# Starving Artist Has Issues With Long Hair

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [July 12, 2009, 6:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775 "2009-07-12T18:49:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 16

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Knorf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/58956e/32.png) [@Knorf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Knorf)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/301 "2009-07-14T16:04:05Z")

</div>

> [@BugMeNot2](#):
>
> Society has deteriorated, as you said. I don’t think any rational, impartial observer would disagree.

This is an opinion–and an exceptionally poorly supported one–_not fact_, and the fact is that many “rational, impartial observers” simply do disagree with your rose-colored glasses view of the 1950s.

> [@](#):
>
> Respect for God has dwindled.  
> Respect for government, police, teachers, etc has dwindled.  
> Respect for parents has dwindled.

There is no solid support for _any_ of these assertions, except that you can indeed show that church-going numbers have been slowly falling. However, this has absolutely nothing to do with deteriorating society (unless you irrationally define it that way _a priori_), since it is perfectly clear that going to church does not necessarily have anything to do with whether a person is civil and polite.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/302 "2009-07-14T16:18:05Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> A fair point, but he didn’t distinguish between the two; he simply said that teen promiscuity has led to an explosion in the teen pregnancy rate, which is simply not the case.

As mentioned, it is difficult to see how promiscuity could cause married pregnancy. If you are alleging that the majority of married teen-agers were pregnant when they married in 1957, I would like to see a cite.

In a sense, the drastic shift from married teen pregnancy in 1957 to unmarried now is a partial explanation for the confusion. The default assumption was that pregnancy = marriage. Now it is not, and it is valid to assume in 2009 that a pregnant teen-ager is not married. Thus use of the term “teen-age pregnancy” in 2009 refers to a different phenomenon than it did fifty years ago. “Pregnant teen-ager” is a social problem now; it was not nearly so much in 1957. This is due to a number of factors - invention and widespread use of the Pill led to a loosening of social mores against illegitimacy, thus teen-agers dumb enough to have unprotected sex became more common. And the loosening also of welfare policy led to diminished consequences for the unmarried woman, and up to 80% of pregnant teens nowadays wind up on welfare.

The cite provided gives an interesting reason for the recent decline -

> [@](#):
>
> The AGI analysis concluded that approximately one-quarter of the decline in teenage pregnancy in the United States between 1988 and 1995 was due to increased abstinence.

Also interesting is that the first time the rate dropped below 100 was shortly after welfare reform was passed by the Republican Congress.

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> Shodan is still remarkably short sighted and unable to appreciate nuance.

Oh no, I understand nuance just fine. It’s just that assholes like to pile on whoever dissents from the worship of the sacred cows hereabouts.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/303 "2009-07-14T16:25:33Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Oh no, I understand nuance just fine. It’s just that assholes like to pile on whoever dissents from the worship of the sacred cows hereabouts.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

In other words, you perfectly understand that your cite doesn’t tell the whole story. You just dishonestly posted it without caveat because you wanted to stand by Starving Artist’s side, since you know, you both share the same brand of stupid?

How sweet. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/304 "2009-07-14T16:25:51Z")

</div>

> [@Knorf](#):
>
> going to church does not necessarily have anything to do with whether a person is civil and polite.

No, unfortunately you are wrong about that too.

[Cite](http://biblioteca.universia.net/html_bura/ficha/params/id/42535066.html), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Religion/BG1064.cfm), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Smith,%20Abstract,%20Religion%20and%20Civic%20Engagement%20in%20the%20United%20States%201972-2006%20.PDF), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Mencken%20and%20Bader,%20Abstract,%20Volunteering%20and%20Religion%20-Evidence%20from%20the%20Baylor%20Religion%20Survey%20.PDF), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Wallace,%20abstract,%20Religiosity%20and%20Adolescent%20Substance%20Abuse%20.PDF), [etc.](http://www.familyfacts.org/).

