# St. Januarius, Miracles, and the Proof of God.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [September 20, 2018, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639 "2018-09-20T16:27:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 31

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 9:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/601 "2018-10-05T21:53:02Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> So you are saying that Jesus did not have to die.

No. I am saying _I don’t know_.

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> If God wants our sacrifice, it is to show love and or obedience. Why does God have to sacrifice to himself? Isn’t it standard dogma that salvation is only available through Christ? If so, then the sacrifice is required, and God can’t do it on his own and thus God is not God.

It’s all for our sake, not God’s. God, being God, can do whatever he wants. As I said many times already, I don’t know what was “required” or what God “had to do”, if he had to do anything at all. I know that _for our sake_ God became a man, _for our sake_, he suffered and died, _for our sake_, he rose from the dead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/602 "2018-10-05T21:55:34Z")

</div>

> [@Czarcasm](#):
>
> Critiquing what it says would probably be more appropriate after you read it, btw.

To be fair (to myself 🆒), I didn’t critique the content of the link; but I am familiar with Sabellianism/Modalism, so I didn’t feel that critiquing the post itself was out of line.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/603 "2018-10-05T21:55:55Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> Really? That’s pretty bad if it’s the best you’ve got. I would think the best evidence against the Resurrection is that **people don’t rise from the dead**.

If we’re going to accept evidence like **that** then this thread wouldn’t have even been started - back before it became “catholocism - T or F?” it was about whether miracles were convincing to atheists. If “it’s not possible” is enough to disprove a miracle, well…

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> The Apostles did claim that it happened.

Documents written much later claim that the Apostles claim it happened - and they also claimed that gobs of other people saw all this going on. Wouldn’t it have been a bit remarkable at the time, to the wider populace?

Seriously, one of the biggest strikes against the whole bible is that back then, the miracles were _awesome_. And yet people forgot them as quickly as if they’d been stage magic. Almost enough to make a person believe that the “miracles” were less impressive in person.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/604 "2018-10-05T22:02:00Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> To be fair (to myself 🆒), I didn’t critique the content of the link; but I am familiar with Sabellianism/Modalism, so I didn’t feel that critiquing the post itself was out of line.

If you’re familiar with how the Catholic church gradually got its act together over the course of hundreds of years, how can you claim that it has been teaching the same thing for 2000 years?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 10:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/605 "2018-10-05T22:47:21Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> Read the cite. Catholicism didn’t spring fully-formed from Peter’s head; it was built from the ground up. By _way_ too many architects.

I have gone to the wiki page you linked, as well as the wiki for Sabellianism.

I’m not really sure what you’re trying to prove. The fact that Sabellius (and his mentor) were denounced as heterodox a full century before Nicea is good evidence that the Church’s teaching re: the Trinity is historically consistent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 10:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/606 "2018-10-05T22:49:21Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> It’s all for our sake, not God’s. God, being God, can do whatever he wants. As I said many times already, I don’t know what was “required” or what God “had to do”, if he had to do anything at all. I know that _for our sake_ God became a man, _for our sake_, he suffered and died, _for our sake_, he rose from the dead.

Clearly God can do what he wants. But we didn’t sacrifice - God or Jesus did. And why can’t God forgive us for our sakes without any sacrifice? Requiring sincere atonement, or even confession, that makes sense. But not his sacrifice.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/607 "2018-10-05T22:50:17Z")

</div>

> [@begbert2](#):
>
> Documents written much later claim that the Apostles claim it happened - and they also claimed that gobs of other people saw all this going on. Wouldn’t it have been a bit remarkable at the time, to the wider populace?

If nobody immediately after the resurrection was claiming that it happened, then where did Mark, Luke, and Paul get their information from? Was the Acts completely fabricated?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 10:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/608 "2018-10-05T22:53:06Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> Clearly God can do what he wants. But we didn’t sacrifice - God or Jesus did. And why can’t God forgive us for our sakes without any sacrifice? Requiring sincere atonement, or even confession, that makes sense. But not his sacrifice.

But Jesus, being human, is “we/us”. God still forgave in the OT, look at the Psalms, “a contrite heart you will not despise”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 10:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/609 "2018-10-05T22:57:33Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> If nobody immediately after the resurrection was claiming that it happened, then where did Mark, Luke, and Paul get their information from? Was the Acts completely fabricated?

