# State of Florida vs. George Zimmerman Trial Thread

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [June 20, 2013, 8:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501 "2013-06-20T20:32:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aceplace57](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aceplace57/32/3500_2.png) [@aceplace57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aceplace57)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 8:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/101 "2013-06-25T20:36:43Z")

</div>

I expect the various eyewitness testimony to offer conflicting details. These people were inside homes and looking out into a very dark area. The details will be a little different between witnesses.

I don’t understand the significance of the left to right movement. The defense is really questioning it. Bahadoor seems pretty hostile to the defense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![steronz](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steronz/32/11765_2.png) [@steronz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/steronz)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/102 "2013-06-25T20:39:11Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> I don’t understand the significance of the left to right movement. The defense is really questioning it. Bahadoor seems pretty hostile to the defense.

She seems pretty clueless, no hostile. He’s backing her into corners and she doesn’t know how to react. I’m not sure if he’s hammering on her because the left-to-right would be damaging to the defense, or if this is just standard witness discrediting. I don’t watch a lot of trials.

eta: There’s a stark difference between the government employees, who have likely testified at dozens or hundreds of trials, and this civilian.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steophan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steophan/32/9595_2.png) [@Steophan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steophan)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 8:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/103 "2013-06-25T20:57:34Z")

</div>

> [@hmarvin](#):
>
> The person who collected the crime scene evidence couldn’t find any of Trayvon’s blood, despite the fact he was laying face down. She couldn’t find Zimmerman’s DNA on the slide and trigger of his gun. You know he had to have pulled the trigger. If you can’t find Zimmerman’s DNA and fingerprints on his own gun, how do they expect to prove Martin didn’t reach for it? If they can’t find Martin’s blood on the grass, or anywhere else at the scene, how can they prove that Zimmerman didn’t have his head pounded on the concrete, which is what they’re implying?

If the lack of Zimmerman’s blood or DNA on Martin’s hands shows he didn’t attack him, doesn’t the lack of Martin’s blood or DNA at the scene show he wasn’t shot there? It doesn’t make sense to only use it one way.

Anyway, more evidence in favour of Zimmerman.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![aceplace57](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/aceplace57/32/3500_2.png) [@aceplace57](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/aceplace57)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/104 "2013-06-25T21:40:33Z")

</div>

Bahadoor admitted she signed a petition to prosecute Trayvon’s killer. I’d say shes been discredited by the defense.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 9:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/105 "2013-06-25T21:49:10Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> Bahadoor admitted she signed a petition to prosecute Trayvon’s killer. I’d say shes been discredited by the defense.

The second sentence does not follow from the first. (I’m not sure if you intended it to.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Honesty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@Honesty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Honesty)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/106 "2013-06-25T21:51:51Z")

</div>

Today’s trial was, again, awesome for the prosecution. They played tapes of previous 911 tapes made by George Zimmerman. What did they all have in common? They all began “There is someone suspicious here” “I don’t know what his deal is” "He’s black “He’s African-American” over and over and over again in separate phone calls. The same characteristics he used for Trayvon, he used for a host of other African-Americans that he profiled. Interestingly, in all of the tapes played, he _refused_ to confront the person who he reported which is in stark contrast to his behavior with Trayvon. Why is that? It’s because Trayvon was a teenager and he didn’t want to let “those fucking punks” get away.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fotheringay-Phipps](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/d9b06d/32.png) [@Fotheringay-Phipps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fotheringay-Phipps)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 9:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/107 "2013-06-25T21:56:03Z")

</div>

> [@Honesty](#):
>
> They played tapes of previous 911 tapes made by George Zimmerman. What did they all have in common? They all began “There is someone suspicious here” “I don’t know what his deal is” "He’s black “He’s African-American” over and over and over again in separate tapes. The same characteristics he used for Trayvon, he used for a host of other African-Americans that he profiled.

Any detail on what percentage of those people actually were up to no good?

> [@](#):
>
> Interestingly, in all of the tapes played, he _refused_ to confront the person who he reported which is in stark contrast to his behavior with Trayvon. Why is that?

This is circular. You’re assuming he decided to confront Trayvon.

IMO, the fact you’ve pointed to argues the opposite - that he was not a wannabe cop who liked to confront people, safe in the knowlege that he had a gun (as many have argued) and most likely did not in fact decide to confront Trayvon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steophan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steophan/32/9595_2.png) [@Steophan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steophan)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 10:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/108 "2013-06-25T22:05:57Z")

</div>

Yes, because phoning the police about suspicious people is a negative character trait… That’s hardly going to reflect badly on him, assuming the jury isn’t made up of career criminals.

These calls, along with the evidence that he refused to work with the police when offered, demolish the notion that he was a “wannabe cop”. What he wanted was for the cops to do their job, not do it for them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Honesty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@Honesty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Honesty)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/109 "2013-06-25T22:19:09Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=FP]  
Any detail on what percentage of those people actually were up to no good?  
[/QUOTE]

From your mouth to the Defense’s ears. Let’s hope they can find that answer quick.

