# So it seems the claim that the Oscars are snubbing black people is false

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 19, 2016, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611 "2016-01-19T19:59:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robert163](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/4af34b/32.png) [@Robert163](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robert163)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/81 "2016-01-20T00:29:58Z")

</div>

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> I have no statistics on how many movies have minority actors in high-visibility roles or minority directors. Do you?
> 
> And **Hollywood actors** have the reputation of being quite liberal. The suits who run the major studios have a long-standing reputation of being as conservative as their brethren in any other big business. I have no idea what the political breakdown is among producers or cinamatographers.

Yeah, ummm, I am kind of busy at the moment but still wanted to respond.

I thought, however, by reputation even studio people were liberals. As far as not casting minorities I thought that was a financial decision for them… if true, that is still not good. But it’s not the same as them being die hard racists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robert163](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/4af34b/32.png) [@Robert163](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robert163)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/82 "2016-01-20T00:33:12Z")

</div>

> [@slash2k](#):
>
> If there were 5 black actors nominated amongst 300 nominees, and everything else was equal, yes, this would be possible evidence of greater bias.

sorry, I’m not good at math, I still don’t get it… how is everything else “not equal”

> [@](#):
>
> However, “well, we’re only somewhat biased, instead of grossly biased” isn’t a winning argument here. If there is any sort of racial bias, the Academy is biased and needs to improve.

Yes, of course that is correct. Like, 100% agree with you on that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/83 "2016-01-20T00:35:47Z")

</div>

> [@Robert163](#):
>
> Well, the:
> 
> 29 nominations  
> 9 wins
> 
> would indicate to me that there is no bias
> 
> 3 nominations  
> 1 win
> 
> would indicate bias

Possibly. But you need to actually do the math first by comparing them to the total pool of contenders and then comparing that to whites in the same way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robert163](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/4af34b/32.png) [@Robert163](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robert163)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/84 "2016-01-20T00:38:35Z")

</div>

> [@lance\_strongarm](#):
>
> Possibly. But you need to actually do the math first by comparing them to the total pool of contenders and then comparing that to whites in the same way.

so you’ll are basically saying… well there are only a handfull of “notable” black actors so of course those few will get nominations… but as a whole, African Americans have less of a chance in movies than white people do?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/85 "2016-01-20T00:40:59Z")

</div>

> [@Robert163](#):
>
> so you’ll are basically saying… well there are only a handfull of “notable” black actors so of course those few will get nominations… but as a whole, African Americans have less of a chance in movies than white people do?

I’m saying that MIGHT be true, or it MIGHT be false, and you won’t know until you get all the data and do the math. But yeah, that’s the type of comparison needed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/86 "2016-01-20T00:44:38Z")

</div>

> [@lance\_strongarm](#):
>
> Possibly. But you need to actually do the math first by comparing them to the total pool of contenders and then comparing that to whites in the same way.

From the parallel thread in Cafe Society:

> [@another "white" Oscars - does it matter\>?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/another-white-oscars-does-it-matter/743169/145):
>
> Accepting 13% of the population being black (as cited above), then having zero of 20 nominees being black has a probability of 6.2% only slightly less than the 7.1% chance of having 5 or more black nominees as occurred in 2004 and 2006. (Zero happened 3 times out of 15 according to Robert163’s post.)

And it seems to me the math should be done for both sides of the argument.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/87 "2016-01-20T00:50:10Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I agree this is mostly an issue with the studios not creating good parts for black actors, rather than the Academy itself being racist (though that certainly adds to the problem – a majority old, white academy isn’t optimal).

This was explicitly Spike Lee’s point - \* “The Academy Awards is not where the ‘real’ battle is,” wrote Lee. “It’s in the executive office of the Hollywood studios and TV and cable networks. This is where the gate keepers decide what gets made. … This is what’s important. The gate keepers. Those with ‘the green light’ vote.”\*

Quoted in this [SFGate article](http://www.sfgate.com/movies/article/Spike-Lee-calls-for-boycott-of-lily-white-6767366.php), where film critic ( and scholar ) Mick LaSalle agreed with him and made the argument that it was really black _actresses_ that are truly seeing a dearth of quality roles.

