# Stanley Kubrick...i'm glad you're dead!!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [April 1, 2000, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575 "2000-04-01T23:11:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 13\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mrsphlem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b77776/32.png) [@mrsphlem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mrsphlem)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 4:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/41 "2000-04-04T04:28:00Z")

</div>

Thanks for the hints, folks. I’ll keep them in mind. wink

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mrsphlem](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b77776/32.png) [@mrsphlem](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mrsphlem)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 4:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/42 "2000-04-04T04:29:00Z")

</div>

dammit!!Emote didn’t work!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SINsApple](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/eb8c5e/32.png) [@SINsApple](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SINsApple)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 5:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/43 "2000-04-04T05:29:00Z")

</div>

I must agree that I don’t much like Kubrick. But then I don’t like most existentialist artists anyway. (and it hurt to call him an artist)

The fact of the matter is that the Shining sucked beyond all else. Stephen King wrote a brilliant novel about alcoholism and spouse abuse, but between Kubrick and Shelley Duvall’s inability to act, they ruined it. The message and artistry of it was lost, and it became just another scary (not really) movie.

I haven’t seen EWS, and from the commentary here, I am more swayed by the people who didn’t like it. You people who are defending it seem to have pretty empty arguments. But then again, I am prejudiced. I already pointed out that I don’t respect Kubrick’s work.

* * *

Rather, I was in the position of a spore which, having finally accepted its destiny as a fungus, still wonders if it might produce penicillin.  
–Ayi Kwei Armah

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![brittainy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/a88e4f/32.png) [@brittainy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/brittainy)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 2:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/44 "2000-04-04T14:24:00Z")

</div>

Well I guess I dont want to be the only one without a view.

Truth is I didnt like the movie, but I appreciated it. When I first got done with it I was at a loss for words, or better yet the only words that came to me were degrading and hurtful. After I had a chance to sit back and think about it I realized that:

1. Nichole Kidman really doesn’t have that nice of a body, I mean she is skinny but…so what?
2. This Kubrick fellow is obviously a nut, but has the balls to tell his ideas. So in my mind that gives him my respect.
3. I dont wish he was dead, I just wish he would stop making movies. So I guess him being dead it a plus for me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Esprix](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/esprix/32/7899_2.png) [@Esprix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Esprix)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/45 "2000-04-04T14:48:00Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Originally posted by **brittainy** :
> 
> I dont wish he was dead, I just wish he would stop making movies. So I guess him being dead it a plus for me.

OK, his being dead aside, how does his making movies in any way, shape or form harm, bother or vex you? If you don’t like his movies, **don’t go to see them.**

I cannot get over this with people lately. Sheesh.

Esprix

* * *

[Ask the Gay Guy!](http://boards.straightdope.com/ubb/Forum7/HTML/001376.html)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sake\_Samurai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Sake\_Samurai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sake_Samurai)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2000, 5:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/46 "2000-04-05T05:41:00Z")

</div>

Kubrick’s no master of film, but he’s still one of the very best directors we’ve had - on par with Scorsece.

I could write several pages here, extolling his virtues (and mentioning his shortcomings) while analyzing his gift for peering into dark human nature, but several of you Kubrick-bashers clearly lack the patience to properly explore a topic and the intelligence to dissect multiple, subtle concepts.

* * *

Yet to be reconciled with the reality of the dark for a moment, I go on wandering from dream to dream.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PunditLisa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4af34b/32.png) [@PunditLisa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PunditLisa)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/47 "2000-04-04T19:51:00Z")

</div>

Yeah, yeah, Sake, we don’t agree with you so we lack intellectual depth.

Obscurity does not equal profundity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sake\_Samurai](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bc79bd/32.png) [@Sake\_Samurai](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sake_Samurai)\
**Post date:** [April 4, 2000, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/48 "2000-04-04T22:03:00Z")

</div>

Now, now, Pundit. . .I was just defending the good director. I don’t recall you particularly attacking him, so my comments were not directed at you.

