Southern Style-could you please explain your sig?

I think this was also part of the stand-up act of Wanda Sykes-Hall, who had a startlingly funny Comedy Central special on that they re-run when the gods are happy.

As for the sig, it’s about as funny as saying, “Gee, I’m sure glad I’m not gay!” Which is not really funny and not really offensive, either, just sorta…odd.

Hey, let’s try it this way, is this funny:
“When I joined the country club, they wouldn’t let in Jews. Then, it became optional. I’m certainly glad I left before it became madatory!”

Gee, I’m not laughing with that one. Hmm…Well, maybe that’s not the same, exactly. Is it?

Okay…I didn’t mean to start a war over it.
As I said, I wasn’t offended, just a little put off by what it MIGHT mean…

Oh, and as for you narcoleptic seven year old alkies…bite me!
:smiley:

I thought it was a joke too. :smiley:

Why are some of you putting a period before sig? “.sig”
I thought sig was short for “signature”, so there would be a period after the “g” if at all. Just a question.

Because some of us are old, and don’t know where the dot is supposed to be? :wink:

bwk, in Unix, resource files are kept in files with standard names beginning with a ‘.’ so they are somewhat hidden, ie .profile .cshrc. So .sig was just used as a file where your standard signature was kept.

A British version of SouthernStyle’s sig appeared in Healey and Glanville’s Urban Myths Unplugged, which suggests two things:

  1. The saying is fairly widespread.

  2. If it’s supposed to be a “joke,” it’s a really old one (Healey and Glanville are not known for being cutting-edge as, say, Snopes)

  3. Er, Hi, Opal.

Okay, I’m gay and I was in the military. I don’t “get” this joke. It seems, to me, to be a slight toward homosexuals, essentially saying, “boy I’m glad I’m not one of those!” If Southern Style wants this in his .sig file, fine by me. I consider it typical of him.

I’ve tried DavisMcDavis’s suggestion (substituting another minority group) and it still doesn’t seem funny. Try substituting “blacks,” “women” or “jews” for "homosexual in the joke, does it still seem funny?

I’m not mad at anyone, I just don’t get WHY this is funny. Can someone explain it?

Ok folks, it’s time for me to weigh in. This post will be direct. It will be abrupt. And it will be my definitive word. I will not post a follow-up in this thread nor will I in any way engage anyone in a debate in this thread.

Ahem…

First, I want to complement Anthracite, friedo, Zumba, Spritle, and others for their level headed assessments. Especially gratifying is their failing to instinctively find something “dark and sinister” in something so benign as a signature.

Several of you have shown no common sense and have taken a confrontational tone. Your public accusations warrant rebuttal and you deserve berating. I shall oblige.

Let’s start with Guinastasia. Exactly what were you thinking? Or were you? You come to the Pit, a forum reserved exclusively for cussing, swearing, arguing, complaining, and confronting those with whom you have a beef, and accuse me of attacking homosexuals. Tell me, are you nuts? Are you fucking nuts? In the more than a thousand posts that I’ve submitted to the SDMB have you seen any indication that I’m bigotted, homophobic, or in any way descriminatory against anyone on the basis of race, sex, nationality, height, hair color, or shoe size? The only “group” that I recall generalizing in a negative fashion is the leeches on our society. If you have connected the dots in such a way that by inference you equate homosexuals with leeches, that’s your problem. It’s not my belief nor have I made any such statement.

You claim that your question is not “pit worthy”, but that certainly didn’t stop you from posting your message here. A message, I might add, that is a thinly veiled attempt to make you look considerate while painting me with the broad brush of intolerance.

The last sentence of your OP starts If I am wrong. (The only way one can be wrong is to have already formed an opinion.) Well you were wrong. In several ways. I am not the one showing intolerance, you are. I am not the one that took a complete stranger to the pit and made warrantless accusations, you are. I am not the one with an alleged “problem” requiring an answer, you are. And the only one that showed a complete lack of respect (your word) to another by initiating a public lynching is you.

Since joining the SDMB about 6 months ago, I’ve used a number of signatures. All of them had a humorous thread.

