# Star Wars: The Last Jedi - seen it thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [December 13, 2017, 9:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441 "2017-12-13T21:50:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 17

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TroutMan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/troutman/32/6721_2.png) [@TroutMan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TroutMan)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 4:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/321 "2017-12-20T16:47:07Z")

</div>

> [@Mavic\_Chen](#):
>
> Haven’t seen it, will wait for Bluray. But: Luke is the main character in Star Wars, he practically _is_ Star Wars and his continuing story the epic one fans want to see.

Correction - it was the epic _ **you** _ wanted to see. Many fans, myself included, were satisfied with the conclusion of his story arc and happy that there are new, interesting characters with their own arcs.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Grim\_Render](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/a87d85/32.png) [@Grim\_Render](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Grim_Render)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/322 "2017-12-20T16:55:21Z")

</div>

> [@Mavic\_Chen](#):
>
> Haven’t seen it, will wait for Bluray. But: Luke is the main character in Star Wars, he practically _is_ Star Wars and his continuing story the epic one fans want to see. So why did they kill him off? Makes no sense to me. OK, Han dies in TFA; in part 2 they should have killed off Leia (as obviously the actress is dead in real life) only then kill off Luke in Part 3 so the transformation to the new guard is complete. Why do it in part 2? Basic storytelling people.

A lot of basic storytelling seemed to be missing in general. But it was still a big improvement on the previous one. They seemed to be trying to subvert tropes, while still ripping off the first trilogy and it was hit and miss.

It does say something about how good the first trilogy was when you got all the world-building of the first movies, decades of advances in special effects and such a vast budget and you still fall short of equalling the originals.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Anglachel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/a5b964/32.png) [@Anglachel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Anglachel)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 5:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/323 "2017-12-20T17:15:12Z")

</div>

> [@DigitalC](#):
>
> Not just that, but Rey grew up in a world were force users were known. To Luke it was just magic, most of his training at first was simply getting him to BELIEVE that such a thing as lifting a ship out of a swamp was even possible.

Not sure about this. Luke is 20 years removed from a galaxy where the Jedi were an integral part. Rey is 50+ years removed from that world, but 30 years removed from the ‘legend’ of one guy bringing down the Empire. I would put my money on Luke being more likely to believe, he knew all about the Clone Wars.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lantern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d26b3c/32.png) [@Lantern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lantern)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/324 "2017-12-20T17:22:33Z")

</div>

> [@TroutMan](#):
>
> As for Rey figuring out how to use to Force earlier than Luke, so what? Is it impossible that the Force is stronger in her?

Well sure. In principle, Rey could be so powerful in the Force that she could just sit in one place and finish off the war by herself. It would make for a boring film. The point is that the constraints on Luke’s powers set up interesting choices which drive the story. As does Vader’s power and menace. By contrast Rey and Kylo are much less interesting IMO.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DigitalC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ebca7d/32.png) [@DigitalC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DigitalC)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 5:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/325 "2017-12-20T17:36:12Z")

</div>

> [@Anglachel](#):
>
> Not sure about this. Luke is 20 years removed from a galaxy where the Jedi were an integral part. Rey is 50+ years removed from that world, but 30 years removed from the ‘legend’ of one guy bringing down the Empire. I would put my money on Luke being more likely to believe, he knew all about the Clone Wars.

We don’t have to guess at this though. Luke didn’t know anything about the force or Jedis before he met Old Ben, Rey did know about everything that happened in the original trilogy. We were shown this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RickJay](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/bb73d2/32.png) [@RickJay](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RickJay)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 5:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/326 "2017-12-20T17:37:59Z")

</div>

> [@Happy\_Lendervedder](#):
>
> Disney/Marvel is currently printing money with Marvel characters having their own movies and TV shows, that just keep going on and on with different heroes and baddies. Oh, sure, sometimes the Avengers come together for an epic battle, but there’s a lot of other good stuff happening with Dr. Strange, Jessica Jones, Ant Man, Star Lord, etc in between. I think they might go that route with Star Wars.

This could be good or bad.

