So, to clarify, you don’t care and it doesn’t annoy you. Yet it merited you calling him a douchebag and a putz in your first post in this thread
So how are we to judge when something does rise to the level of annoying you?
They should print that picture on his diploma. 
It’s farce. Always has been. The fact it’s indistinguishable from a real religion is part of the joke.
I included a Smilie in that post.
I can’t claim credit for the putz comment. People with cone shaped hats have been called that long before I was born. An example.
Yeah, because the pasta strainer is cone shaped. Bullshit.
So, to clarify, you agree it is just as much a religion as any other yes?
No, not at all. It’s an example of Clarke’s Third Law of Internet Trolling, in which a sufficiently well-crafted satire is indistinguishable from the actual article.
Not calling you a troll, or any other Doper. But that page went whoosh as it passed by.
But you dodge. In what way is it not a valid religion? How do you know?