So a bit more nuanced than just bias in the Academy, but more a systemic issue of too few black movers and shakers in the upper echelons of Hollywood to help set the agenda.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Robert163](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/4af34b/32.png) [@Robert163](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Robert163)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 12:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/88 "2016-01-20T00:51:56Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> From the parallel thread in Cafe Society:  
> And it seems to me the math should be done for both sides of the argument.

ok

I am actually going out, to the next town over to a 16 screen cinema to watch the Revenant. And, to get Sushi. Good restaurants are also limited in this small town.

Thank you to the people who participated in this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slash2k](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@slash2k](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slash2k)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 1:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/89 "2016-01-20T01:05:18Z")

</div>

> [@Robert163](#):
>
> sorry, I’m not good at math, I still don’t get it… how is everything else “not equal”

I’m saying, if the same people made the same movies and gave the same performances and faced the same competition and only 5 (instead of 29) were nominated, that would be indicative of greater bias.

If, however, different people gave different quantities and qualities of performance, then 5 may or may not be meaningful in that new context.

> [@Robert163](#):
>
> I thought, however, by reputation even studio people were liberals.

That’s not the reputation I’ve heard, but I have no firm numbers.

> [@Robert163](#):
>
> As far as not casting minorities I thought that was a financial decision for them… if true, that is still not good. But it’s not the same as them being die hard racists.

I don’t really think many (if any) are arguing diehard racism. I think, as **brickbacon** noted, that the problem may well have more to do with obliviousness and lack of concern/attention than KKK tendencies.

It has long been rumored, e.g., that movies appealing to middle-aged white men have a particularly good chance at the Oscars because so many of the voters are middle-aged white men, and they vote for what is familiar or what is personally interesting rather than what is objectively great. _Straight Outta Compton_, to name one, is not a movie whose primary demographic is middle-aged white men. If the Academy voters don’t find the movie personally appealing, do they still give equal consideration to the quality of the work, or do they dismiss it reflexively, or are they simply unaware because it’s not on their own radar, or do they actively go out of their way to snub it? Only the last of these is conscious racism, but the middle two are equally biased.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/90 "2016-01-20T01:14:10Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> From the parallel thread in Cafe Society:

Thanks. Though the better comparison is to possible contenders, as discussed above, rather than just population. Of course, that itself is a problem because contenders for nomination may be artificially low, so maybe you do both and see what happens.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![the\_diego](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/7bcc69/32.png) [@the\_diego](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/the_diego)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 4:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/91 "2016-01-20T04:42:20Z")

</div>

WAS maybe? Before Denzel Washington won in 2001, who was the last AA to win best actor and when? Clue: He played a teacher.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/c68b51/32.png) [@Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pearl_Clutching_Provocateur)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 5:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/92 "2016-01-20T05:20:16Z")

</div>

> [@Anaamika](#):
>
> I haven’t done the research but merely citing where some black actors at some point have won the award doesn’t mean to say that black actors (or Asians, no one ever gives a shit about Asians) aren’t being snubbed.
> 
> That is to say, I’d need a lot more stats.

Asians only have themselves to blame. There are a lot of Asians behind the scenes. Justin Lin. James Wan. They don’t cast Asians. My son is a professional actor. I think he gets cast because he looks very Caucasian, light brown hair with hazel eyes, but has an Asian last name.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 6:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/93 "2016-01-20T06:31:59Z")

</div>

> [@brickbacon](#):
>
> And yet, you keep repeating this misleading stat as if it means anything either way. Again, as of tomorrow, 50% of the US presidents in the past 15 years have been Black. Does that tell you ANYTHING about political bias along racial lines?

What a ridiculous comparison. Oscars are nominated every year. Presidents, every 4 years. And an incumbent president has a significant advantage to being re-elected. Honest question: do you know anything at all about statistics?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![slash2k](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/439d5e/32.png) [@slash2k](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/slash2k)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 7:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/94 "2016-01-20T07:39:29Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> What a ridiculous comparison. Oscars are nominated every year. Presidents, every 4 years. And an incumbent president has a significant advantage to being re-elected. Honest question: do you know anything at all about statistics?