On one hand, the “we do this in trilogies” thing can result in some bad choices. To use the reverse example, the prequel trilogy is at best TWO movies, not three; “The Phantom Menace” is wholly irrelevant, and the story could have started with “Attack of the Clones.” The movies have a lot of problems besides that, but that’s a big one; it drags two hours’ worth of plot and exposition over four hours of movie. Had Lucas just made two movies maybe they’d have been better.

So it is with the current set. While I am not a screenwriter I do find it hard to see how all this can be satisfactorily wrapped up in one movie, and not feel wildly rushed. Personally, I would be absolutely okey-dokey with watching an Episode X in 2020 or 2021.

On the other hand,

1. There is something to be said for discipline. JJ Abrams never got anything done in “Lost” because he never had to, as there was always another episode, and when it suddenly came time to end it there was no way to and it become hilariously clear they’d just been writing stuff at random and didn’t know where it was going.

The discipline of working within a constraint is often conducive to good art, and Star Wars itself is an example; it was very hard to make “Star Wars,” with budget and technical limitations, and so Lucas and his team were forced to make hard choices, and in part because of that they turned out an absolutely outstanding movie. If you just give someone carte blanche and a zillion dollars and all the movies they want, why make good stuff?

1. I know I am in the minority on this, but Marvel movies are, IMHO, generally quite shitty. There have been some good ones, like “Iron Man,” but the recent output is becoming like Transformers movies; noisy explosion festivals with too many characters and they’re all starting to look the same. “Black Panther” looks identical to stuff they’ve already made, and “Infinity War” looks atrocious.

If Star Wars just becomes a revenue stream, like Marvel movies have, it will be difficult for them to be any good. It’s not impossible, especially if you hand the keys to different elements of the franchise to different directors and get them competing with one another, but you’re likely to end up with five forgettable “Doctor Strange” and “Thor: Ragnarok” movies for every gem.

The idea of using the Star Wars brand to tell totally different stories is potentially a good one, and it HAS been done in various media; “Clone Wars” is way better than the movies it lies between. and the story behind the video game “Knights of the Old Republic” is better than most of the movies, too. But there’s a lot of shitty Star Wars stuff, too. “Lots of stories in the same universe” is the Marvel approach too, and while they have some gems, most of their movies are mediocre and, really, none have been truly great movies recently.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 5:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/327 "2017-12-20T17:39:15Z")

</div>

> [@DigitalC](#):
>
> We don’t have to guess at this though. Luke didn’t know anything about the force or Jedis before he met Old Ben, Rey did know about everything that happened in the original trilogy. We were shown this.

Luke wasn’t just randomly on a backwater either, he was specifically being hidden (on the planet where his father grew up :smack: , but still), and I assume that his relatives were actively preventing him from learning any more abut jedi and space battles and such as possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HubZilla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ccd318/32.png) [@HubZilla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HubZilla)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 7:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/328 "2017-12-20T19:55:46Z")

</div>

> [@TroutMan](#):
>
> As for Rey figuring out how to use to Force earlier than Luke, so what? Is it impossible that the Force is stronger in her?

Absolutely, if she had a higher midichlorian count!  
(ow, stop hitting me)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 8:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/329 "2017-12-20T20:00:20Z")

</div>

> [@HubZilla](#):
>
> Absolutely, if she had a higher midichlorian count!  
> (ow, stop hitting me)

That’s what it feels like when millions of voices suddenly cry out.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pantastic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3bc359/32.png) [@Pantastic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pantastic)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/330 "2017-12-20T20:06:23Z")

</div>

> [@Lantern](#):
>
> Fine but the problem is that Kylo remains a complete wimp and fails as the main antagonist. In the last film he was beaten by Rey: a complete Jedi novice.

Kylo is one of the toughest force users to appear in the series. He used force abilities that no one else, including Vader, were able to manage like holding a blaster bolt in midair for an extended time (everyone else only manages to deflect them, not stop them). In VII, they made a point of showing how powerful Chewie’s bowcaster was by highlighting the way it flung ordinary stromtroopers back when they got hit. Kylo took a direct hit to the torso from it and not only didn’t get flung back, but basically caught his breath and then kept on fighting. Rey was able to beat him only AFTER he shrugged off a hit from a weapon that usually kills people in one shot.