[ul]
[li]This job is a test. It is only a test. Had it been an actual job you would have received raises, promotions, and other tokens of appreciation.[/li][li]Never rassle with a pig. You both get dirty, but the pig likes it.[/li][li]When the going gets tough, the tough get duct tape.[/li][li]Only a genius or a fool would make such a move. SouthernStyle, being both, had no choice.[/li][/ul]

These are a sampling. Until posting my current signature, the only individual or group that can be associated with ANY of them is the author – me.

pldennison – We’ve crossed paths several times in other threads and I’ve always considered our exchanges to be fair and thought provoking. Have you suddenly become so thin-skinned that just the use of the word “homosexual” causes you to put on blinders? I don’t recall ever reading one of your threads where you belittle Richard Pryor for making millions by using the word “nigger”. Nor do I recall one of your threads ever taking Robin Williams to task for using “God Damn”, George Carlin for saying “fuck”, anyone on this board for telling a “blond joke”, etc. Exactly what prompted you to jump on the “me too” bandwagon here?

Exprix – I read your post and I desperately want to read it as an explanation for why others may be taking exception. But the more I read it and try to interpret your writing, the more that I am convinced that you too, want to paint a few strokes with that broad brush of intolerance. Since I don’t espouse a liberal ideology I must be a bigot? I use the word “homosexual” and am not homosexual so I must be phobic?

Get a clue. Get real. Get a life.

DavisMcDavis - Not taking you to task here, this is just a comment. I did find humor in your reworked version. Just as I’d have found humor if you’d reference blacks instead of Jews or several other scenarios. I can picture a standup comic using any of these jokes in a routine. Chris Rock may not be able to pull it off, but Rodney Dangerfield certainly could.

Folks, there is humor in my life. Every day. At 6’7", 250#, I hear every “dumb jock” joke that goes around. The funny part is, I got my size after leaving high school so I had a completely different take on things in my youth. At 15 I was one of the school “geeks”. An IQ in the “gifted” range and a National Math Test score to back it up. I was the brunt of every “smart” joke you can imaging. I was despised by those “average” because it came easy to me and beat up the the jocks, just because they could do it. My wife is a 5’4", 125#, size 5 blonde. WE are quite a sight and take a lot of kidding. SHE is blonde and spends every day living down the stereotype.

People, I can laugh at myself. And I will laugh at you. Whether it be a stereotype that you try to live down, or your assinine public display of intolerance, I will laugh. Now if you want me to laugh with you, say something funny. If you want me to laugh at you, keep going as you are.


sig omitted by choice.

I will respond to well mannered e-mail.

Oh, puh-lease, Mary - get over your cheap sorry self. There are people that are offended by my .sig just because it’s shameless self-promotion. Kee-ripes.

But, wait - he’s too far up on his high horse to debate us. Whatever. :rolleyes:

Keep it, discard it, do whatever makes ya happy, Southern. Nobody hates you.

Esprix

Not funny in the least. But that’s because it’s a rip-off of the joke we’re talking about.

The same punchline used in rapid succession is never funny after the first use.

But other than that, no, I’m not offended by it.

In real life, there are things that offend some people, that don’t offend others. If a sig offends you, bear in mind that it is not universally offensive, state your objection and get over it. Tomorrow you’ll find something else to be offended by.

Hey SouthernStyle, how’s the center of the Universe today? :wink:

Ohfercryingoutloud, what’s up with the knee jerk reactions? I am surprised at the way some of you seem to go out of your way to find something to be offended by. Don’t give me the “change the wording to Jew or black or whatever”, it isn’t relevant because **it is not directed at homosexuals but simply an old joke on the idiotic “don’t ask, don’t tell” Clinton policy. Period. **

Sheeeeesh!

Well, so says SouthernStyle, at least the joke part. And intent does count.

Esprix

only in a murder trial, or similar criminal procedings. I think that no matter what the explination here, you’re going to be offended by it. I’m not suprised, because I understand the mindset. I live in Mississippi, and it’s nearly illegal to repeat, say, a joke Chris Rock uses if you’re white, because then you are automatically a racist.
But if you happen to be of that class/group/whatever, it’s perfectly normal.

You’re offended. We understand.

Uh, not sure why I’m getting (what I’m reading as) a condescending retort - I’m giving Southern the benefit of the doubt by virtue of the fact that he says his intent was not to offend.

And, once again, please - I am not offended, I just think it’s in poor taste and did not initially read it as the funny joke Southern intended it to be.

Any further clarifications needed? I’d be happy to oblige.

Esprix

I think you guys are missing the more obvious joke. The combination of the words Southern and Style.

Very funny.

Nope, I think that clairfies my only problem. :smiley:

Which is/was?

Esprix