I’m sorry that I seem to keep picking on you, Little Nemo. You seem like a nice guy. But you continually misrepresent me, and disrespect me.
It now sounds like you’re standing by your earlier statement:
I still think your position is confused, but I don’t want to argue semantics. In fact, I’m tired of arguing with you at all. But would you ever answer my question: Would it be “fundamentally different” if Soc Sec bought Canada’s bonds instead of U.S. bonds? How about if you knew U.S. Treasury would then need to borrow another 2 trillion and got it from Canada which suddenly had found itself with 2 trillion extra greenbacks on hand? :dubious:
Yes? Was there a time I didn’t?
[/QUOTE]
Earlier you wrote:
Your latest statement implies you think I’m still wrong about the “martingale.” Care to nominate one of the Board’s mathematicians as referee and wager on his decision?