# Stupid Republican idea of the day **URL:** \ **Category:** The BBQ Pit\ **Created:** [March 26, 2009, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897 "2009-03-26T18:48:35Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 20\ **Page:** 1127
**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 12:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22522 "2015-06-27T00:34:21Z")
No, he’s just a shameless panderer. He doesn’t actually believe any of this nonsense; he just knows he can make a buck and derive some power and influence from it. ---
**Author:** ![adaher](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/dec6dc/32.png) [@adaher](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/adaher)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 12:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22523 "2015-06-27T00:50:17Z")
One thing that is sure to piss me off is going after the Supreme Court in such a way that you are actually proposing constitutional remedies. The Supreme Court itself is a constitutional remedy and our primary bulwark against overreaching government. ---
**Author:** ![Leaper](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4bbf92/32.png) [@Leaper](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leaper)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 12:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22524 "2015-06-27T00:53:02Z")
> [@Bridget\_Burke](#): > > Really? 9/11? December 7th? Several assassinations? Various natural disasters? This is the worst? He’s an attorney who’s dealt with the Supremes. Now he’s forgotten just how the Constitution works. Oh, but that’s just earthly lives. We’re talking about ETERNAL SOULS BURNING IN HELLFIRE. That’s serious business! ---
**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22525 "2015-06-27T01:42:33Z")
> [@Leaper](#): > > Oh, but that’s just earthly lives. We’re talking about ETERNAL SOULS BURNING IN HELLFIRE. That’s serious business! I’m often cold, so I’m rather looking forward to some toasty warmth. ---
**Author:** ![Mr.Greenjeans](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mr.greenjeans/32/551_2.png) [@Mr.Greenjeans](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Greenjeans)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 2:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22526 "2015-06-27T02:19:53Z")
I love it that they just can’t take “Yes” for an answer. ---
**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 2:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22527 "2015-06-27T02:32:05Z")
> [@Boyo\_Jim](#): > > I see Travesty growing up to eventual gender identification as male, becoming Travis, and then having a reality show. Nah, she’ll grow up to be a porn star. The name of her first movie? _Fucking Travesty._ ---
**Author:** ![Uncle\_Jocko](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/uncle_jocko/32/2932_2.png) [@Uncle\_Jocko](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Uncle_Jocko)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 2:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22528 "2015-06-27T02:52:05Z")
> [@E-DUB](#): > > Ted Cruz wants to be able to vote out supreme court justices. I just saw the headline so I don’t know if he meant just him and just the ones he doesn’t like. Funny he should mention that. After the 2009 Iowa Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage in our state (Hiya, rest of the country! Glad you could join us!), the knucklehead conservatives led by Bob VanderPlaaaaaaaats and his Family Leader group whipped the state into a frenzy about judicial overreach and “making laws from the bench.” Yes, we’ve heard all this before. Anyway, in Iowa, judges do stand for re-election. VanderPutz and his gang got enough outrage going to defeat the three Supremes on the ballot in 2010. Interestingly enough, in elections since then, the “traditional marriage” group hasn’t been able to muster nearly as much umbrage. No Supreme Court justices have been voted off the bench since then. So, Ted … the tide is against you at the ballot box, too. It would be nice if Texas voters would have the gumption to vote off sniveling panderers like Cruz (and I say that knowing voters in my state keep re-electing Steve King and sent Hog Castratin’ Joni Ernst to the Senate, so …) ---
**Author:** ![Evil\_Captor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/f17d59/32.png) [@Evil\_Captor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Evil_Captor)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 3:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22529 "2015-06-27T03:04:10Z")
Today is a day for celebratory drinking: [Scalia’s Tears](http://twitchy.com/2015/06/26/tweeters-compete-for-the-best-scalias-tears-cocktail-recipe/). People say they are delicious! ---
**Author:** ![rsa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/839c29/32.png) [@rsa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/rsa)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 3:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22530 "2015-06-27T03:20:25Z")
> [@E-DUB](#): > > Ted Cruz wants to be able to vote out supreme court justices. I just saw the headline so I don’t know if he meant just him and just the ones he doesn’t like. That’s nothing, Bobby Jindal says we should [abolish the supreme court](http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/jindal-wants-to-get-rid-of-supreme-court-after-gay-marriage-ruling/) and save some money. ---
