# Star Wars- Digital v.s. Film Screening?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [July 8, 2005, 6:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631 "2005-07-08T18:59:36Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [July 11, 2005, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631/21 "2005-07-11T22:33:13Z")

</div>

> [@ArchiveGuy](#):
>
> None of which is underwater compatible (yet), so for any shot that occurs underwater (there are a couple), that wasn’t digital.
> 
> So, largely (virtually, almost, etc.) is the proper word.

I know they did have a brief water-based sequence, but it wasn’t used in the finished film. Am I forgetting a scene?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Hook](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ccd318/32.png) [@The\_Hook](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Hook)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2005, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631/22 "2005-07-12T00:02:58Z")

</div>

As the troopers shoot down Obi-Wan’s parroptile thingy transport, he falls on water. We are shown his escape (respirator included) from underneath.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2005, 12:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631/23 "2005-07-12T00:20:30Z")

</div>

> [@vibrotronica](#):
>
> There will still be films made on film, just like there are still albums released on vinyl. It will just be a specialty market. And it will be expensive.

I’m more inclined to agree with Cartooniverse, though the timeframe is longer than 20 years. But yes, I think the manufacturing of film stock will be an obsolete industry eventually. That doesn’t mean fetishists won’t try to do it “old school” at incredible cost and effort, but the quality of that stock is likely to not be comparable, which will only fuel the disinterest and eventual conversion of the most ardent film lover.

We in the film archival community are genuinely concerned about this simply because in order to best preserve and restore film elements, we need film stock. This isn’t an indulgence, but a professional necessity, and nobody is optimistic enough to believe the funds will be relatively available to afford the stock once it becomes, out of its rarity, prohibitively expensive.

Of course, by then, the technology may be sufficient (and costs sufficiently low) that everything will eventually be migrated to 1s and 0s. That’s progress marching on, I suppose. But there are still no satisfactory answers on how to address digital longevity, format obsolesence, labor-intensive collection migration, and all the other unknown variables that this new, rapidly-developing technology affords.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MovieMogul](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f08c70/32.png) [@MovieMogul](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MovieMogul)\
**Post date:** [July 12, 2005, 12:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631/24 "2005-07-12T00:21:57Z")

</div>

> [@The Hook](#):
>
> As the troopers shoot down Obi-Wan’s parroptile thingy transport, he falls on water. We are shown his escape (respirator included) from underneath.

Yes, that’s the one, although GuanoLad’s also correct about excised footage that also necessitated underwater shooting. Maybe that’ll be on the DVD…

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-digital-v-s-film-screening/311631.md?page=1)