Duffer,
To rehash an oft gone through Race thread …
There is no debate that there are differences between different subpopulations of people. Biologically the question of significance is what differences travel with what other differences and to what degree of correlation. What are the subpopulations of significance? From this perspective certain alleles can be shown to travel with other alleles, certain disease state risks can be shown to travel with certain alleles. Much can be learned about our migratory histories by an open minded investigatiion of determining what these subpopulations of humanity are. This scientific inquiry demands that you do not begin the investigation with an answer already in mind.
“Race” as a biological construct obstructs such an open ended inquiry. It presents an answer in advance of the data. It declares that a particular set of superficial (ie easily observable) characteristics that have led to self and external group identification are the meaningful characteristics for other items of biological interest. It is looking under a particular lamppost becuase that is where the light’s good. This is not an ideal scientific approach.
This does not mean that there is no correlation between race and items of biological significance.
First off genetic predisposition can statistically be correlated with race. Sickle cell is statistically more common among Blacks than Whites. In the abscence of more specific markers, racial status can increase or decrease the probability of an individual responding to certain medications in various ways, suggesting different sorts of antihypertensives or different therapy after a renal transplant. In the abscence of more specific markers. But that is so very key. Because while sometimes we may need to only look where the light is good, we be foolish to belieeve that our keys can only be there: the subpopulation of interest is really a set of particular alleles which correlates with these disease states and medication responses (and who knows what other phenotypes) with a great deal more vigor.
Secondly the sociologic construct has biologic significance because of its ramifications. If someone identifies (or is identified) as a member of a particular group, then they are statistically more likely to be part of the culture of that group. Eat particular foods prepared in particular ways more or less often. Have differing approaches to health maintainance. Different access to health care. Be treated differently. Different accss to educational institutions of similar quality. So on. All of which have may have measurable biological effects.
Race as a sociologic construct is very real. And, bringing this back to this thread, one wonders if the existance of this award is more racist in its implication than anything the suspended students did. Maybe a Martin Luther King Memorial Award, open to all, based on public service contributions to issues of racial equality, academics, and need, in some balance, would be a more fitting remembrance of the day. (Save the African-American only award for Malcolm X Day.)
Eve,
I had Jewish South African freinds (a family) back in medical school/residency. They had emigrated to the US in the early 80’s. Their experience was that Afrikaners had kept mostly to themselves, apart from Jews as well, and until he had to serve in the military he had hoped that Afrikaners would peacably power share. After he met up with more of them in his military service he became convinced that they were so stupid and stubborn that no peaceful solution would ever be found and decided to leave. (Fortunately, history has shown him wrong.)