It may have been, but it’s more likely that it’s got parts that were basically factual, and other parts that are as factual as George Washington’s cheery tree. Memories of precise conversations and wordings (like “I am”) are more likely to have been derived from the tall tale side of oral tradition than the “this is the bit that survived the game of telephone” tradition.

And the more miraculous the event is -and the less consistently described the event is- the more likely it is to be a pious fable. People tell pious fables _now_; surely they told them then, and back then there wasn’t as much concern about dividing fables from facts.

As for the supposed resurrection itself, I’ve long thought that if you’re a devoted follower of an itinerant priest who just suddenly up and got _executed_, you might not take it well and wish that it hadn’t happened. Couple that with people’s tendency to still see Elvis, and the fact that people love an exciting/dramatic/inspiring story…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![begbert2](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/begbert2/32/3357_2.png) [@begbert2](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/begbert2)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 11:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/610 "2018-10-05T23:08:00Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> I have gone to the wiki page you linked, as well as the wiki for Sabellianism.
> 
> I’m not really sure what you’re trying to prove. The fact that Sabellius (and his mentor) were denounced as heterodox a full century before Nicea is good evidence that the Church’s teaching re: the Trinity is historically consistent.

In reading [the page on the trinity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity), it appears that part of the disagreement that permeates this tread may or may not be based on an unshared definition of the word “God”.

According to that link, under trinitarianism there are three distinct persons: The Father, the Son (Jesus), and the Holy Ghost. Collectively they form a committee known as “God”.

When everyone else refers to “God”, they’re referring to that dude known as “The Father”. The one who _isn’t_ Jesus, _didn’t_ go to earth, _didn’t_ die for anybody’s sins, _is_ the one who will judge people, and _is_ the one that Jesus referred to as ‘God’.

Putting aside the pointless confusion of calling the committed of three separate persons “God” too, if we follow _this_ interpretation of the trinity, we no longer have the foolishness of God sacrificing himself to himself in obedience to himself in order to convince himself to be more merciful to people that he want to be more merciful to than he does. And it would be really helpful if we dispensed with that nonsense.

So answer me this - in _your_ interpretation of the situation, are the Father and Jesus distinct beings? Which one went to earth? Which one didn’t?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/611 "2018-10-05T23:30:32Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> But Jesus, being human, is “we/us”. God still forgave in the OT, look at the Psalms, “a contrite heart you will not despise”.

YUou mean, if I had gotten drafted I could have told them Jesus would go in my place because he is us?  
However, I have to agree that this is kind of how Christianity has dine it for 2000 years. UYou can do any nasty stuff you want because Jesus was good and sacrificed. If there is a teaching about being virtuous, it certainly hasn’t taken.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Voyager](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/voyager/32/133_2.png) [@Voyager](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Voyager)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2018, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/612 "2018-10-05T23:34:09Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> If nobody immediately after the resurrection was claiming that it happened, then where did Mark, Luke, and Paul get their information from? Was the Acts completely fabricated?

Where did those who described the Nativity get their information from? Same place, probably.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 12:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/613 "2018-10-06T00:11:42Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> … _for our sake_, he rose from the dead.

See, this is where you lose us. How was the resurrection “for our sake”? It negates the “sacrifice”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DragonAsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/db5fbb/32.png) [@DragonAsh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DragonAsh)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 12:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/614 "2018-10-06T00:42:42Z")

</div>

You still haven’t answered my question.

What is hell like?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/615 "2018-10-06T01:06:05Z")

</div>

[quote=“begbert2, post:610, topic:821639”]

Putting aside the pointless confusion of calling the committed of three separate persons “God” too, if we follow _this_ interpretation of the trinity, we no longer have the foolishness of God sacrificing himself to himself in obedience to himself in order to convince himself to be more merciful to people that he want to be more merciful to than he does. And it would be really helpful if we dispensed with that nonsense.[/ QUOTE]

Now you’re getting it

[quote=“begbert2, post:610, topic:821639”]

So answer me this - in _your_ interpretation of the situation, are the Father and Jesus distinct beings? Which one went to earth? Which one didn’t?[/ QUOTE]

Keeping in mind that I fully defer to the Catholic interpretation in all things theological (so if I’m out of sync with it I will gladly defer), yes I think it’s accurate to say that the Father and Jesus are distinct, yet they are of the same substance, Jesus possessing the fullness of God within himself. Jesus distinctly came to earth while the Father didn’t. Because of the dynamics of the Trinity (which are fully admitted to be mysterious), you can refer to the Father and the Son as being distinct persons, yet they are in perfect union at the same time.

