Spike Lee says Italians aren't facing up to their real WWII history? Is he correct?

US protectionism in the film industry? Are you kidding? Hollywood falls all over itself to market foreign films to the Sex and the City crowd. An accent is good. Subtitles are better.

Anyway, you’re missing an important point. Miracle at St. Anna (and the other films I mentioned) are not documentaries and do not present themselves as such. If the public believes homeless people kick puppies and rape little boys because they saw it in a movie, the issue is not the film industry but the stupidity of the public.

AFAIK, there were no Cold War-era secret agents combing Nassau harbor for the yachts of evil supervillains- but hey, it was in a bunch of Bond movies, so it must be so.

  1. How can any serious dramatic movie portray all X as having the characteristic Y?

  2. Is your argument that Spike Lee’s movie portrays all Italian partisans (or all of any particular group) as having certain characteristics?

Well thanks a bunch for shattering all of my illusions about 007.

Between that and the tooth fairy, I nearly didn’t make it to puberty. A sad day.

I think we should start a fund that would make regular payments to Spike Lee as long as he does not make any more movies

That’s interesting. Strikes me as a bit similar to suggesting that the Civil Rights movement in the US is “indirectly responsible” for the Birmingham church bombing in 1963. After all, if the Civil Rights movement hadn’t used Southern churches as organizing centers, the KKK would probably never have put a bomb in one, right? Clearly, this is something about history that African Americans have to come to grips with.

Yes it is the highest bullshit. Spike Lee took pot shots at Clint Eastwood regarding his 2 movies adapted from non-fiction books: Flags of our Fathers and Letters from Iwo Jima. The first book was about the 6 people who were in the famous flag raising photograph. The second movie represents the Japanese side of the story. None of the main characters were black and black people were not missing from the movie as Spike Lee claimes.

“He did two films about Iwo Jima back to back and there was not one black soldier in both of those films,” Lee said Tuesday at the Cannes Film Festival, where he was a judge in an online short-film competition.

From Wiki:
In fact, black Marines are seen in scenes during which the mission is outlined, as well as during the initial landings, when a wounded black Marine is carried away. During the end credits, historical photographs taken during the Battle of Iwo Jima show black Marines. Although black Marines fought in the battle, they were restricted to auxiliary roles such as ammunition supply, and were not involved in the battle’s major assaults, but took part in defensive actions

The result was a movie interpretation by Spike Lee of a fictional book involving black soldiers fighting in Italy. Call it what you want.