If you’re going to completely ignore what’s on the screen in order to complain, there’s really no chance you’ll ever like the movies. Kylo Ren is highly emotional, and criticizing the character in that department could be a valid argument (though it’s very thematically consistent with turning away from emotion-hostile Jedi training), but saying that a guy who does force tricks no one else can manage and who shrugs off a hit from an abnormally strong weapon to keep fighting is a ‘wimp’ just isn’t consistent with what’s shown.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lantern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d26b3c/32.png) [@Lantern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lantern)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/331 "2017-12-20T20:29:28Z")

</div>

OK I don’t remember the details of his climactic fight in TFA but I still stand by the statement that he generally comes off as a wimp. First of all he does lose the light-saber levitation face-off with Rey in this film, right? It’s not clear what happens but he is the one who ends up on the floor. And Rey still hasn’t had any training to speak of. And Jedi powers aside, his leadership in the climactic battle is impulsive and stupid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Filbert](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/filbert/32/3433_2.png) [@Filbert](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Filbert)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/332 "2017-12-20T20:59:33Z")

</div>

Meh, so Ren’s not calm and menacing, instead he’s powerful and unpredictable and wants to be scary. Not sure why that’s less interesting as a villain. Yes, he’s in charge when he’s not really competent, I’m pretty sure that’s the point; him and Hux are _supposed_ to be out of their depth and in danger of not holding ‘their’ army together.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lantern](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/d26b3c/32.png) [@Lantern](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lantern)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 9:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/333 "2017-12-20T21:25:44Z")

</div>

> [@Filbert](#):
>
> Yes, he’s in charge when he’s not really competent, I’m pretty sure that’s the point; him and Hux are _supposed_ to be out of their depth and in danger of not holding ‘their’ army together.

The problem is that when the bad guys are lead by a couple of stumblebums, it undermines the sense of menace and renders rather hollow whatever victory is achieved.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 9:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/334 "2017-12-20T21:32:45Z")

</div>

> [@Lantern](#):
>
> The problem is that when the bad guys are lead by a couple of stumblebums, it undermines the sense of menace and renders rather hollow whatever victory is achieved.

I did describe the strategy to a friend as one of depending on the incompetence of the opponent to save you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frylock](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/ce7236/32.png) [@Frylock](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frylock)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 9:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/335 "2017-12-20T21:34:27Z")

</div>

> [@Lantern](#):
>
> The problem is that when the bad guys are lead by a couple of stumblebums, it undermines the sense of menace and renders rather hollow whatever victory is achieved.

Nah, a victory over Trump would be a great victory indeed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mahaloth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mahaloth/32/1079_2.png) [@Mahaloth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mahaloth)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/336 "2017-12-20T21:45:53Z")

</div>

[This is not going to go the way you think: The Last Jedi and the necessary disappointment of epilogues](https://www.avclub.com/this-is-not-going-to-go-the-way-you-think-the-last-jed-1821472840)

Forgive me if it has been posted, but I really liked the above article. Epilogues and re-visiting characters years later is necessarily disappointing.

I think that the article really hits why people both love and hate the movie. It’s disappointing to learn how Han and Luke ended up. I mean…they only won for a bit and Han’s marriage even broke up. But…that is life.

I respect the hell out of Rian Johnson and, dare I say it, even Disney for having the guts to make Episode VIII the way it was. And Episode VII. While I won’t ever love them as much as the original three, I think they contribute something meaningful to the story.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Filbert](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/filbert/32/3433_2.png) [@Filbert](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Filbert)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/337 "2017-12-20T21:55:56Z")

</div>

> [@Lantern](#):
>
> The problem is that when the bad guys are lead by a couple of stumblebums, it undermines the sense of menace and renders rather hollow whatever victory is achieved.

With the rebel army being reduced to about 20 people, having competent leaders on the ‘bad guy’ side would be pushing the boundaries of even Star Wars realism to get a sequel. They’ve got strength but disorganisation on one side vs. a tiny but dedicated group on the other; both have one strength, one glaring weakness.

