# So, why vote for Clinton?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [September 29, 2016, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225 "2016-09-29T18:18:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RitterSport](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rittersport/32/6326_2.png) [@RitterSport](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RitterSport)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/101 "2016-10-01T14:13:08Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> You’re wrong.
> 
> As are you.

OK, so can we then assume that you’ve been convinced that there are very good reasons to vote for Clinton (and not just against Trump)? Could we ask you to summarize those reasons based on your reading of all the points made in this thread?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![don\_t\_ask](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e68b1a/32.png) [@don\_t\_ask](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/don_t_ask)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 2:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/102 "2016-10-01T14:56:50Z")

</div>

If there were more old timers like me that had read [_Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ’72_](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_and_Loathing_on_the_Campaign_Trail_%2772) there may be more thought about what actually gets achieved, and when, by lesser evil voting.

[QUOTE=Hunter S. Thompson]  
That’s the real issue this time,” he said. “Beating Nixon. It’s hard to even guess how much damage those bastards will do if they get in for another four years.”

The argument was familiar, I had even made it myself, here and there, but I was beginning to sense something very depressing about it. How many more of these goddamn elections are we going to have to write off as lame, but “regrettably necessary” holding actions? And how many more of these stinking double-downer sideshows will we have to go through before we can get ourselves straight enough to put together some kind of national election that will give me and the at least 20 million people I tend to agree with a chance to vote for something, instead of always being faced with that old familiar choice between the lesser of two evils?

Now with another one of these big bogus showdowns looming down on us, I can already pick up the stench of another bummer. I understand, along with a lot of other people, that the big thing this year is Beating Nixon. But that was also the big thing, as I recall, twelve years ago in 1960 – and as far as I can tell, we’ve gone from bad to worse to rotten since then, and the outlook is for more of the same.

[/QUOTE]

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Snowboarder\_Bo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/snowboarder_bo/32/229_2.png) [@Snowboarder\_Bo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Snowboarder_Bo)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 3:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/103 "2016-10-01T15:20:03Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Well then, what has she actually achieved?
> 
> I’m not American. I have no vote. I have no animus here. Are you saying that Americans should be sexist? Are you saying that Americans should vote for someone who has apparently achieved so little despite their high positions? Why aren’t you voting for one of the other candidates?

You claim to have no animus, yet you started a thread with ostensible purpose of hearing what good points there are in favor of Mrs. Clinton, yet in every post you denigrate her. Based on this, it seems reasonable to conclude that you are “just asking questions” rather than seeking actual information or discourse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Aspenglow](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aspenglow/32/76_2.png) [@Aspenglow](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Aspenglow)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 3:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/104 "2016-10-01T15:41:39Z")

</div>

> [@msmith537](#):
>
> So clearly you never watch Fox News.

Ya got me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sherrerd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sherrerd/32/8_2.png) [@Sherrerd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sherrerd)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/105 "2016-10-01T19:59:37Z")

</div>

> [@don\_t\_ask](#):
>
> If there were more old timers like me that had read [_Fear and Loathing: On the Campaign Trail ’72_](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear_and_Loathing_on_the_Campaign_Trail_%2772) there may be more thought about what actually gets achieved, and when, by lesser evil voting.
> 
> > [@](#):
> >
> > … I understand, along with a lot of other people, that the big thing this year is Beating Nixon. But that was also the big thing, as I recall, twelve years ago in 1960 – and as far as I can tell, we’ve gone from bad to worse to rotten since then, and the outlook is for more of the same.

That’s the human condition.

There is no bright shining noble Father who will give us all we want and protect us and inspire us.

There are only flawed fellow-humans who, to varying degrees, will act in ways that we reasonably believe will–on the margins, at least–benefit ourselves and the society as a whole. What adults do is look at each of the candidates and assess those factors, choosing the least-worst of them and voting them into office.

That’s the reality for those who have given up the delusions of adolescence. We don’t feel sorry for ourselves because we recognize that we do not live in a world of supernatural beings who exist only to stimulate or entertain or please us. We exist in a world of other people. And contrary to our teenaged fantasies, not a single one of us happens to be the center of the universe.

The dream of The Candidate We Vote FOR is, fundamentally, a _narcissistic_ dream.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 8:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/106 "2016-10-01T20:50:22Z")

</div>

> [@Snowboarder\_Bo](#):
>
> You claim to have no animus, yet you started a thread with ostensible purpose of hearing what good points there are in favor of Mrs. Clinton, yet in every post you denigrate her.

I’m sure you can back up that statement, so please go ahead.

> [@](#):
>
> Based on this, it seems reasonable to conclude that you are “just asking questions” rather than seeking actual information or discourse.

That’s a very silly and paranoid conclusion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/107 "2016-10-01T20:57:06Z")

</div>

> [@RitterSport](#):
>
> OK, so can we then assume that you’ve been convinced that there are very good reasons to vote for Clinton (and not just against Trump)? Could we ask you to summarize those reasons based on your reading of all the points made in this thread?

**Adaher** made some very good points about her personal qualities in his thread, and **Gigobuster** noted two actual achievements. Other posts show she’s ridden quite a few coat-tails and been astute in backing the right bills.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/108 "2016-10-01T22:29:23Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> **Adaher** made some very good points about her personal qualities in his thread, and **Gigobuster** noted two actual achievements. Other posts show she’s ridden quite a few coat-tails and been astute in backing the right bills.

