This is from “An Empirical Assessment Of Student Loan Discharges And The Undue Hardship Standard” by Jason Iuliano at Harvard University - Law School - Alumni; Princeton University - Department of Politics, July 24, 2011
It is incorrect to say that federal tax owed is not dischargeable in bankruptcy as a blanket rule (though there are restrictions).
That’s almost as funny as “Keep your government hands off my Medicare.”
Yeah, but what about Zombie National Back where they reposes your BRAAAAAAAAINS if you default on the loan?
It’s like preferring herpes over AIDS.
You read some amazing things on the internet. You know most of the world looks in horror at the American student loans system, and most of them don’t burden themselves with such a thing in the first place.
And yet more foreign students come to the United States to study than anywhere else in the world.
Not that I think the student loan system is particularly great, but the fact is the vast majority of students have a reasonable (or zero) amount of student debt and invest it in a useful education. The stories you hear of people taking out $75k in private federally-backed loans so they can get a postmodernist puppetry degree at a New England SLAC are not actually that common.
The current system sucks, but if federal student loans are bankrupting you, you are doing it wrong.
Income based repayment WILL keep your loans, however high, capped to a reasonable percent of your income. And they benefit even people with pretty decent incomes. After 20 years (or 10 if you work in government or nonprofits) the loans are forgiven (though you will owe taxes on the forgiven portion).
Few people use income based repayment, and it’s kind of baffling. But anyone railing about how federal student loan debt has ruined their life is either hamming it up or extremely Ill-informed.
FWIW the average layman’s theory of what is and is not a useful degree is generally way off.
MrQwertasd, out of curiosity, who would pay for the education for people living in your anarchy zones? I can’t imagine that private universities and banks, completely ungoverned, would provide student loans less onerous than those subsidized by the US government.
With easy credit, consumers are shielded from the “true” cost of things, and prices can escalate steeply. Similar to US market health insurance, but that’s for another thread.
God, I can. You could dump all that fractional reserve sorcery, ignore national debts because there is no nation, crowd fund it, do it for love, learn from your peers, do without universities altogether, do without money, do it with bitcoin, use an Islamic non-usurous bank, run through a field naked. Anything.
The UK tripled it’s fees only because the dickhead government kow-towed to the banks who destroyed a chunk of the economy - which kind of proves that the state is already half anarchic and lawless anyway - which admittedly isn’t a good argument for anarchy as far as that goes, but in this case government serves the banks who are the hierarchy.
It’s a good question, I shall look into this. Initial research finds - http://www.newuniversity.ca/inspiring-schools/52-canada/93-anarchist-free-university
Student loans would be the work of Santa.
Don’t mix up me threads plz
If student loans are the work of Satan, shouldn’t college applicants refuse to accept them? If you make a pact with Satan, you shouldn’t complain about the terms when he comes to collect.
Seems to me the OP is okay with people borrowing money. It only becomes wrong when it’s time to pay the money back.
It’s such a shame that people don’t know any better, I guess if you’re born into a debt based society then you think of it as normal. Bit like people born in a dysfunctional family think daily beatings are normal.
If everyone else believes in debt, then it is normal. That’s what normal means.
People borrow money to go to college because they expect they will earn more money with a college degree. You may have some imaginary alternative for paying for tuition, but no college is accepting imaginary money at this time.
Do you seriously propose full reserve banking, or are you just vomiting talking points?
Well, that answers that question.
Anything except doing things which work at a basic level.
Look, the current system is imperfect. It’s like a broken leg. The standard of care for a human with a broken leg isn’t amputation, nor is it total amputation of everything below the diaphragm and replacement of all of the major organs down there with pixie dust and bullshit. The standard of care is to fix the leg, make sure you aren’t causing any other problems, and then do therapy to make sure the whole system has healed correctly.
You, on the other hand, are waving a bone saw and a gas can around, raving about how any imperfection can only be cured in the cleansing fire of total destruction.
“Rage quit” isn’t a valid political stance.
It would be quicker if you just listed the things you do actually understand.
Just saying.
CMC fnord!
For. The. Win.
(About the only thing left is to ask if he wants his BBQ sauce Regular, Carolina style, Texas style, or a St Louis Dry Rub)
Exactly.
If the loan is “forgiven,” it still needs to be paid back by… someone. Who will pay it back?
North or South…there is a difference.