In that scenario, everybody lives to play the game again tomorrow.
Just because the bombing kill people right then and there, that doesn’t mean that the victims of corporate crime are more fortunate. They also die. It might take a bit longer, but they make up for it with more painful deaths and sheer numbers.
[ul]
[li]Two people have been arrested - father and son.[/li][li]Two officers are dead, including the bomb expert.[/li][li]The chief of police has lost part of his leg in the explosion.[/li][li]The police moved the bomb inside of the bank because they thought it was a fake bomb. It exploded when they attempted to open it.[/li][/ul]
Link here.
whatever :rolleyes:
This attempt to link a specific (and heinous) crime with a vague “corporate crime” bogieman seems decidedly weak. There is plenty of corporate crime, and it runs the gamut from mild to beyond nasty. Some of it may well be the moral equivalent of blowing people up; plenty isn’t.
Saying that corporate crime victims “also die” “more painful deaths” is no doubt true in some cases and absurdly false in others. Large numbers of white collar criminals most certainly have their hands less bloodied.
The issue probably belongs in another thread.
Depending on the type of bomb, the robot itself can blow it to pieces with a small gun, rendering it inactive.