> [@Steophan](#):
>
> Yes, because phoning the police about suspicious people is a negative character trait..

Of course not, but when you the same words to characterize other black men the same way he did Trayvon, it’s almost as if he was running on a script. “There’s someone suspicious here,” “I don’t know what his deal is”. It reminds me of the Ms. Swan skits on _MadTV_ where she described every male as “He looka like a man”. Eventually, in this skit, you become desensitized to that description because you realize it’s how she describes _everyone_ like that. Same with Mr. Zimmerman.

[QUOTE=FP]  
This is circular. You’re assuming he decided to confront Trayvon.  
[/QUOTE]

Isn’t that what the prosecution is arguing?

[QUOTE=FP]  
IMO, the fact you’ve pointed to argues the opposite - that he was not a wannabe cop who liked to confront people, safe in the knowlege that he had a gun (as many have argued) and most likely did not in fact decide to confront Trayvon.  
[/QUOTE]

Nah, the people who he profiled were adults, not teenagers. Vultures don’t attack the strong.

- Honesty

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 10:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/110 "2013-06-25T22:27:54Z")

</div>

> [@Honesty](#):
>
> Today’s trial was, again, awesome for the prosecution. They played tapes of previous 911 tapes made by George Zimmerman.

I believe defense objected yesterday to playing those tapes and the judge said today she will review the objections and decide by the end of the day whether to allow those tapes in court. In the live blogging I saw today I saw no mention of playing the “previous 911 tapes”. Are you sure?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Steophan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/steophan/32/9595_2.png) [@Steophan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Steophan)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 10:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/111 "2013-06-25T22:33:37Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> I believe defense objected yesterday to playing those tapes and the judge said today she will review the objections and decide by the end of the day whether to allow those tapes in court. In the live blogging I saw today I saw no mention of playing the “previous 911 tapes”. Are you sure?

[This Orlando Sentinel article](http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/trayvon-martin/os-george-zimmerman-trial-day-12-20130625,0,4929825.story?page=2) says that the judge listened to the tapes, but not that they were played to the jury. It looks like she hasn’t made her ruling yet.

> [@](#):
>
> The judge did not rule immediately after hearing argument. She did listen to the calls, in which Zimmerman reports other male African Americans he viewed as suspicious to police for various reasons. The calls took place between August 2011 and February 2012.

Looks like **Honesty** is, once again, not living up to his username.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doorhinge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a5b964/32.png) [@doorhinge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doorhinge)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 11:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/112 "2013-06-25T23:20:40Z")

</div>

> [@Honesty](#):
>
> …Of course not, but when you the same words to characterize other black men the same way he did Trayvon, it’s almost as if he was running on a script. “There’s someone suspicious here,” “I don’t know what his deal is”. It reminds me of the Ms. Swan skits on _MadTV_ where she described every male as “He looka like a man”. Eventually, in this skit, you become desensitized to that description because you realize it’s how she describes _everyone_ like that. Same with Mr. Zimmerman.
> 
> - Honesty

The prosecution cherrypicked 6 calls from GZ where GZ referred to suspicious people as black males. The prosecution didn’t chose the other 30 plus calls GZ made. I wonder why? Was it because they didn’t contain referrences to black males?

The judge hasn’t allowed the jury to hear any of these 6 selected calls yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Terr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/839c29/32.png) [@Terr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Terr)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/113 "2013-06-25T23:24:41Z")

</div>

Some interesting points from testimony from _prosecution witnesses_ today. Seems like they should have been defense witnesses instead.

- O’Brien, president of the HOA: describes how the burglar was caught in the area because some workers saw him, thought him suspicious and (drum roll) “followed him from a distance”. O’Brien thought that was great. A gimme for the defense.

- Wendy Dorival, the police Neighborhood Watch coordinator.

on re-cross:

```
Guy: What lead you to recommend Zimmerman for patrol?
Dorival answers that she thought he was interested an responsible.

```

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![doorhinge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/a5b964/32.png) [@doorhinge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/doorhinge)\
**Post date:** [June 25, 2013, 11:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/114 "2013-06-25T23:34:37Z")

</div>

> [@aceplace57](#):
>
> I expect the various eyewitness testimony to offer conflicting details. These people were inside homes and looking out into a very dark area. The details will be a little different between witnesses.
> 
> I don’t understand **the significance of the left to right movement.** The defense is really questioning it. Bahadoor seems pretty hostile to the defense.

