spelling bee on TV tonight.

I didn’t get beyond the spelling bee city finals in my youth, but I’ve always been a pretty good speller. Just last month I was back in the saddle again, competing in an adult community spelling bee with a team of three people from my church (we finished third out of 32, which ain’t half bad).

I watched a little last night and was mildly interested. I could spell only a few of the words, I’ll admit. One of them was “triticale” - I had a flashback to the Star Trek episode “The Trouble with Tribbles,” and kinda hoped they’d use a video clip of Mr. Spock explaining the meaning of the word!

I did the spelling bee thing in school as well; I won the school competition (not a large school), and ended up going to the regional bee. I was wiped out by “ancillary”, a word which at the time I had no idea about, but which now I know is an adjective meaning “supplimentary or auxiliary”. Derived from the Latin word ancilla - “handmaiden, female slave”.

The girl who did win was odd; I recall her wearing sickly yellow tights and bouncing on one heel as she recited each letter of the words she spelled. I also didn’t notice a single bit of glory emanating from my peers for the accomplishment. I don’t mean that as sour grapes, just a fact, and after that I didn’t really bother with spelling competitions.

Good spelling is the hallmark of healthy reading, which itself is a sign of intellectual curiosity. Intelligence then begets good spelling, but this does not mean that all good spellers are intelligent, a mistaken notion that competitions like the National Spelling Bee actively promote. That in and of itself would be relatively harmless but for the fact that in America, we believe that if a moderate amount of something is good then a whole lot of it must be great. Thus, the better you spell, the more intelligent you are, and the only way to measure “better” (in American society) is to have a head-to-head competition.

And even this wouldn’t be so bad if the participants were adults who–whether or not they understand the faulty logic given above–accept the challenge as a bit of good fun (this, I think, is the entire premise of the game show Jeopardy). Instead, we’re subjecting pre-teens to this pointless ritual, egged on by adults who can’t seem to set aside competitive fever when their own Johnny or Jane is involved.

The most apt analogy–as others have pointed out–is to competitive high-school athletics. Overpromotion of top professional sports and athletes have led to a condition where kids no longer play sports that aren’t imperiously organized by adults. The result: More kids today don’t participate in any kind of regular physical activity (childhood obesity is a real problem, but it’s one that has a rather obvious solution; why then is it such an epidemic in America?).

Spelling bees IMO promote a similar overall decay in genuine intellectual curiosity among children. Worse in fact, because (1) they also promote a weird, anti-social dynamic in those who do participate–check out the documentary “Spellbound” if you don’t believe me; and (2) there’s nowhere to go with championship spelling talent once the competition is over–at least good high-school athletes–who must sacrifice a significant portion of their childhood to achieve their goals–have a way to parlay that skill into a career.

In reviewing this, I notice that it could be read as a criticism of the children who participate in spelling bees. Nothing could be further from my intention; I’m sure all these kids in there own way are as bright and wonderful as any child. But I still wonder if participation in this event is damaging them somehow.

Even when you edit to check, you can’t avoid it!

I watched most of it. The competition I’d liken it more to is the Olympics, especially events like Gymnastics or Figure Skating. There is a lot of pressure on the kids to perform at a fairly young age (younger in the case of the Spelling Bee).

I liked the kid who made the joke - I think he was the same one who was surprised by getting several other words correct. If I remember, he was home schooled and they said it was his first year in the competition. You could tell he wasn’t one of those under a lot of pressure by the ‘system’ of the bee. It’s bothersome to hear the commentators saying things like, “here’s someone who’s been expected to do better - in the top 50 last year”. I’d prefer to see more kids like the joker.

Intesting that they had “grognard” (which I have only seen in the wargaming sense, and have never heard pronounced) and “fauchard”

D&D / gaming pays off!

Brian

I liked the little blond kid that was given (IIRC) “negrus,” who kept glancing around for someone to come out and pounce on him if he got it wrong.

I also really like the Indian girl whose name I’m not even going to attempt to spell (it began with a “K”)- the interviews with her friends who talked about how much she taught them about spelling and “other stuff” (about her culture) were really cute, especially when they said “She’s been to India- how cool is that?” Her little sister was utterly adorable as well- “She’s going to put her trophy in the trophy case, and I’m going to give her a BIG HUG!” :smiley:

Watching an interview with the winner this morning, I have to wonder… did he come across as a bit “off” to anyone else? The muscle spasms, the somewhat strange answers to basic questions, etc… I thought perhaps he may be somewhere on the autism spectrum, which (when coupled with the aformentioned things) would explain the “gifted in math, spelling and music” as well as the juggling (that would be an excellent OT task for him). It could be just 13 year old boy awkwardness coupled with exhaustion, though.

You know, I also suspected ASD in that kid. He acted so much like my oldest kid, it was like a neon sign to me. I wouldn’t exactly call him “off,” but I saw so many mannerisms that my own son exhibits.

Still, a bright, intelligent and accomplished kid.