# Socks and immaturity

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 1, 2005, 5:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409 "2005-06-01T17:51:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [June 1, 2005, 11:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/41 "2005-06-01T23:45:28Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> _TVeblen said:_  
> Being tougher with warnings and faster with bannings? Sounds good to me. I’m not being facetious here, btw. But does the membership overall want us to warn posters just because they’re irritating as hell? I dunno. Maybe so, and it’s a legitimate question. We haven’t found a clear, definable, defensible basis that would satisfy most (“all” is a pipe dream) but maybe there is one. Any suggestions welcome.

Not to speak for him but **Airman** might be thinking better enforcement of current warnings and rules, not more stringent ones. A more prominent “last warning” list said to be now implemented in the mod forum will probably go a long way to addressing **Airman** ’s concerns ISTM.

As far as a rule change, maybe anyone on last chance should automatically have his thread starting abilities cut off and be on a strict “no hijacking” probation for some set period.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Scissorjack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c67d28/32.png) [@Scissorjack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Scissorjack)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/42 "2005-06-02T00:12:12Z")

</div>

> [@Ass For A Hat](#):
>
> The censors may be watching the sensors, but who’s watching the censors? The scenesters, possibly?

_Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?_

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/43 "2005-06-02T00:12:33Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> As far as a rule change, maybe anyone on last chance should automatically have his thread starting abilities cut off and be on a strict “no hijacking” probation for some set period.

Were you a hall monitor in school? 🙂

I prefer “All rules, including this one, shall be illegal.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 12:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/44 "2005-06-02T00:26:52Z")

</div>

How about we just stick to the “don’t be a jerk” rule, and if someone gets “terminated”, their offenses (or some of their worst ones) are linked to. Banning the annoying is pretty broad. Every one of us is annoying to someone. All of us. If annoying was all it took, SDMB would be pretty empty. If smeone is a sock, then I’m fine with both the sock and the “real person” being obliterated.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 12:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/45 "2005-06-02T00:31:25Z")

</div>

That last reply annoyed me. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 12:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/46 "2005-06-02T00:44:50Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> That last reply annoyed me. 😃

You are dang annoying. 😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 12:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/47 "2005-06-02T00:45:54Z")

</div>

When a centaur senses censors  
It, incensed, dissents from censures,  
Since the incense of a censer  
Is incendiary scenture.

😉

When tension tends on to dissension  
Pretension distends the contention  
Until comprehension  
Portends apprehension,  
Detention, and swift sock suspension.

😃

What?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/48 "2005-06-02T01:11:38Z")

</div>

Question: Is a thread about the “immaturity” of socks being 7/8ths joke posts real irony or Morissette irony?

😉

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/49 "2005-06-02T01:15:46Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> Morissette irony?
> 
> 😉

I _hate_ it when that happens!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![samclem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/a9a28c/32.png) [@samclem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/samclem)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 1:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/50 "2005-06-02T01:28:46Z")

</div>

If I were a poster in this thread, I’d be looking over my shoulder for a quadruped with spots, and a pretty good view of the terrain for, oh, say…6 miles around. :eek:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SteveG1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bb73d2/32.png) [@SteveG1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SteveG1)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 1:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/51 "2005-06-02T01:29:29Z")

</div>

> [@silenus](#):
>
> That last reply annoyed me. 😃

[Making a show of wiping hands]My work here is done 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ass\_For\_A\_Hat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/ec9cab/32.png) [@Ass\_For\_A\_Hat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ass_For_A_Hat)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/52 "2005-06-02T01:41:48Z")

</div>

> [@Case Sensitive](#):
>
> _Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?_

Absolutely. When there are pitas involved, you can’t have too much oversight.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carnivorousplant](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnivorousplant/32/3563_2.png) [@carnivorousplant](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carnivorousplant)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/53 "2005-06-02T01:57:12Z")

</div>

> [@samclem](#):
>
> If I were a poster in this thread, I’d be looking over my shoulder for a quadruped with spots, and a pretty good view of the terrain for, oh, say…6 miles around. :eek:

Ah, begging your pardon, Mr. Moderator, Sir, but you _are_ a poster in this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giraffe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giraffe/32/129_2.png) [@Giraffe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giraffe)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 2:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/54 "2005-06-02T02:17:15Z")

</div>

> [@samclem](#):
>
> If I were a poster in this thread, I’d be looking over my shoulder for a quadruped with spots, and a pretty good view of the terrain for, oh, say…6 miles around. :eek:

Nah, as long as a couple of them keep talking about the rules or moderating or whatever, the rest pretty much have carte blanche to act silly. It’s a loophole, like having diplomatic immunity or taking the license plate off your car and driving on the sidewalk. I am powerless to stop them.

Unless they piss me off, of course, and then watch out. I’ll waggle my finger at the screen so menacingly you won’t believe it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TVeblen](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/4bbf92/32.png) [@TVeblen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TVeblen)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 2:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/55 "2005-06-02T02:54:27Z")

</div>

> [@Giraffe](#):
>
> Unless they piss me off, of course, and then watch out. I’ll waggle my finger at the screen so menacingly you won’t believe it.

Finger?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Giraffe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/giraffe/32/129_2.png) [@Giraffe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Giraffe)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/56 "2005-06-02T03:20:11Z")

</div>

> [@TVeblen](#):
>
> Finger?

It’s the only thing I know how to waggle menacingly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/57 "2005-06-02T03:20:30Z")

</div>

Are there rules about wagging your tongue at the screen?

Would a giraffe waggling its tongue at a Doper be construed as making death threats?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 3:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/58 "2005-06-02T03:22:34Z")

</div>

> [@EddyTeddyFreddy](#):
>
> Would a giraffe waggling its tongue at a Doper be construed as making death threats?

It’s 18 inches long and prehensile. I doubt a death threat is what would leap to mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Salem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/8c91f0/32.png) [@Salem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Salem)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/59 "2005-06-02T03:24:34Z")

</div>

> [@dropzone](#):
>
> (does it count as stirring shit if I have my tongue in my cheek when i do it?)

Depends on what’s in your cheek. And how long your tongue is.

😃

We’re so cute it’s hard to stay mad at us, eh?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [June 2, 2005, 3:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409/60 "2005-06-02T03:25:39Z")

</div>

Hey, it could poke your eye out! Or wrap around your neck and strangle you! Shouldn’t there be giraffe tongue control laws?

I can hear the naysayers now: When 18-inch prehensile tongues are outlawed, only outlaws will have 18-inch prehensile tongues.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/socks-and-immaturity/306409.md?page=4)
