# Stupid Examples of Misogyny

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [December 27, 2022, 11:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187 "2022-12-27T23:06:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sylvanz](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@Sylvanz](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sylvanz)\
**Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 5:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/121 "2022-12-30T05:37:14Z")

</div>

It did go that way I remember it clearly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MandaJo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ac91a4/32.png) [@MandaJo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MandaJo)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 2:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/122 "2023-01-01T14:13:02Z")

</div>

> [@themapleleaf](#):
>
> I think it was justified using the argument that the proximity of the opposite sex should not distract one from one’s prayers.

I feel like the main impact of a policy like that would be to send the message that people were church members first, family members second.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TruCelt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/trucelt/32/523_2.png) [@TruCelt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TruCelt)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/123 "2023-01-01T20:49:37Z")

</div>

> [@MandaJo](#):
>
> I feel like the main impact of a policy like that would be to send the message that people were church members first, family members second.

It would also force fathers to actually involve themselves in watching over at least half the children in the room. No help for a woman with five daughters, but a slight respite for many. And it sends a message to the Dads.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/124 "2023-01-01T21:16:02Z")

</div>

Except that children under a certain age were probably on the women’s side with their mother, regardless of the gender of the children.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 9:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/125 "2023-01-01T21:20:08Z")

</div>

> [@ZonexandScout](#):
>
> So…maybe not misogynism after all.

I don’t think you can draw that conclusion. If you have a misogynistic objective to make women “cover up”, but you want to make give it a _veneer_ of equal treatment to people visiting who might have other sensibilities and cause a fuss, tell everyone to do it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![suranyi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e36b37/32.png) [@suranyi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/suranyi)\
**Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 10:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/126 "2023-01-01T22:16:07Z")

</div>

There are similar dress rules at the Buddhist temples in Bangkok, which we just visited last week.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZonexandScout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zonexandscout/32/544_2.png) [@ZonexandScout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZonexandScout)\
**Post date:** [January 2, 2023, 5:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187/127 "2023-01-02T05:09:07Z")

</div>

Yes, the rules were that knees had to be covered. The robes provided would cover most women’s knees, but they did not even cover my shorts (i.e., my shorts were longer than the robe they made me wear over them).

Perhaps I should change this to a charge of discrimination against males by not providing robes of an adequate length for a typical male?

Sadly, I did not get to keep the robe after the tour finished.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-examples-of-misogyny/977187.md?page=6)
