# Stupid liberal idea of the day

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [April 20, 2011, 3:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086 "2011-04-20T15:35:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 239

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 9:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4761 "2016-06-16T09:56:52Z")

</div>

Flying isn’t a right. Owning a gun is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 10:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4762 "2016-06-16T10:24:13Z")

</div>

It’s still a punishment, Mr Mover of Goalposts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 10:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4763 "2016-06-16T10:26:04Z")

</div>

Well, we’re going to use the list now to take away voting rights, since apparently this is now allowed. You don’t support suspected terrorists voting, do you?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 10:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4764 "2016-06-16T10:35:03Z")

</div>

Come to think of it, they should also be denied ACA subsidies and/or Medicaid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![asahi](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/asahi/32/8693_2.png) [@asahi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/asahi)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 10:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4765 "2016-06-16T10:48:33Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> I didn’t say that. I said that using the rhetoric of a moral crusade to pass a small, incremental bill, is just playing politics. All I said is that the gun control debate is nothing more than a politics debate, it is not designed to change things all that much. Just make them a little better on the margins.
> 
> I’m not absolutist on guns. As long as law abiding people have access to a gun I’m cool. If you want to limit number of guns or magazine sizes or ban AR-15s, that’s cool with me. I just don’t expect it to accomplish much.

I’m in agreement that wholesale change is what is required to have a true impact, but with our system of checks and balances, incremental is often the best we can do. The alternative is to do nothing, which is unacceptable. Ultimately, the most practical aim for gun rights is to come up with a few incremental changes that can provide bang for the buck.

What’s particularly frustrating about the gun lobby isn’t that they are asserting the right to keep and bear arms – I would expect them to exercise their right of speech to protect that right. But it’s the notion that any proposal is an attempt to repeal gun rights.

In the long run, their stubbornness is going to cost them. Different generations have different attitudes about guns, and with increased urbanization, I suspect that future generations will have less room for NRA propaganda in the wake of senseless tragedies. The gun rights lobbyists risk skipping opportunities for mutually-agreed up changes that accommodate both parties and dealing with the consequences of future legislation based on emotional outrage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 11:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4766 "2016-06-16T11:09:25Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Come to think of it, they should also be denied ACA subsidies and/or Medicaid.

Those have nothing to do with public safety. Guns and airplanes do.

Not that I necessarily support the no fly list, but that’s the justification, not punishment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 11:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4767 "2016-06-16T11:10:12Z")

</div>

> [@asahi](#):
>
> In the long run, their stubbornness is going to cost them. Different generations have different attitudes about guns, and with increased urbanization, I suspect that future generations will have less room for NRA propaganda in the wake of senseless tragedies. The gun rights lobbyists risk skipping opportunities for mutually-agreed up changes that accommodate both parties and dealing with the consequences of future legislation based on emotional outrage.

Through refusal of responsibility ([a recent development btw](http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/7-uncovered-quotes-show-how-far-rails-nra-has-gone)), they have already gone far to establishing themselves as the enemy who must be opposed. Continuing recalcitrance, and ideological insistence that their own reading of the Second is absolute and all else must give way to it, could cost them \*everything \*they claim to be a natural right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 12:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4768 "2016-06-16T12:13:57Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Those have nothing to do with public safety. Guns and airplanes do.
> 
> Not that I necessarily support the no fly list, but that’s the justification, not punishment.

Fine. Bank accounts and travel of suspected terrorists should be closely monitored then. Library records too. Internet tracking and wiretaps can’t hurt either.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fear\_Itself](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fear_itself/32/19637_2.png) [@Fear\_Itself](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fear_Itself)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 12:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4769 "2016-06-16T12:51:17Z")

</div>

Gretchen Carlson calls for [reinstating the assault weapons ban.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FnQdAxmePVw) That makes her a stupid liberal. Right?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Anconia](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@D\_Anconia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Anconia)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4770 "2016-06-16T14:26:36Z")

</div>

Race activist disrupts vigil for Orlando victims.

“I was really nervous to get up here because there’s a lot of white people in the crowd, and that wasn’t a joke".

What a genius.

> **[Disgusting: Mizzou Race Activist Scolds White People At Orlando Shooting Vigil](https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/06/15/disgusting-mizzou-race-activist-scolds-white-people-at-orlando-shooting-vigil-n2178917)**
>
> Oh, c'mon -- really?!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4771 "2016-06-16T15:02:13Z")

</div>

> [@D\_Anconia](#):
>
> Race activist disrupts vigil for Orlando victims.
> 
> “I was really nervous to get up here because there’s a lot of white people in the crowd, and that wasn’t a joke".
> 
> What a genius.
> 
> [http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/06/15/disgusting-mizzou-race-activist-scolds-white-people-at-orlando-shooting-vigil-n2178917](http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2016/06/15/disgusting-mizzou-race-activist-scolds-white-people-at-orlando-shooting-vigil-n2178917)

I was all set to agree with this but…

“Disrupts”? She was standing on stage addressing the crowd. Not only did you cite a sneering, dismissive piece, you just had to skew it further. So while it’s entirely possible that woman is a flake, you’ve managed to obscure her idiocy with your own.

[Here’s a more objective article](http://www.columbiamissourian.com/news/local/columbia-remembers-victims-of-orlando-shooting-at-candlelight-vigil/article_e906539e-31d2-11e6-a3e4-93c50cd87f63.html). She still comes across as a flake, but without all the OMG RACE ACTIVIST bullshit.