As an aside, I found a good summary here: [https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/sabellianism](https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/sabellianism)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/616 "2018-10-06T01:12:25Z")

</div>

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> YUou mean, if I had gotten drafted I could have told them Jesus would go in my place because he is us?

No. He is “we/us” in the sense that you used the term. We are all human, but still unique individuals, obviously.

> [@Voyager](#):
>
> However, I have to agree that this is kind of how Christianity has dine it for 2000 years. UYou can do any nasty stuff you want because Jesus was good and sacrificed. If there is a teaching about being virtuous, it certainly hasn’t taken.

No, that’s not Catholicism. Sounds more like Lutheranism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/617 "2018-10-06T01:16:36Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> See, this is where you lose us. How was the resurrection “for our sake”? It negates the “sacrifice”.

Does it? How so? His suffering and death were real. The resurrection served multiple purposes. It both validated Jesus’ claims of divinity, and foreshadowed/made real the promise of our own resurrection at the last day.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EscAlaMike](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/escalamike/32/4177_2.png) [@EscAlaMike](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EscAlaMike)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 1:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/618 "2018-10-06T01:17:51Z")

</div>

> [@DragonAsh](#):
>
> You still haven’t answered my question.
> 
> What is hell like?

How should I know, I haven’t been there. I’m sure it’s not pleasant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DragonAsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/db5fbb/32.png) [@DragonAsh](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DragonAsh)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 1:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/619 "2018-10-06T01:41:33Z")

</div>

> [@EscAlaMike](#):
>
> How should I know, I haven’t been there. I’m sure it’s not pleasant.

But the Bible tells you what it’s like. And your church - you know, the people interpreting the Bible for you - spent centuries telling you what it’s like. What does your Bible and Church tell you it’s like?

There are lots of things you can’t know directly, but you fervently believe it in anyway because that’s what the Bible/Church say you have to believe, no?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![sbunny8](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/c77e96/32.png) [@sbunny8](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/sbunny8)\
**Post date:** [October 6, 2018, 1:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639/620 "2018-10-06T01:47:55Z")

</div>

Plausible scenario:

1. A miracle occurs.
2. Only one person sees it.
3. Everyone s/he tells doesn’t believe it.

Not plausible scenario:

1. A miracle occurs.
2. Hundreds of people see it.
3. They don’t tell anybody else.
4. None of them bothers to write down the fact that they saw it.
5. Decades later, someone who wasn’t there writes down the fact that hundreds of people (who are now conveniently dead) saw it.

Much more plausible scenario:

1. Something really dull and ordinary happens.
2. People see it and aren’t impressed.
3. Decades later, someone writes it down, embellishes it, falsely claims that hundreds of people saw it and were amazed by it.
4. Centuries later, people insist that step 3 was “divinely inspired”, therefore the amazing thing actually happened.

Case in point: The book of Matthew claims that hundreds of dead people climbed out of their graves and walked around on the same day Jesus did. Allegedly, thousands of people witnessed this miracle. Not one of them wrote it down. No contemporary historian wrote about hundreds of zombies wandering around. No contemporary historian ever wrote about hundreds of people claiming to have seen hundreds of zombies. No contemporary historian even wrote about one lunatic telling tall tales about hundreds of zombies. No one refutes the story either, because there is no story to refute (not yet). Decades later, after all the alleged witnesses are conveniently dead, some anonymous author wrote down this tall tale and signed Matthew’s name to it. The most likely explanation for these facts is that the story is fiction.

I’m reminded of a story I read in the 1970s about a man who, in the 1800s, allegedly convinced the city of New York to pay him millions of dollars to disconnect the island of Manhattan from the mainland, turn it around, and reattach it. Funny thing is, there’s absolutely no mention of this hoax in the newspapers from the time when it was supposedly perpetrated. Turns out the first time the hoax was mentioned in print was shortly after the alleged prankster died. Conclusion: the story about the hoax is itself a hoax. It’s a lie told by one of his surviving relatives, embellishing upon his penchant for pulling stunts. This particular stunt is fictional. But the story was compelling enough to make its way into a book I read which claimed the story was true.

If it can happen in 19th century New York, it can certainly happen in 1st century Palestine.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639.md?page=30)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/st-januarius-miracles-and-the-proof-of-god/821639.md?page=32)