Seems a pretty reasonable comparison to me. The argument is that the Academy, being overwhelmingly white, overwhelmingly picks whites as nominees (that’s “significant advantage” for being melanin-deficient). The whole point is that “29/300” ISN’T a statistically sound comparison, anymore than “2 of last 4 presidential terms,” because robert163, by looking only at nominees and ignoring the much larger universe of never-nominated, is comparing apples and kumquats, in the same way that looking at only Obama and Bush ignores the much larger universe of people in politics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 8:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/95 "2016-01-20T08:04:45Z")

</div>

I am missing your point. Percentage wise, more white actors are never nominated than black actors just like more white actors ARE nominated. I think everyone would agree that in the past, black actors were conspicuously left out but this century has seem to have had a big shift.

And 300 choices over 15 years is so obviously a better sampling size of 4 choices that I honestly have no idea where you are coming from there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![lance\_strongarm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/87869e/32.png) [@lance\_strongarm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/lance_strongarm)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 2:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/96 "2016-01-20T14:46:29Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> What a ridiculous comparison. Oscars are nominated every year. Presidents, every 4 years. And an incumbent president has a significant advantage to being re-elected. Honest question: do you know anything at all about statistics?

His point was sound, and demonstrated a knowledge of statistics.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![T.M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ad7895/32.png) [@T.M](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/T.M)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/97 "2016-01-20T15:48:59Z")

</div>

The danger here is that nominee’s will be chosen because of their colour and not because of the quality of the work performed

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/98 "2016-01-20T15:51:01Z")

</div>

> [@DrCube](#):
>
> I didn’t say that any were? I said zero nominations is a problem. It could be a problem with the Academy. It could be a problem with the studios. It could be a problem with the culture in Hollywood. It could be a problem in acting schools where they just don’t seem to attract black talent. It could be that the American people just don’t want to pay to see black actors. It could be that black parents don’t encourage or value acting as a hobby or career. It _could_ be a statistical blip that will go away next year.

And it doesn’t have to be any one of these alone, and it doesn’t have to be a big bias. If there’s a minor bias in selecting scripts with roles black actors could potentially play, and a minor bias in casting black actors, and a minor bias in putting forward those actors for nominations, and a minor bias in nominating those put forward, and a minor bias in selecting a winner…it all adds up. Winning wouldn’t be an insurmountable obstacle but it would certainly be much harder to achieve for a black actor compared to a white one. And of course there’s the audience bias against minority actors (see: the kerfuffle over Mr Boyega), which will reinforce all those biases.

Personally I think the plan to reform the membership criteria for SAG will help, but a bigger help would be in casting more black actors in roles where the race of the actor isn’t material to the role.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anaamika](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/5f9b8f/32.png) [@Anaamika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anaamika)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 3:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/99 "2016-01-20T15:54:33Z")

</div>

> [@Pearl\_Clutching\_Provocateur](#):
>
> Asians only have themselves to blame. There are a lot of Asians behind the scenes. Justin Lin. James Wan. They don’t cast Asians. My son is a professional actor. I think he gets cast because he looks very Caucasian, light brown hair with hazel eyes, but has an Asian last name.

rant omitted because what’s the fucking point

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tread](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/53a042/32.png) [@Tread](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tread)\
**Post date:** [January 20, 2016, 4:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611/100 "2016-01-20T16:03:10Z")

</div>

2 years is such a small sample, it doesn’t really tell us anything.

Also if we are saying 0 out of 5 in a category proves bias… then if 1 was nominated and we have 20% of the nominees are black, with 13% population… does that prove bias towards blacks?

Of course it doesn’t, but trying to prove a point either way based on such a small sampling proves nothing.

There may be bias… but it may be that in this 2 year run, the Academy felt that the top 5 artists in each category, none happened to be black.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611.md?page=4)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-it-seems-the-claim-that-the-oscars-are-snubbing-black-people-is-false/743611.md?page=6)