I just don’t think ‘menacing’ was quite what they were going for. For that to work, they’d either they’d have to come up with something more menacing than Vader, or it would be really unsatisfying. I don’t think they want to try and outdo their godfather of menacing, and I’m quite glad this film didn’t try. Chaotic strength is just as dangerous (insert political joke here).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quercus\_alba](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quercus_alba/32/4061_2.png) [@Quercus\_alba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quercus_alba)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 11:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/338 "2017-12-20T23:13:15Z")

</div>

I’ve been thinking that there MIGHT be something different going on here.  
In the Prequels, the Force is centered in the hands of a couple of competing theocratic priesthoods. In the Trilogy, it is primarily the tool of elite autocrats, and forgotten mythology to the rest. I feel like the two most recent movies are setting forth a more democratic view–a “priesthood of all believers”, something accessible to all, regardless of birth, pedigree, or status. We’ll see if that’s where it’s really going.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DigitalC](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ebca7d/32.png) [@DigitalC](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DigitalC)\
**Post date:** [December 20, 2017, 11:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/339 "2017-12-20T23:30:34Z")

</div>

> [@Lantern](#):
>
> OK I don’t remember the details of his climactic fight in TFA but I still stand by the statement that he generally comes off as a wimp. First of all he does lose the light-saber levitation face-off with Rey in this film, right? It’s not clear what happens but he is the one who ends up on the floor. And Rey still hasn’t had any training to speak of. And Jedi powers aside, his leadership in the climactic battle is impulsive and stupid.

No, the lightsaber breaks and explodes. Rey grew up having to fight just to eat, it might not be official training but she’s not a sheltered farm boy either. Impulsive and stupid is a good description of Kylo though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fair\_Rarity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fair_rarity/32/153_2.png) [@Fair\_Rarity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fair_Rarity)\
**Post date:** [December 21, 2017, 2:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441/340 "2017-12-21T02:28:07Z")

</div>

> [@RickJay](#):
>
> 1. There is something to be said for discipline. JJ Abrams never got anything done in “Lost” because he never had to, as there was always another episode, and when it suddenly came time to end it there was no way to and it become hilariously clear they’d just been writing stuff at random and didn’t know where it was going.

I enjoyed these last three new movies (and I admit publicly again that I liked the prequels. Of course OT is the best, and I can objectively see the problems in all 9 movies, but I enjoyed myself in the theater when I saw them all (er, those of which I am old enough to have seen in theaters), which is really the standard that gets forgotten about).

I’m most worried about the random writing today. I didn’t know that this trilogy is not sketched out until this week. Like … at all. Some of the valid TLJ criticism is that it throws out a lot of the established TFA stuff. Why did it bother to happen one movie ago to be just “Meh, we don’t need it” in the next one? I mean, I do like the openness to try anything, and we all know Lucas wasn’t exactly planning out the whole universe from day one, but maybe having a sketch for the three movies would be nice. You can shove in two suns for closing a character arc and that’s FINE, but it’s hard to do foreshadowing and hints when you don’t know where it’s going.

I think it worked for the most part in TLJ, but I’m worried it’ll end up the awful Kevin Smith movie Red State, where literally every few minutes the entire tone, if not genre, of the movie would change. It was a daring experiment, but it failed for me as a viewer. Is that the direction it’s going to go in now? New writers and directors, no grand plan, going any which way with no cohesive idea other than laser swords? For the movies that are going to be part of the “A long time ago” branch, not the “a star wars story” branch.

I liked TLJ’s surprises, but I don’t need to be shocked and surprised. I want to be engaged and enchanted.

I guess if the new trilogy is fly by the seat of the writers’ pants, causing weird inconsistencies and plot holes, it really is honoring the OT’s legacy, but I would prefer that they knew what they wanted it to be generally and let each writer play in a semi-open sandbox. And I could be worrying for nothing. But like… Rey’s parents. Maybe Kylo was lying, maybe he wasn’t. I think it’s ok they left it as it is. They can go with it or upend it and either would make sense in this one case. However, I worry that there’ll be too many loose threads dangling, too many “aha! you thought this but it’s really that!” You can’t do that with EVERYTHING. You can only “from a certain point of view” so many times. And if you don’t have future stories in mind, the next writer is more likely to come along and be like “Didn’t like that. Let’s make that not have happened.” And it’d be a mess.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441.md?page=16)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/star-wars-the-last-jedi-seen-it-thread/804441.md?page=18)
