What proof do you have of this? In your opinion, “racists” are an irrational bunch that attempt to use genetics to construct narratives to keep “others” down. You’re toting the marxist line. I’m sure that you can cite all sorts of clever psychoanalyses that expound this, but what evidence do you have that these analysis, these intellectual stances, are correct? Why are you supposing that “racists” are motivated by the desire to believe in black inferiority? Why not suppose that “racist” conclude that blacks are inferior based on the preponderance of the evidence? It seems to me that “anti-racists” are bent in believing that “racists” are bent in believing that blacks are inferior, so that you don’t have to debate them or provide evidence to the contrary.
The problems that I have is that “anti-racists” inevitably accuse me of racism for “keeping the black man down.” When I say nothing, they take this as an admission of guilt. When I try to point out alternative explanations, cultural or genetic, for some of the “disparities,” I am accused of “just hating black people.” When I try to explain why I do what I do, I’m accused of rationalizing my supposed hatred and so on. So I don’t bother trying to show that I’m not “racist”; in fact, I’ve come to think that this thing called “racism” probably isn’t that bad after all. What I do now is simply demand proof that “blacks” are not “inferior” (i.e. that the statistical average differences commonly said to be the product of my racism is not, in fact, a product of aggregate genetic differences) and make my case that the difference could reasonably be due to genetics.