Trivia.
In the space between the runout groove and label, there would sometimes be a hand etched message. Once you’ve seen it, it becomes obvious whenever you look at the record.
Trivia.
In the space between the runout groove and label, there would sometimes be a hand etched message. Once you’ve seen it, it becomes obvious whenever you look at the record.
Yup.
And much later, Direct to Metal (DMM). No acetate involved.
I had this! Lost it many years ago and IIRC it was one of the floppy records that came with the magazine, although I can’t remember which number it was.
The tonearm return mechanism is definitely triggered by the position of the tonearm - if it takes a couple of revolutions to kick in then that’s just down to the delay caused by the operation of the cams and cogs in the gubbins. Nice record decks will let the needle loop in the playout groove forever unless someone intervenes as any auto-return mechanism would degrade the audio by introducing parts whose sympathetic vibrations would be picked up by the needle.
Here’s something I noticed as a small child, but took me decades to work out what was going on: Often I could very faintly hear the start of a track a second or two before it came out of the speakers at the proper volume. As a child I decided it was some sort of delay between the needle and the speaker, but then when I learned a bit more about electronics I realised that couldn’t explain it as the delays were way too long for the types of circuits involved, but couldn’t think of what could actually be happening. Then one day it hit me - I was hearing exactly one revolution’s worth of delay (1.8 s for 33 1/3 rpm, etc.), so one groove must be leaving a very faint trace in the side wall of the next groove along, probably due to the stamped-molten-vinyl manufacturing process. Possibly these faint traces are formed as the molten plastic cools (still a hypothesis - haven’t proven that one yet).
Yes! I remember noticing this too on some records I had as a child in the early 1960s. The specific record(s) that I can recall were 45s.
No idea, but from here:
Automatic turntables rely on the position or angular velocity of the arm, as it reaches the wider spacing in the groove, to trigger a mechanism that lifts the arm off the record. Precisely because of this mechanism, most automatic turntables are incapable of playing any audio in the lock groove, since they will lift the arm before it reaches that groove.
And, now that I reread that, I see it says position or angular velocity, so how close it is to the center would trip it as well (or, probably not ‘trip it as well’ but rather ‘trip it on some record players’). However, I can see inherent problems with that. Namely, there would have to be a standard for where it trips, meaning a standard for the size of the label (so you don’t run the stylus up onto the label). All records, or at least all record companies might not like that. Being able to squeeze a few more minutes onto a record by using a smaller label might be nice to have in some circumstances.
And to show my (young) age of only 40 years old, or make everyone else feel old, did the smaller records (45’s?) have the same size label, I really don’t remember?
I’ve heard of print through with magnetic tape but not on a vinyl record before. Weird.
When I first heard it I though it might have been due to the cutter deforming the just laid down groove slightly as it cut the next one. However, even if this did happen I would expect that high frequencies would be significantly attenuated. I think the general feeling is that the phenomenon is actually print through from the tape. Timing it carefully would probably be definitive. Tape reel rotation and LP speeds are not all that dissimilar, so it is easy to be confused about which is the cause. I’m almost tempted to break out the turntable. Almost. It is in the cellar, and probably needs a new drive belt. The preamp is also not quite serviceable. I don’t have quite the nostalgia quotient needed to do this.
That doesn’t make sense to me. The runout groove is a continuous loop, and is usually perfectly circular. In a normal record, when the tone arm hits that groove, it no longer moves at all.
I guess it could be based on speed but the other way, in that it detects if the tone arm has stopped moving. But then I’ve read that some records which wanted the record to continue forever would have to make the runout groove larger, being further from the center, in order to avoid the auto stop mechanism.
I’m also pretty sure I’ve seen some people on YouTube show off an auto stop and/or auto return record player, and just manually move the arm inward to make it shut off.
May I ask where a link to the source for your statement?
It could be tape print-through, poor pressing, poor vinyl or record grooves too close together.
https://forums.stevehoffman.tv/threads/vinyl-pre-track-ghosting-question.87677/
https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/vinyl-quot-bleed-through-quot-need-set-up-advice
The real test would be to find a direct-to-disc record that was mastered directly from the lacquer master and not from tape.
One of the things done for audiophile records in the 70’s and 80’s was to reduce the time on a record to increase the spacing between the grooves. So instead of 22 minutes per side, there may be only 15 minutes. This was an issue for direct-to-disc jazz records as the musicians typically improvise and may lose track of the recording time.
That had occurred to me. I have one in my collection that I know was so created. One thing that direct to disk recording did however was run a fixed groove spacing. Since they didn’t know what the amplitude of what was to come was they couldn’t adaptively space the grooves. They tended to cut pretty hot too, so would pick a wide spacing from the outset. I suspect the ability to perform adaptive groove spacing and thus push the limits of spacing might have been one of the aspects of cutting that could contribute to inter-groove bleed.
If I had the energy I might do the experiment. Not going to happen right now.
I’m sure the annals of the Audio Engineering Society contain a full coverage. I might have a search.
I once did a tour of the EMI record factory in London. We started at the huge hoppers full of plastic granules. To one side there was a workshop where they were mincing unsold LPs and the trimmings. We were told that this recycled plastic was only used for 45s.
We saw the etching process for ‘mothers’ and ‘masters’ and then the presses where the records were printed. The soft vinyl was extruded and a blob place by hand on a plate. The centre paper discs were added at this time before the press formed the record.
This was not a fast process and each record took several minutes from extrusion to trimming and passing on to Quality Control.
When it was passed (a random sample went through further tests in an anechoic chamber) it was put in a plain sleeve and on a shelf in the warehouse.
The printed covers were stored separately and stocks were kept to a minimum as they were more expensive to produce than the records and could not be recycled like the vinyl. Classical records were much more profitable than pop because they were much longer-lived.
In the offices, there were dozens of people whose job it was to phone the record stores and take the daily orders. Naturally, they would also be pushing whatever EMI wanted to promote at the time. These orders were dispatched overnight to the stores all over the country.
Their contract artists were expected to tour the factory to show themselves to the workers. The Beatles were apparently quite good about it - the Sex Pistols less so.
If we want to get technical…the groove that spins in a continuous loop is the “lock groove”, the spiral that goes from the end of the recording to the lock groove is the lead-out groove. It’s that spiral that moves the head, quickly, from the end of the recording to the continuous part that’s tripping the mechanism, if the mechanism is the type tripped by angular velocity of the tone arm.
Some of them behaved very badly so they discontinued the practice.
Cecil covered this in a column in one of the Straight Dope books. It had to do with how the master tape was stored, and that there was some bleed-through on the tape that made it onto the vinyl master. Sorry I don’t remember the specifics and couldn’t find the article.
It had to do with how the master tape was stored
This is why most professionals are taught to store tape “Tails Out” to prevent audible print-through.
I wonder if that’s where Page got the idea for Heartbreaker. Because I recall reading that it’s something they recreated in the studio.
Sorry for the hijack, but as long as you guys are talking about this, it seems like striking while the iron is hot, so to speak.
This was an issue for direct-to-disc jazz records as the musicians typically improvise and may lose track of the recording time.
Hence this little gem from The Good Place.
“Wrap it up, Elton John.”
This is why most professionals are taught to store tape “Tails Out” to prevent audible print-through.
??
The reason I heard for “tail out” was that it ensured even tension and no edges sticking up when the tape was stored after playing. You pull the tape out of the library, rewind it, then immediately play it so any uneveness from the rewinding is tempered with the playback, then put the reel back in storage again.