In fact, even though I disagree with just about all of your criticism of Eyes Wide Shut AND thought that the film was better than most Hollywood fare last year, I STILL did not like the movie on the whole. I can admire much, though. . .a bit too much to say it “sucked”:

**Great**  
Set design  
Costume  
Photography  
Supporting characters  
Character development  
Shot direction and framing  
Lighting  
Sound

**Poor**  
Novella adaptation & interpretation  
Acting by both leads  
Plot advancement  
Editing

* * *

Yet to be reconciled with the reality of the dark for a moment, I go on wandering from dream to dream.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2000, 2:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/49 "2000-04-05T02:26:00Z")

</div>

I don’t like his stuff, he’s not my cup of cold sick. I’ve only seen a couple of his movies, and they were slow and dull and really drove me nuts. The Shining went on for aaaaaaaaaaaaaaages before anything even happened! Even the approach to the house took forever.

Anyway:

> [@](#):
>
> Poor  
> Novella adaptation & interpretation  
> Acting by both leads  
> Plot advancement  
> Editing

For most people, I would’ve thought those factors are more important than the visuals. But then, maybe not. I can’t say I completely understand the average moviegoer.

* * *

[The Legend Of PigeonMan](http://www.hotkey.net.au/~guanolad/pigeonman/)

- **Shadow of the Pigeon** -  
Weirdo of the Night

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2000, 2:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/50 "2000-04-05T02:31:00Z")

</div>

I don’t like his stuff, he’s not my cup of cold sick. I’ve only seen a couple of his movies, and they were slow and dull and really drove me nuts. The Shining went on for aaaaaaaaaaaaaaages before anything even happened! Even the approach to the house took forever.

Anyway:

> [@](#):
>
> Poor  
> Novella adaptation & interpretation  
> Acting by both leads  
> Plot advancement  
> Editing

For most people, I would’ve thought those factors are more important than the visuals. But then, maybe not. I can’t say I completely understand the average moviegoer.

* * *

[The Legend Of PigeonMan](http://www.hotkey.net.au/~guanolad/pigeonman/)

- **Shadow of the Pigeon** -  
Weirdo of the Night

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2000, 2:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/51 "2000-04-05T02:35:00Z")

</div>

I don’t like his stuff, he’s not my cup of cold sick. I’ve only seen a couple of his movies, and they were slow and dull and really drove me nuts. The Shining went on for aaaaaaaaaaaaaaages before anything even happened! Even the approach to the house took forever.

Anyway:

> [@](#):
>
> Poor  
> Novella adaptation & interpretation  
> Acting by both leads  
> Plot advancement  
> Editing

For most people, I would’ve thought those factors are more important than the visuals. But then, maybe not. I can’t say I completely understand the average moviegoer.

* * *

[The Legend Of PigeonMan](http://www.hotkey.net.au/~guanolad/pigeonman/)

- **Shadow of the Pigeon** -  
Weirdo of the Night

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2000, 2:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/52 "2000-04-05T02:38:00Z")

</div>

I don’t like his stuff, he’s not my cup of cold sick. I’ve only seen a couple of his movies, and they were slow and dull and really drove me nuts. The Shining went on for aaaaaaaaaaaaaaages before anything even happened! Even the approach to the house took forever.

Anyway:

> [@](#):
>
> Poor  
> Novella adaptation & interpretation  
> Acting by both leads  
> Plot advancement  
> Editing

For most people, I would’ve thought those factors are more important than the visuals. But then, maybe not. I can’t say I completely understand the average moviegoer.

* * *

[The Legend Of PigeonMan](http://www.hotkey.net.au/~guanolad/pigeonman/)

- **Shadow of the Pigeon** -  
Weirdo of the Night

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PunditLisa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/4af34b/32.png) [@PunditLisa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PunditLisa)\
**Post date:** [April 5, 2000, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575/53 "2000-04-05T21:52:00Z")

</div>

Sake, I agree with your assessment of the film. However, poor acting and poor plot pretty much make any film a sucky film in my opinion. I mean, I’m sure Armageddon had great sound effects and lighting…

On a related note, is “sucky” a word?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stanley-kubrick-im-glad-youre-dead/15575.md?page=2)