Weak sauce.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 3:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4772 "2016-06-16T15:07:35Z")

</div>

> [@adaher](#):
>
> Fine. Bank accounts and travel of suspected terrorists should be closely monitored then. Library records too. Internet tracking and wiretaps can’t hurt either.

Don’t even allow them to open bank accounts, or to use libraries. Wiretap their phones, put trojans on their computers to send every keystroke to the NSA. Don’t allow them to fly, or drive a car. Or use public transport. \*\*\*But whatever you do, you mustn’t take away their God-given right to carry a GUN.

* * *

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4773 "2016-06-16T15:16:44Z")

</div>

“Race Activist”. Now there’s a term that’s just screaming out for an acronym. Like S.J.W., or L.S.M., or Hussein.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gyrate](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gyrate/32/3588_2.png) [@Gyrate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gyrate)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 3:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4774 "2016-06-16T15:26:40Z")

</div>

> [@septimus](#):
>
> Don’t even allow them to open bank accounts, or to use libraries. Wiretap their phones, put trojans on their computers to send every keystroke to the NSA. Don’t allow them to fly, or drive a car. Or use public transport. \*\*\*But whatever you do, you mustn’t take away their God-given right to carry a GUN.
> 
> * * *

Exactly. I’m not a fan of the “No-Fly List” (its members can be added far too arbitrarily) but _if_ the government feels that the people on this list are so dangerous we can’t trust them with an economy-class plane ticket and a spork to eat their chicken-in-red-sauce with, \*then \*I don’t understand why it’s perfectly fine to them to walk into Walmart and buy a gun. Either they’re dangerous or they’re not.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4775 "2016-06-16T15:38:59Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Exactly. I’m not a fan of the “No-Fly List” (its members can be added far too arbitrarily) but _if_ the government feels that the people on this list are so dangerous we can’t trust them with an economy-class plane ticket and a spork to eat their chicken-in-red-sauce with, \*then \*I don’t understand why it’s perfectly fine to them to walk into Walmart and buy a gun. Either they’re dangerous or they’re not.

I imagine the problem of denying someone buying a gun becomes a due process issue due to the 2nd amendment. If the no-fly list required a hearing or trial that would resolve that issue. I think.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 4:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4776 "2016-06-16T16:06:25Z")

</div>

The no-fly list should be subject to challenge by the person in question. But, of course. Seems to be that if someone comes forward to challenge their classification, their value as a covert operative is severely diminished. And, of course, those not guilty of anything or erroneously included simply must have some legal recourse. _Très_ duh, _mais non?_

But the point of the exercise is not validating such things as a “no-fly” list, but as a challenge. If the NRA won’t permit even such persons as are identified as being some sort of risk from purchasing weapons… well, who, then?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4777 "2016-06-16T16:35:01Z")

</div>

The obvious solution to the list of potentially dangerous persons is appeal. The list is secret, yes, perhaps justifiably so perhaps not so very much, but then you try to do a proscribed thing and its content becomes ever so slightly less secret: you find out that you are on it.

So once you find that datum out, and the kitten is out of the bag, why should that settle the question? One of your sacred/natural rights is being summarily or arbitrarily being withheld, and you have no recourse?

In a truly free and fair society, there _would_ be a route to appeal. In fact, I should think that an advocate for the NSA or DHS should be required to stand before a judge and/or jury and bear the burden of proof that this particular right genuinely ought to be denied to you.

Which does not fix the spying problem, but we have to start _somewhere_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 4:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4778 "2016-06-16T16:42:51Z")

</div>

By the way, I am not allowed to fly. Not because I am suspicious or apparently potentially dangerous, but my state has not met the ID standard, and I failed to obtain the enhanced version (missed the deadline that day).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![andros](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e480ec/32.png) [@andros](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/andros)\
**Post date:** [June 16, 2016, 6:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4779 "2016-06-16T18:34:06Z")

</div>

> [@Gyrate](#):
>
> Exactly. I’m not a fan of the “No-Fly List” (its members can be added far too arbitrarily) but _if_ the government feels that the people on this list are so dangerous we can’t trust them with an economy-class plane ticket and a spork to eat their chicken-in-red-sauce with, \*then \*I don’t understand why it’s perfectly fine to them to walk into Walmart and buy a gun. Either they’re dangerous or they’re not.

El Rushbo this morning says it’s because of the Obama administration coddling Muslim extremists.

Nothing to do with NRA-backed Republican opposition to tightening background check legislation, naturally. Nope, it’s entirely Barack Hussein Obama being too huggy with the evil Mooslims who want us all dead.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\
**Post date:** [June 17, 2016, 3:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086/4780 "2016-06-17T03:26:42Z")

</div>

CBS News thinks it’s a travesty that their law abiding correspondent was able to buy a gun after passing a background check:

> **[CBS News producer shows how easy it is to buy an assault rifle](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/orlando-massacre-buying-ar-15-gun-easy-in-many-states/)**
>
> It took 38 minutes and $1,030 for her to walk out of Va. store with ammunition and a gun like the one used in the Orlando nightclub massacre

And then liberals wonder why conservatives accuse them of wanting to take away our guns.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086.md?page=238)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-liberal-idea-of-the-day/579086.md?page=240)
