# Splitting the Difference--Dead Thread for The Split

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/splitting-the-difference-dead-thread-for-the-split/486357>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [February 18, 2009, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/splitting-the-difference-dead-thread-for-the-split/486357 "2009-02-18T03:10:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 87

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DogMom](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e9c0ed/32.png) [@DogMom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DogMom)\
**Post date:** [March 4, 2009, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/splitting-the-difference-dead-thread-for-the-split/486357/87 "2009-03-04T17:50:56Z")

</div>

> [@Werewolf (Mafia)--The Split \[Signups--In progress\]](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/werewolf-mafia-the-split-signups-in-progress/485692/869):
>
> Ah, I see - most of us aren’t doing what **Seeker** is asking. To be more clear, then, what I should have said was that **Seeker** must have known he’d be likely to be tested, right? So if we assume a rational **Seeker** , are we sure we want to test him based on his claim? I guess there’s nothing else for it, but it seems clear that we’re missing something here, doesn’t it? That **Seeker** wanted us to stop doing what we were doing, and do something else, and that that’s what we’re doing?
> 
> Ah well. I hate being fucked with, but I suppose when somebody says he’s a wolf…  
> \*\*  
> Untest Telcontar  
> Test Seeker\*\*

HAH! Someone saw it!!! WELL DONE, Jimmy!

{random prediction}  
Bet they eat him tonight…

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/splitting-the-difference-dead-thread-for-the-split/486357)._