# Sub-species vs race

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [January 2, 2003, 5:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229 "2003-01-02T17:49:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![monstro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ba9def/32.png) [@monstro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/monstro)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2003, 8:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229/21 "2003-01-03T20:02:28Z")

</div>

The concept of what makes a species is still under debate among systematists. If what makes a species isn’t set in stone, I imagine the same goes for subspecies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tamerlane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tamerlane/32/7602_2.png) [@Tamerlane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tamerlane)\
**Post date:** [January 3, 2003, 8:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229/22 "2003-01-03T20:09:14Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> If what makes a species isn’t set in stone, I imagine the same goes for subspecies.

It’s actually worse ;). At least there are strong competeing philosophical definitions of what a species is.

- Tamerlane

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hrdygrdymn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/77aa72/32.png) [@Hrdygrdymn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hrdygrdymn)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2003, 12:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229/23 "2003-01-04T00:59:40Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by tomndebb \*  
> \*\*  
> Linnaeus, himself, borrowed the older word “race” to identify sub-categories of humans in his efforts to produce a comprehensive taxonomy of the natural world. He published his description of four “races” in 1758, over 100 years before th U.S. Civil War.  
> \*\*

I didn’t mean to suggest that the whole idea of race was new to the Civil War era. Indeed Linnaeus’ taxonomy as fault-ridden as it was on the matter, did recognize physical features particular to certain broad races.

Clearly this is not quite what we mean today when we refer to race. But try to define race. Is it skin color? country of origin? socio-historical experience? If what we mean by race is any of these, then let’s call it that. Not only are there no cut and dried genetic indicators of subspecies from one race to another, the term lacks a real purposeful definition… largely because it describes that which does not exist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Stafford\_Cripps](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_stafford_cripps/32/7167_2.png) [@The\_Stafford\_Cripps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Stafford_Cripps)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2003, 4:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229/24 "2003-01-04T16:13:18Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by cowgirl \*  
> \*\*I hope it isn’t too much of a hijack to start talking about squirrels at this point …
> 
> IIRC, in England they had little-ish red squirrels. Big gray squirrels somehow came over from Europe and now there aren’t a whole lot of little-ish red ones any more, just medium sized reddish/gray ones and big gray ones. Were the original red ones and gray ones only subspecies, even though they looked so different?  
> \*\*

I’m afraid there are a few misconceptions here. The native species of squirrel in Europe, including the British Isles, is the Red Squirrel. These are timid animals, not often seen in the wild as they prefer to hide. In the 19th century people imported Grey Squirrels into Britain from north America, as these are less timid and good for decorating private and public parkland. Reds and greys are different species; they cannot or do not interbreed. Greys are gradually taking over from reds as they adapt more effectively to available food supplies. I’ve heard that once greys are seen in an area the reds will have died out in 20 years because they cannot compete for food.

Reds can still be seen in the Scottish Highlands and islands off the coast of England where there are no greys.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Stafford\_Cripps](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/the_stafford_cripps/32/7167_2.png) [@The\_Stafford\_Cripps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Stafford_Cripps)\
**Post date:** [January 4, 2003, 4:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229/25 "2003-01-04T16:30:27Z")

</div>

Shit, sorry Tamerlane, I didn’t notice your heading  
_ **Grey and Red squirrels in Great Britain** _.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/sub-species-vs-race/146229.md?page=1)
