own adrenaline junky world savior self in mind. (Well, and, y’know, keeping the spinoff series going.) He’s still a selfish bastard wrapped in a hero disguise.
[/QUOTE]
This comment made me look more critically at his decisions. The last episodes I watched are:
Somnambulist
Expecting
She
I’ve Got You Under My Skin
The Prodigal
The Ring
I believe it’s in The Prodigal that Kate’s father is killed because of his crooked dealings. And Angel’s first instinct as she discovers the body of her father is to explain why it wasn’t his fault. Twice in the course of her total devastation he feels the need to justify his actions and explain that he’s really not a bad guy. He seems to have no concept that there are more important things in that moment than proving his worthiness. Chances are, if he had just kept his mouth shut or just held her or something she wouldn’t have retaliated in anger and told him to stay the hell away from her.
However, I think calling him a selfish bastard is oversimplifying things. It would be more apt to say that he is driven by guilt and the need to have that guilt alleviated, to the point that he can’t see straight. More than pointing to something wrong with Angel, I think his character points to the human condition. We are all inherently self-motivated people, whether we are willing to own it or not.
And as for Buffy, it’s not like he’s obligated to consider everyone’s feelings but his own. What it comes down to is whether or not he wants to be mortal. He chose not. And while he might be ‘‘working’’ that age angle to his advantage, he’s got a point. He’s 300 fucking years old screwing around with a teenager. He should have played the age card a long time ago.
As for the Angel arc in general, well… there is no arc. I’m waiting for there to be an arc. I like the episodes, individually, and I get that the purpose of them is to show Angel, Cordelia and Wesley learning to trust and rely upon one another, but I would very much like to feel like we’re moving in a certain direction. I know that will come with time. I’m just ready.