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/305 "2009-07-14T16:28:52Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> No, unfortunately you are wrong about that too.
> 
> [Cite](http://biblioteca.universia.net/html_bura/ficha/params/id/42535066.html), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Religion/BG1064.cfm), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Smith,%20Abstract,%20Religion%20and%20Civic%20Engagement%20in%20the%20United%20States%201972-2006%20.PDF), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Mencken%20and%20Bader,%20Abstract,%20Volunteering%20and%20Religion%20-Evidence%20from%20the%20Baylor%20Religion%20Survey%20.PDF), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Wallace,%20abstract,%20Religiosity%20and%20Adolescent%20Substance%20Abuse%20.PDF), [etc.](http://www.familyfacts.org/).
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Well shit, if the heritage foundations says it, where do I sign?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/306 "2009-07-14T16:32:02Z")

</div>

What’s nice is that if you google-search the phrase “a retard swinging a length of barbed wire”, there’s only one single place that phrase appears, and it was on the SDMB in regards to **Starving Artist**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/307 "2009-07-14T16:35:27Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Knorf]  
going to church does not necessarily have anything to do with whether a person is civil and polite.  
[/QUOTE]

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> No, unfortunately you are wrong about that too.
> 
> [Cite](http://biblioteca.universia.net/html_bura/ficha/params/id/42535066.html), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Religion/BG1064.cfm), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Smith,%20Abstract,%20Religion%20and%20Civic%20Engagement%20in%20the%20United%20States%201972-2006%20.PDF), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Mencken%20and%20Bader,%20Abstract,%20Volunteering%20and%20Religion%20-Evidence%20from%20the%20Baylor%20Religion%20Survey%20.PDF), [cite](http://www.heritage.org/Research/Features/Religion/Docs/Wallace,%20abstract,%20Religiosity%20and%20Adolescent%20Substance%20Abuse%20.PDF), [etc.](http://www.familyfacts.org/).
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

Or not. From your first citation:

> [@](#):
>
> The findings indicate that spirituality, rather than public or private religious practice, influences moral reasoning. Furthermore, private religious practice tends to have more positive influence than spirituality on social attitudes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/308 "2009-07-14T16:37:04Z")

</div>

> [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](#):
>
> What’s nice is that if you google-search the phrase “a retard swinging a length of barbed wire”, there’s only one single place that phrase appears, and it was on the SDMB in regards to **Starving Artist**.

Hey I posted that! 😃

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> At least Scylla is charismatic. Stupid, simple and laughably obtuse, but he’s likable. SA is as endearing as a retard swinging a length of barbed wire.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/309 "2009-07-14T16:44:47Z")

</div>

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> Well shit, if the heritage foundations says it, where do I sign?

While it’s true that the Heritage Foundation’s website hosts these articles, they don’t (at a brief glance) appear to be works from the Heritage Foundation, but rather different studies conducted by different people.

It’s fair to suggest that the Heritage Foundation would only choose to host studies that support this viewpoint, of course, but you can’t claim that the studies themselves are flawed by the mere fact that the Heritage Foundation hosts a copy of them at their website. You have to supply other studies showing the opposite conclusion, or describe the flaws in these studies that renders them unreliable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/310 "2009-07-14T16:57:58Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> you can’t claim that the studies themselves are flawed by the mere fact that the Heritage Foundation hosts a copy of them at their website.

The genetic fallacy forms the foundation of a good third of political discourse hereabouts.

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Or not. From your first citation:

We were talking about social attitudes like being civil and polite. As the cite says, private religious practice has the greater effect on social attitudes.

And people get all bent around the axle when **Starving Artist** doesn’t bother with cites. Three quarters of you can’t read, and the other half can’t count.

🙂

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/311 "2009-07-14T16:58:44Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> While it’s true that the Heritage Foundation’s website hosts these articles, they don’t (at a brief glance) appear to be works from the Heritage Foundation, but rather different studies conducted by different people.
> 
> It’s fair to suggest that the Heritage Foundation would only choose to host studies that support this viewpoint, of course, but you can’t claim that the studies themselves are flawed by the mere fact that the Heritage Foundation hosts a copy of them at their website. You have to supply other studies showing the opposite conclusion, or describe the flaws in these studies that renders them unreliable.