Ahem, if you had bothered to check the link where those 2 achievements I quoted came from, you would had seen that those are only 2 of the 10 the cite points at.

> **[After My 'Terrible' Fox News Fail, I'm Ready To Defend Hillary Clinton's Record](https://www.huffpost.com/entry/confession-of-a-fox-news-flunky-hillary-clinton-was_b_5797af58e4b0e339c23fae51)**
>
> Judge Pirro asked me a question that I didn’t know was coming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 10:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/109 "2016-10-01T22:36:58Z")

</div>

I listed several very good reasons in post #4 to support Clinton, **Quartz.**

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 10:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/110 "2016-10-01T22:37:37Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> Ahem, if you had bothered to check the link where those 2 achievements I quoted came from, you would had seen that those are only 2 of the 10 the cite points at.
> 
> [Confession of A Fox News Flunky: Hillary Clinton Was A Great, Progressive Senator | HuffPost Latest News](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/confession-of-a-fox-news-flunky-hillary-clinton-was_us_5797af58e4b0e339c23fae51)

Actually I did read it, but **you** only noted two of them, so I repeated that. And, flu vaccine? How does that require a law? And seven were bipartisan, so would have passed anyway

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/111 "2016-10-01T22:49:58Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> I listed several very good reasons in post #4 to support Clinton, **Quartz.**

You might think that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/112 "2016-10-01T22:53:22Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> You might think that.

Perhaps your OP should have been:

“Give me reasons to vote for Clinton, which I will ignore, or dismiss with no explanations given.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 10:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/113 "2016-10-01T22:54:21Z")

</div>

Clinton, so the next election isn’t Trump v. The Humongous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/114 "2016-10-01T23:16:15Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> You might think that.

I assumed you were actually interested in discussion. If you weren’t, perhaps you could have made that clear and I wouldn’t have wasted my time trying to answer your questions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/115 "2016-10-01T23:20:35Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> You might think that.

What I think is that she could have cured polio and invented the internet, and it wouldn’t matter to you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GIGObuster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gigobuster/32/421_2.png) [@GIGObuster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GIGObuster)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 11:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/116 "2016-10-01T23:29:21Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Actually I did read it, but **you** only noted two of them, so I repeated that.

:rolleyes:

So many years here and you forget that there is a limit on how much we can quote from a cite? I actually do expect others to check at least a bit form the cited article, but that is just me. And clearly you did tell others that there were just two, that was not the case.

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> And, flu vaccine? How does that require a law? And seven were bipartisan, so would have passed anyway

That is actually a demonstration of how she can work across the isle. And that is yet another reason why one should vote for Clinton.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Euphonious\_Polemic](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/euphonious_polemic/32/3002_2.png) [@Euphonious\_Polemic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Euphonious_Polemic)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2016, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/117 "2016-10-01T23:30:12Z")

</div>

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> What I think is that she could have cured polio and invented the internet, and it wouldn’t matter to you.

Typical Democrat: Destroy American medical equipment manufacturers, and create a platform for easy access to porn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kaylasdad99](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kaylasdad99/32/3398_2.png) [@kaylasdad99](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kaylasdad99)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2016, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/118 "2016-10-02T01:29:16Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Trump aside, why should an American vote for Clinton in her own right?
> 
> Trump? We’re ignoring him here; there are other candidates.

I don’t feel any compulsion to respect that stricture, so I’m going to ignore it, and repeat what I wrote in the “Voters Born in the '90s need to get a Clue” thread:

> [@](#):
>
> Forget about “Why should I vote FOR the Democrat?” That’s puerile and stupid. The answer is “To keep the REPUBLICAN out of the White House!” That is enough good to justify it. You might as well ask “Why should I eat this bag of Chili-cheese Fritos instead of this spoonful of strychnine?” I shouldn’t have to prove that Chili-cheese Fritos are GOOD for you to persuade you to not poison yourself.
> 
> And in this case, to not poison ME, along with yourself.

Yeah it’s easy. Probably TOO easy. I suppose it might be good for the country if the GOP were to legitimately make it _less_ easy, but I don’t really think that will ever happen again in my lifetime.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quartz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quartz/32/267_2.png) [@Quartz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quartz)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2016, 9:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/119 "2016-10-02T09:27:22Z")

</div>

> [@Euphonious\_Polemic](#):
>
> Perhaps your OP should have been:
> 
> “Give me reasons to vote for Clinton, which I will ignore, or dismiss with no explanations given.”

Memo to self: be more careful about posting when you should be in bed. I accidentally deleted a whole paragraph. Just because you say her policies are superior doesn’t mean that they actually are. You would have done better to point out that her policies are actually thought-out and she actually has policies rather than off-the-cuff positions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [October 2, 2016, 11:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225/120 "2016-10-02T11:57:59Z")

</div>

> [@Quartz](#):
>
> Memo to self: be more careful about posting when you should be in bed. I accidentally deleted a whole paragraph. Just because you say her policies are superior doesn’t mean that they actually are. You would have done better to point out that her policies are actually thought-out and she actually has policies rather than off-the-cuff positions.

I listed a bunch of her policies which I believe are superior. If you don’t like those policies then that wouldn’t work for you. Or maybe you like some and don’t like some. It’d be helpful if you actually provided some feedback – which positions that I listed do you disagree with, or dislike, or have some other problem with?

Or just carry on with the cryptic statements and non-responses, and maybe I’ll learn that it’s not worth putting effort into discussing things with you.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/so-why-vote-for-clinton/767225.md?page=7)
