So much for more dollar coins.

Alternatively, you can take your collection of all 50 state quarters ($12.50) and do the same thing. That’s fifty coins – and fifty of the largest denomination at that–to buy a cheap meal for two people, which just goes to show how exceptional our country really is.

pulykamell, I did forget about gumball machines, but it doesn’t matter. In twenty years you’ll probably need a dollar and the machines will have bill acceptors.

U.S. currency is boring. It needs more variety- 15, 75, 250, and 500 dollar bills would be fun. Two dollar bills should be forced into circulation every way possible. Fifty cent pieces should be reintroduced along with one, two, and five dollar coins. Mill coins should, at long last, be minted. All of this should be done by force of law, with a company I’ll create having the sole right to produce and sell the new cash drawers containing the proper compartments.

Why dimes? BTW I think the dime is a good candidate for the lowest value coin.

Either that or they’ll have to change their name to the “March of Quarters”.

Movie theaters already incorporate the sales tax into the cost of their concessions; no reason it couldn’t be done elsewhere.

I read somewhere that the American penny is the least valuable lowest-denomination coin among the largest economies. So perhaps we might use national pride as an incentive to get rid of it. (“Do you want to be the country with the wimpiest small coin?”)

Says who? If I’m selling something, I’d round up. :slight_smile:

Having dimes and quarters with no nickels is a problem. You can’t round to the nearest dime, since a person can pay with a quarter, and you can’t give them 15 cents change. If you round to a quarter dollar, a person can pay with 3 dimes, and you can’t give 5 cents change.

So, if you ditch the nickel, you have to get rid of either the dime or the quarter along with it.

Says the Feds. If they ditch the penny, there WILL be a law stating exactly how you may and may not round your transactions.

If we dump the penny and nickel, dimes may be ok for the lowest coin if we also dump the quarter. However, given the current value of the dime, I don’t think our transactions need to be rounded to that level of specificity. IMHO, the quarter would be better. So by keeping dimes, we aren’t getting our money’s worth and we would be paying to make coins to maintain a level of specificity that’s too low. So, I say our currency should look like this:

COINS
0.25
0.50
1.00

BILLS
2 (as a paper note for now to keep the dollar bill whiners at bay)
5
10
20
50
100

Says I. I run the store across the street, I got a better deal on the product than you, and I’m going to undersell you by five cents.

IOW, there is such a thing as price competition.

I think that train pulled out of the station thirty years ago, or more. Wimpiest small coin, wimpiest small note, we got your wimpy right here.

I think it’s already been answered, but here’s my answer. It’s a two part answer: Part 1 is that prices will not change on average. Part 2 is that even if they did (which they won’t), they will not do so enough to care about.

Part 1: The only thing that’s going to be rounded are the totals in the transaction. There are plenty of fair rounding algorithms, so on average the price paid will not change. If it somehow happens that the rounding rules are not required by law (I’d bet they will be) and a store always rounds things up, then you can just not go there. The idea that actual prices would change (rather than just the total being rounded) based on the coinage available is just wrong. Prices are set via supply and demand, not the monetary value of various coins.

Part 2: We already round things to the penny. No one cares that they get charged $0.25 when they buy half a pound of something that costs $0.49/lb. We’ve been rounding things to the penny since we discontinued the half-cent in 1857. At the time it was discontinued, the half-cent was worth more than $0.05, adjusted for inflation. The absolute nightmare scenario of losing 4 cents per transaction is simply not worth worrying about. It’s like going to a different gas station because their gas is 1/10 of a penny less.

I grumbled about the loonie up here when it was announced a decade ago. But after a year of reflection it costs the governmnet (you and I) less to print money, that’s probably not a bad idea.

It’s also good way to save petty cash at home as well, I have a large jar where I dump my change into. The last time I rolled it up and brought it to the bank I had about a $800 in change. Put that in my savings account please.

It’s also handy if you live in urban areas, a lot of machines exchange services and goods for coins.

I think the next denomination we should get rid of is the penny.

Cite?

From the New York Times of December 31, 1991:

For the coin haters, under this system, the only time you would need a coin to make a whole dollar figure is $1 and $3.

$4 = $2 x 2
$5 = $5 x 1
$6 = $2 x 3
$7 = $5 x 1 + $2 x 1
$8 = $2 x 4
$9 = $5 x 1 + $2 x 2

To make up for the fact you now need a coin to get $1 and $3, you no longer have to deal with pennies, nickels, and dimes.

$0.84 is now 8 coins. Under the proposed system, this amount would round down to $0.75, which is only 2 coins.

$0.89 is now 8 coins. Under the proposed system, this amount would round up to $1, which is only 1 coin.

Another cite, this time from CBS News’ 60 Minutes:

A decade ago? Try 25 years! I was in the post office today and they had a little display of the 25th-anniversary loonie…

Agreed.

A third cite, this time from an academic paper, “The Economic Implications of Price Rounding” by Steven Meester:

They certainly are - figures here - like the Presidential coins most nobody wants them.

Planet Money had a good podcast this week on the whole dollar coin situation which you can listen to here.