**Author:** ![running\_coach](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/running_coach/32/15836_2.png) [@running\_coach](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/running_coach)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 3:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22531 "2015-06-27T03:28:30Z")
> [@rsa](#): > > That’s nothing, Bobby Jindal says we should [abolish the supreme court](http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/jindal-wants-to-get-rid-of-supreme-court-after-gay-marriage-ruling/) and save some money. Have any of these morons ever taken a civics class? ---
**Author:** ![Truman\_Burbank](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/ecc23a/32.png) [@Truman\_Burbank](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Truman_Burbank)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 3:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22532 "2015-06-27T03:43:48Z")
> [@running\_coach](#): > > Have any of these morons ever taken a civics class? Taken? Possibly.\* Passed\*? ---
**Author:** ![Rick\_Kitchen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rick_kitchen/32/522_2.png) [@Rick\_Kitchen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick_Kitchen)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 5:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22533 "2015-06-27T05:22:36Z")
[Marcus Bachmann has filed for divorce from Michelle.](http://nationalreport.net/marcus-bachmann-files-divorce-fresh-heels-scotus-ruling/) ---
**Author:** ![Wolf333](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolf333/32/3460_2.png) [@Wolf333](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wolf333)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 5:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22534 "2015-06-27T05:25:53Z")
> [@Rick\_Kitchen](#): > > [Marcus Bachmann has filed for divorce from Michelle.](http://nationalreport.net/marcus-bachmann-files-divorce-fresh-heels-scotus-ruling/) That’s a fake news site. ---
**Author:** ![Rick\_Kitchen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/rick_kitchen/32/522_2.png) [@Rick\_Kitchen](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rick_Kitchen)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 5:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22535 "2015-06-27T05:34:25Z")
Dammit. ---
**Author:** ![Lacunae\_Matata](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/8491ac/32.png) [@Lacunae\_Matata](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lacunae_Matata)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 6:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22536 "2015-06-27T06:08:03Z")
Besides, isn’t this thread for stupid Republican ideas? Because that, if true, would have been pretty much the smartest thing that Marcus has ever done! 😃 ---
**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 6:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22537 "2015-06-27T06:10:11Z")
> [@rsa](#): > > That’s nothing, Bobby Jindal says we should [abolish the supreme court](http://dailycaller.com/2015/06/26/jindal-wants-to-get-rid-of-supreme-court-after-gay-marriage-ruling/) and save some money. I don’t want to abolish the Court altogether, but given the present court composition, some wasted money could be saved by putting eight of the justices on furlough and letting Anthony Kennedy make all the decisions unilaterally; his vote is already on the winning side in almost every single case, no? It is an instructive but cheerless fact that almost every SCOTUS decision these days is 5-4 with the same actors on each side: humanists versus bloated-amygdala corporate whores. The main exceptions are when Roberts, seeing that the Republiopaths are going to lose 5-4 anyway, makes it 6-3 so that his grandchildren think he’s less of a despicable hack. Of course in the case of the Obamacare suit, the wise Republiopaths wanted the rational side to win. A finding against Obamacare would have caused so much disruption that even moronic voters would have finally woken up to the malice of Republiopathology. ---
**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 6:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22538 "2015-06-27T06:41:08Z")
There you go, dismissing and disparaging your ideological opposition. That sort of thing comes in for a lot of stern criticism around here. No, really. ---
**Author:** ![foolsguinea](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/foolsguinea/32/14751_2.png) [@foolsguinea](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/foolsguinea)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 7:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22539 "2015-06-27T07:18:21Z")
> [@septimus](#): > > I don’t want to abolish the Court altogether, but given the present court composition, some wasted money could be saved by putting eight of the justices on furlough and letting Anthony Kennedy make all the decisions unilaterally; his vote is already on the winning side in almost every single case, no? > > It is an instructive but cheerless fact that almost every SCOTUS decision these days is 5-4 with the same actors on each side: humanists versus bloated-amygdala corporate whores. The main exceptions are when Roberts, seeing that the Republiopaths are going to lose 5-4 anyway, makes it 6-3 so that his grandchildren think he’s less of a despicable hack. > > Of course in the case of the Obamacare suit, the wise Republiopaths wanted the rational side to win. A finding against Obamacare would have caused so much disruption that even moronic voters would have finally woken up to the malice of Republiopathology. Actually, there are lots of cases that aren’t about those particular ideological differences, and don’t split quite that way. ---
**Author:** ![Little\_Pig](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/c57346/32.png) [@Little\_Pig](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Pig)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 7:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22540 "2015-06-27T07:30:26Z")
> [@Wolf333](#): > > That’s a fake news site. Damn! And I bought that story hook, line and sinker. ---