Oh I know how to debate. And the basic rules of logical discourse, that’s how I schooled Shodan earlier. But I don’t particularly care about the particular issue.

The first cite is about a seminary, so I don’t really see how that is on point. The second is an opinion piece written by someone who obviously likes religion and wants to champion it. The third is an opinion piece. The fourth is about volunteering, which I’m not sure relates to stability of society. The fifth is about substance abuse but doesn’t mention about controlling for economic level.

In any case these are crudely scanned abstracts, not the actual data, so I don’t know what they are trying to prove. Shodan just did a quick websearch and posted rubbish hoping no-one would look at them.

Why refute rubbish when I’ve got better things to do?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/312 "2009-07-14T17:02:55Z")

</div>

Yes, I thought you looked pretty stupid too.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lobohan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lobohan/32/79_2.png) [@Lobohan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lobohan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/313 "2009-07-14T17:04:18Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> Yes, I thought you looked pretty stupid too.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

No U!

😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/314 "2009-07-14T17:09:13Z")

</div>

> [@Lobohan](#):
>
> Hey I posted that! 😃

I have to say it’s one of my favorite lines - I laugh every time it comes to mind, and whenever I see something from Starving Artist, it comes to mind.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JonScribe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/3be4f8/32.png) [@JonScribe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JonScribe)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/315 "2009-07-14T17:11:13Z")

</div>

> [@samclem](#):
>
> All I know is we _never_ had to lock our doors in the 1950s and earlier. Now we do. That is all.

Depends whose door you’re talking about there, Beav.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/316 "2009-07-14T17:11:40Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> We were talking about social attitudes like being civil and polite. As the cite says, private religious practice has the greater effect on social attitudes.

Private religious practice by definition doesn’t involve “going to church”. Try again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/317 "2009-07-14T17:17:24Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> While it’s true that the Heritage Foundation’s website hosts these articles, they don’t (at a brief glance) appear to be works from the Heritage Foundation, but rather different studies conducted by different people.
> 
> It’s fair to suggest that the Heritage Foundation would only choose to host studies that support this viewpoint, of course, but you can’t claim that the studies themselves are flawed by the mere fact that the Heritage Foundation hosts a copy of them at their website. You have to supply other studies showing the opposite conclusion, or describe the flaws in these studies that renders them unreliable.

Actually, what I was able to see weren’t studies. They were abstracts of papers or posters - some that didn’t even seem to be data based, and several that weren’t clearly published papers. I wasn’t able to click through to all of them - for some reason they load very slowly.

The last one has to do with religiousity and substance use, which I’m not sure is very good as a stand-in for civility and niceness.

Interestingly, the fourth (IIRC) abstract is weird - it leads by saying that there is an association between volunteerism and church attendance, but then goes on to say that there was little difference between Catholics, evangelical Protestants, mainstream Protestants, and those with no religious affiliation. I don’t understand how those with no affiliation could be sampled for church attendance. The problem is that since this is an abstract of something that isn’t clearly in publication anywhere, there’s no way to evaluate its methods or claims.

It could also be that some of these were drawn from poster sessions at some unspecified convention or institutional activity, meaning that they would not have been subjected to much real scrutiny, and could be the product of a student.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shodan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/9f8e36/32.png) [@Shodan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shodan)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/318 "2009-07-14T17:22:21Z")

</div>

> [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](#):
>
> Private religious practice by definition doesn’t involve “going to church”. Try again.

Just what exactly do you think early morning seminary is?

Discussion is one thing, but this is getting ridiculous.

Regards,  
Shodan

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RedFury](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/ec9cab/32.png) [@RedFury](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RedFury)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/319 "2009-07-14T17:22:58Z")

</div>

Looks like **Starvin’** made an emergency bugle call…and The 101st Fighting Keyboard Brigade has, once again, come through.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [July 14, 2009, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775/320 "2009-07-14T17:27:59Z")

</div>

**Carol Stream** , if we ever needed you, we need you now…

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775.md?page=15)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/starving-artist-has-issues-with-long-hair/502775.md?page=17)
