[QUOTE=ParentalAdvisory]
These days, I tend to look at buying in the energy sector like this (or any “hot” stock/sector):
Today, you see a car that you want that is for sale and is priced at $5,000. You want to wait to see what it’ll be tomorrow.
Tomorrow comes and the car is now $5200, not too bad but it is increasing. You decide to hold off.
On the third day, the car is going for $6,000! Wow! “It must be a good car if it’s priced so high!” you say to your self.
On the fourth day, you see it’s $6,800.
On the fifth day, you decide to buy it at $7,200 before you lose out on any money in the coming days.
Anybody in there right mind wouldn’t do this with a car, why would they do it with stocks? That is how I view market timing and the misinformation about buying into the hype of something because someone else is. Sadly, this stuff is discussed around the water cooler everyday in related to “smart investing”.
[/QUOTE]
Exactly right. I used to pick my own stocks, based on what I read or just on a hunch. I failed miserably (big surprise). Once I came to the realization that a) I don’t know enough, and b) I don’t have time to do all the research, I gave Navellier a one-year try, figuring I couldn’t do any worse. I went from making $2500 to making $43,000, which speaks pretty damn loudly to me. And it’s not bullshit stocks or penny stocks, it’s companies with sound financials like Apple, Lockheed Martin, Monsanto, etc. He tells you when to buy, when to hold, and when to sell. All I hear from my 401(k) funds “management” is deafening silence while they rake in the handling fees.