**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\ **Post date:** [June 27, 2015, 8:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897/22541 "2015-06-27T08:54:41Z")
> [@foolsguinea](#): > > Actually, there are lots of cases that aren’t about those particular ideological differences, and don’t split quite that way. Cite? Obviously some decisions are 7-2, etc. but on the close votes the correlations are rather consistent and strong. Some years ago at SDMB, I posted a statistical summary of all 5-4 votes over a period of a decade or so, demonstrating the correlations. Do you have new statistics showing the opposite, or was yours just a fanciful post? > [@Correlation of SCOTUS votes.](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/correlation-of-scotus-votes/558036/22): > > It may be wise, as you suggest, to restrict attention to 5-4 decisions, since that is when the vote “counts.” I did my own study, and found that Scalia and Thomas were on the same side in 102 out of 113 five-four decisions, more than any other pair. > > From Wikipedia, I reconstructed a database of 580 Supreme Court decisions for the years 2001-2009. Of these, 113 decisions were made by a 5-4 vote. I confined my analysis to those 113 cases. > > I found that the 4 “liberals” (Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer and either Souter or Sotomayor) voted the same way on 83 of the cases, split 3-1 on 18 of the cases, and split 2-2 on 12 of the cases. > > Of the 83 five-four decisions where “liberals” were united, they lost 52 and won the remainder with the help of Kennedy (18), O’Connor (10), Scalia (2), Thomas (1). > > Of the 18 five-four decisions where “liberals” were split 3-1, they lost 11 despite help from O’Connor (5), Kennedy (2), Scalia (2), Thomas (1), Rehnquist (1), and won 7. > > By the way, when groups of 2 judges are considered instead of groups of 4, no pair of “liberals” outperformed Scalia and Thomas for correlation: this pair were on the same side in 102 out of the 113 five-four decisions. > > Here are the detailed votes in the 113 five-four decisions: > The 12 vote columns correspond to > > 1. Rehnquist > 2. Roberts > 3. Stevens > 4. O’Connor > 5. Scalia > 6. Kennedy > 7. Souter > 8. Thomas > 9. Ginsburg > 10. Breyer > 11. Alito > 12. Soto > > ```auto > > Case Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko" : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Dusenbery v. United States (page does no : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co. v : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Kelly v. South Carolina (page does not e : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. ( : YxYNYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB" : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Mickens v. Taylor (page does not exist)" : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Thompson v. Western States Medical Cente : NxNYYYYYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett (page does n : YxYYNYNNNYxx 5 4 9 > Case Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc. (page : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Federal Maritime Comm'n v. South Carolin : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case McKune v. Lile (page does not exist)">Mc : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Carey v. Saffold (page does not exist)"> : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. Moran">Rush : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Harris v. United States (page does not e : YxNYYYNNNYxx 5 4 9 > Case Zelman v. Simmons-Harris">Zelman v. Simm : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Republican Party of Minnesota v. White"> : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Board of Ed. of Independent School Dist. : YxNNYYNYNYxx 5 4 9 > Case Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (page does not : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case United States v. White Mountain Apache T : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Ewing v. California">Ewing v. California : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Lockyer v. Andrade">Lockyer v. Andrade Case Brown v. Legal Foundation of Washington : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Virginia v. Black">Virginia v. Black : YxYYYNNNNYxx 5 4 9 > Case Roell v. Withrow (page does not exist)"> : YxNYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Nguyen v. United States (page does not e : NxYYNYYYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case American Insurance Association v. Garame : YxNYNYYNNYxx 5 4 9 > Case Green Tree Financial Corp. v. Bazzle (pa : NxNNYNYNYYxx 4 5 9 > Case Georgia v. Ashcroft">Georgia v. Ashcroft : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Stogner v. California">Stogner v. Califo : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Jama v. Immigration & Customs Enforc : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Smith v. Massachusetts (page does not ex : NxYYYNYYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Roper v. Simmons">Roper v. Simmons Case Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Johnson v. United States (page does not : YxNYNNYYNYxx 5 4 9 > Case Pasquantino v. United States (page does : YxYYNYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Pace v. DiGuglielmo (page does not exist : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Granholm v. Heald">Granholm v. Heald : NxNNYYYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Medellin v. Dretke" class="mw-redirect"> : YxNNYYNYYNxx 5 4 9 > Case Dodd v. United States (page