# Spinsanity-Biased?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/spinsanity-biased/225028>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [January 18, 2004, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/spinsanity-biased/225028 "2004-01-18T01:08:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HPL](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/3da27b/32.png) [@HPL](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HPL)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2004, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/spinsanity-biased/225028/1 "2004-01-18T01:08:58Z")

</div>

I occasionally take a look at the site [www.spinsanity.com](http://www.spinsanity.com) and have to wonder how it is considered. It looks like they have a tendency to thrash both sides and provide cites as well, though the question is, do they favor one side over the other signigicantly , in the perception of dopers out there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![rjung](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/45deac/32.png) [@rjung](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rjung)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2004, 8:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/spinsanity-biased/225028/2 "2004-01-18T08:37:12Z")

</div>

Not in my experience.

Spinsanity is, at least IMO, the closest thing the net has right now to a neutral observer.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrTuffPaws](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f475e1/32.png) [@MrTuffPaws](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrTuffPaws)\
**Post date:** [January 18, 2004, 9:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/spinsanity-biased/225028/3 "2004-01-18T09:03:52Z")

</div>

On thing I notice, is that they don’t update their stories often. This, I think, might lead to a image of bias, being that some story will grace their main page for weeks.