# Super Bowl LX

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/super-bowl-lx/1027508>\
**Category:** The Game Room\
**Created:** [February 8, 2026, 11:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/super-bowl-lx/1027508 "2026-02-08T23:12:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 214

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smithsb](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smithsb/32/12107_2.png) [@smithsb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smithsb)\
**Post date:** [February 9, 2026, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/super-bowl-lx/1027508/214 "2026-02-09T18:04:59Z")

</div>

> [@JRDelirious](#):
>
> three whole strategic bombers

Totally pedantic: B-1B bombers are not strategic. The Air Force considers “strategic” as nuclear capable or intended. The A model was strategic. There are extensive differences:  
From Wiki AI - The B-1A and B-1B are variants of the Rockwell Lancer bomber, with the B-1A designed for high-altitude supersonic flight (Mach 2.2+) and the B-1B optimized for low-altitude, radar-evading penetration at high subsonic speeds (Mach 1.25), featuring reduced radar signature and larger payload capacity, shifting from speed to stealth and payload for modern warfare. Key differences include the B-1A’s variable engine intakes and crew escape capsule versus the B-1B’s fixed intakes, standard ejection seats, and significantly lower radar cross-section, making the B-1B a more survivable conventional bomber.

Not said is that the ability to arm and launch nuclear bomb/missiles is missing from the B-1Bs. There’s more equipment required for that than you would think.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/super-bowl-lx/1027508)._