does not exi : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Rompilla v. Beard (page does not exist)" : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Kelo v. City of New London">Kelo v. City : NxYNNYYNYYxx 5 4 9 > Case Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Servs. ( : YxNNYYYYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Van Orden v. Perry">Van Orden v. Perry Case Bell v. Thompson (page does not exist)"> : YxNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case McCreary County v. ACLU" class="mw-redir : NxYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > ----- > Case Brown v. Sanders (page does not exist)"> : xYNYYYNYNNxx 5 4 9 > Case Central Virginia Community College v. Ka : xNYYNNYNYYxx 5 4 9 > ----- > Case Day v. McDonough">Day v. McDonough Case Garcetti v. Ceballos">Garcetti v. Ceball : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Hudson v. Michigan">Hudson v. Michigan Case Empire HealthChoice Assurance, Inc. v. M : xYYxYNNYYNNx 5 4 9 > Case Rapanos v. United States">Rapanos v. Uni : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case United States v. Gonzalez-Lopez">United : xNYxYNYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Kansas v. Marsh">Kansas v. Marsh : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Ayers v. Belmontes (page does not exist) : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Lawrence v. Florida (page does not exist : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Philip Morris USA v. Williams">Philip Mo : xYNxNYYNNYYx 5 4 9 > Case Marrama v. Citizens Bank of Massachusett : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Massachusetts v. EPA" class="mw-redirect : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Zuni Public School District No 89 v. Dep : xNYxNYNNYYYx 5 4 9 > Case Gonzales v. Carhart">Gonzales v. Carhart : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case James v. United States (2007)">James v. : xYNxNYYNNYYx 5 4 9 > Case Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman (page does not : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Brewer v. Quarterman (page does not exis : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Smith v. Texas (2007)">Smith v. Texas Case Schriro v. Landrigan (page does not exis : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Uttecht v. Brown">Uttecht v. Brown Case Bowles v. Russell">Bowles v. Russell : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Morse v. Frederick">Morse v. Frederick Case Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defen : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Parents Involved in Community Schools v. : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Panetti v. Quarterman">Panetti v. Quarte : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons">Ali v. : xYNxYNNYYNYx 5 4 9 > Case United States v. Santos (page does not e : xNYxYNYYYNNx 5 4 9 > Case Irizarry v. United States (page does not : xYYxYNNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Boumediene v. Bush">Boumediene v. Bush Case Dada v. Mukasey">Dada v. Mukasey : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Sprint Communications Co. v. APCC Servic : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Kennedy v. Louisiana">Kennedy v. Louisia : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case District of Columbia v. Heller">District : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Medellin v. Texas : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Coun : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Altria Group, Inc. v. Good" class="mw-re : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Herring v. United States">Herring v. Uni : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Oregon v. Ice">Oregon v. Ice, 55 : xNYxNYNNYYYx 5 4 9 > Case Summers v. Earth Island Institute (page : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Bartlett v. Strickland">Bartlett v. Stri : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Vaden v. Discover Bank (page does not ex : xNNxYYYYYNNx 5 4 9 > Case Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc. (page : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett (page does no : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Corley v. United States (page does not e : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Arizona v. Gant">Arizona v. Gant : xNYxYNYYYNNx 5 4 9 > Case FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc." cl : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Ashcroft v. Iqbal">Ashcroft v. Iqbal : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Haywood v. Drown">Haywood v. Drown Case Montejo v. Louisiana">Montejo v. Louisia : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co." class : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case United States v. Denedo (page does not e : xNYxNYYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case District Attorney's Office for Third Jud : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. (p : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts">Melendez : xNYxYNYYYNNx 5 4 9 > Case Atlantic Sounding Co. v. Townsend">Atlan : xNYxNNYYYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Horne v. Flores">Horne v. Flores : xYNxYYNYNNYx 5 4 9 > Case Cuomo v. Clearing House Assn., L. L. C." : xNYxYNYNYYNx 5 4 9 > Case Ricci v. DeStefano">Ricci v. DeStefano ---------- > Case Hollingsworth v. Perry : xYNxYYxYNNYN 5 4 9 > Case Wellons v. Hall" class="mw-redirect">Wel : xNYxNYxNYYNY 5 4 9 > Case South Carolina v. North Carolina (page d : xNYxYYxNNYYN 5 4 9 > > ``` [Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897.md?page=1126) [Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/stupid-republican-idea-of-the-day/490897.md?page=1128)