# some general questions re: trolling

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [December 3, 2014, 3:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200 "2014-12-03T03:46:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 11\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2014, 3:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/1 "2014-12-03T03:46:30Z")

</div>

I’m just curious, what is the preponderance of evidence required to ban someone for trolling? Is it enough to post repeatedly about the same controversial topic, or does there need to be additional corroborating evidence?

I’m trying to keep it vague here though I do have a specific recent moderator decision in mind. I’m more curious about what the general guidelines are, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2014, 4:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/2 "2014-12-03T04:16:39Z")

</div>

> [@Spice\_Weasel](#):
>
> Is it enough to post repeatedly about the same controversial topic, or does there need to be additional corroborating evidence?

Speaking as a former mod, in general, it’s more tone than topic. Posters who have been on the board for a longer time and have participated in other subjects as a reasonable poster, in general, get more slack, as it is assumed that they have demonstrated interest in the board, and not simply interest in getting a rise out of people on a particular subject. I repeat, in general.

> [@](#):
>
> I’m trying to keep it vague here though I do have a specific recent moderator decision in mind. I’m more curious about what the general guidelines are, though.

I’ve always, as a poster and a mod, disliked traps like this. If you have a complaint, make it clear what your complaint is. Vagueness in posts like this is not useful.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2014, 4:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/3 "2014-12-03T04:19:04Z")

</div>

This isn’t a court of law. Decisions on whether someone is trolling are based on a various factors, and on a case by case basis. I don’t think we can give you an answer without a specific example. If you want to PM me, I can tell you the reason for a decision in a specific case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2014, 4:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/4 "2014-12-03T04:25:02Z")

</div>

> [@Frank](#):
>
> Speaking as a former mod, in general, it’s more tone than topic. Posters who have been on the board for a longer time and have participated in other subjects as a reasonable poster, in general, get more slack, as it is assumed that they have demonstrated interest in the board, and not simply interest in getting a rise out of people on a particular subject. I repeat, in general.  
> I’ve always, as a poster and a mod, disliked traps like this. If you have a complaint, make it clear what your complaint is. Vagueness in posts like this is not useful.

I don’t have any complaint. There was a recent banning with no apparent explanation which prompted me to wonder whether there was a set of general guidelines for determining if someone is a troll. I don’t disagree with the decision, I was just curious.

It sounds like it’s always context-specific.

I guess I will just PM a mod.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Frank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frank)\
**Post date:** [December 3, 2014, 4:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/5 "2014-12-03T04:29:30Z")

</div>

> [@Spice\_Weasel](#):
>
> I guess I will just PM a mod.

Certainly. If you are curious as to why a particular poster was banned with no public explanation, asking a current mod via PM or email is what you should do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Peter\_Morris](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/peter_morris/32/359_2.png) [@Peter\_Morris](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Peter_Morris)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2014, 12:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/6 "2014-12-06T12:50:23Z")

</div>

> [@Spice\_Weasel](#):
>
> I don’t have any complaint. There was a recent banning with no apparent explanation …

Usually indicates a sock puppet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2014, 6:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/7 "2014-12-06T18:33:46Z")

</div>

I’m pretty sure I know who you’re talking about. One of the more prominent board mysogynists, right? He was, as **Peter Morris** suggested, a sock of a banned poster.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Spice\_Weasel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/spice_weasel/32/5435_2.png) [@Spice\_Weasel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Spice_Weasel)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2014, 6:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/8 "2014-12-06T18:56:18Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> I’m pretty sure I know who you’re talking about. One of the more prominent board mysogynists, right? He was, as **Peter Morris** suggested, a sock of a banned poster.

Yes, I got the answer I was looking for from a Mod. Thank you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dseymore](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/53a042/32.png) [@dseymore](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dseymore)\
**Post date:** [December 6, 2014, 10:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/9 "2014-12-06T22:51:07Z")

</div>

I have a rare quarter can any one help me

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TubaDiva](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tubadiva/32/507_2.png) [@TubaDiva](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TubaDiva)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2014, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/10 "2014-12-07T00:30:44Z")

</div>

dseymore, ?? What are you talking about?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![engineer\_comp\_geek](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/engineer_comp_geek/32/504_2.png) [@engineer\_comp\_geek](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/engineer_comp_geek)\
**Post date:** [December 7, 2014, 1:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/some-general-questions-re-trolling/706200/11 "2014-12-07T01:39:37Z")

</div>

> [@TubaDiva](#):
>
> dseymore, ?? What are you talking about?

Something that has nothing at all to do with this thread.

See here:  
[http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=17955391#post17955391](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=17955391#post17955391)