IMHO, the left-to-right movement suddenly remembered by Bahadoor, if true, would show that the confrontation started much farther away from the “T” and closer to (relatively-speaking) TM’s father’s girlfriend’s home than has been previous discussed on the internet. The place where the prosecution intends to show the 2nd confrontation started hasn’t been introduced to the court yet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hmarvin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/858c86/32.png) [@hmarvin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hmarvin)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2013, 12:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/115 "2013-06-26T00:05:39Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> Some interesting points from testimony from _prosecution witnesses_ today. Seems like they should have been defense witnesses instead.
> 
> - O’Brien, president of the HOA: describes how the burglar was caught in the area because some workers saw him, thought him suspicious and (drum roll) “followed him from a distance”. O’Brien thought that was great. A gimme for the defense.
> 
> - Wendy Dorival, the police Neighborhood Watch coordinator.
> 
> on re-cross:
> 
> ```
> Guy: What lead you to recommend Zimmerman for patrol?
> Dorival answers that she thought he was interested an responsible.
> 
> ```

A rational person would conclude the prosecutors are getting their butts kicked.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hmarvin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/858c86/32.png) [@hmarvin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hmarvin)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2013, 12:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/116 "2013-06-26T00:09:54Z")

</div>

> [@doorhinge](#):
>
> IMHO, the left-to-right movement suddenly remembered by Bahadoor, if true, would show that the confrontation started much farther away from the “T” and closer to (relatively-speaking) TM’s father’s girlfriend’s home than has been previous discussed on the internet. The place where the prosecution intends to show the 2nd confrontation started hasn’t been introduced to the court yet.

The problem the prosecutors have is that Trayvon, if DD is telling the truth about him just walking, shouldn’t have been near the T, unless he has the foot speed of a box turtle. One way around this is to have Zimmerman chasing him back and forth along that path. Which makes no more sense, but what the heck.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2013, 12:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/117 "2013-06-26T00:33:13Z")

</div>

The left-to-right movement reported by the witness is damaging to the defense because it indicates two things: 1) the altercation started south of the T contrary to what Zimmerman claimed and 2) the fight traveled signficantly before the kid was shot…which again contradicts Zimmerman’s story.

The witness also reported seeing two people standing up during most of the exchange. Not only does this contradict Z, but this contradicts W6, who says he saw two guys on the ground.

With the way the defense pounced on Witness 1, they might as well have held up a sign announcing to the jury that their Achille’s heels are getting trampled on. If the fight traveled, who was chasing whom? Why would Zimmerman lie about the trajectory if he’d been the one being chased? How did the fight start south of the T, if Zimmerman called off his search for the kid? These are questions an intelligent juror should be considering.

O’Mara badgered the witness but didn’t succeed in getting her to recant these claims. In addition, witnesses can sign all the petitions they want and still be credible. Exercising one’s 5th amendment rights doesn’t suddenly turn someone into a liar. The fact that O’Mara had to grasp at such a straw should be another clue to the jury that the defense’s case is a shaky as a house of cards.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Honesty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@Honesty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Honesty)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2013, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/118 "2013-06-26T00:41:59Z")

</div>

> [@Steophan](#):
>
> [This Orlando Sentinel article](http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/local/trayvon-martin/os-george-zimmerman-trial-day-12-20130625,0,4929825.story?page=2) says that the judge listened to the tapes, but not that they were played to the jury. It looks like she hasn’t made her ruling yet.
> 
> Looks like **Honesty** is, once again, not living up to his username.

Dude, you’re so paranoid. I listened to the tapes from the recorded stream which you can listen to[here](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xMHuEOV6z-o). I never said nor implied that the jury listened to the tapes, was simply expressing excitement that the evidence was presented. Jesus Christ, there’s no man behind the curtain. I would beg that you pay more attention to the message rather than the messenger. Or, if it helps you, use the ignore feature to ignore my posts altogether.

Thank you.

- Honesty

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Honesty](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/f04885/32.png) [@Honesty](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Honesty)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2013, 12:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/119 "2013-06-26T00:46:40Z")

</div>

> [@Terr](#):
>
> I believe defense objected yesterday to playing those tapes and the judge said today she will review the objections and decide by the end of the day whether to allow those tapes in court. In the live blogging I saw today I saw no mention of playing the “previous 911 tapes”. Are you sure?

Yes, the tapes were played in front of the judge. You can see it in the link in my previous post.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![you\_with\_the\_face](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/ecccb3/32.png) [@you\_with\_the\_face](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/you_with_the_face)\
**Post date:** [June 26, 2013, 12:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501/120 "2013-06-26T00:47:09Z")

</div>

> [@hmarvin](#):
>
> So much for George Zimmerman being a “wannabe cop.” Wendy Dorival just testified that the SPD, because George Zimmerman was such a good guy, wanted him to be a 'citizen on patrol", and George Zimmerman turned down the SPD. LOL.

Consider the possibility that he turned down “citizen on patrol” because he would have been subjected to a background check. SPD had no idea whether Zimmerman was good or not because they didn’t know anything about his past.

He committed the act of patrolling when followed Martin in his truck and then on foot, so if anything, this testimony damages Zimmerman.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501.md?page=5)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/state-of-florida-vs-george-zimmerman-trial-thread/661501.md?page=7)
