# Superman causing World War III **URL:** \ **Category:** In My Humble Opinion\ **Created:** [October 26, 2014, 9:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555 "2014-10-26T09:52:26Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 8\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![Mr.Kobayashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4af34b/32.png) [@Mr.Kobayashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Kobayashi)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2014, 9:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/1 "2014-10-26T09:52:26Z")
A spin off of [this thread](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=738054). In it **Chronos** opined that [MAD - the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_assured_destruction) - does not deserve the credit for stopping World War III. So here’s the scenario to test it. I dunno if you’ve seen the godawful film _Superman IV_ (if you haven’t, don’t). The plot is Superman decides to [rid the world of nuclear weapons](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOLhQ6puoS4). All existing nuclear warheads from any nuclear power are flung into the sun, as are any new ones that have been built. The film was made in 1987, the tail end of the Cold War. With no MAD deterrence left, what are the chances that a conventional World War III occurs as a result of this universal nuclear disarmament? ---
**Author:** ![Mr.Kobayashi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/4af34b/32.png) [@Mr.Kobayashi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mr.Kobayashi)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2014, 10:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/2 "2014-10-26T10:02:15Z")
Should have linked to [the post](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?p=17839524#post17839524) with that opinion, my bad. Also meant to say that the world has no kryptonite at its disposal, so there is no way to stop any Kryptonians disposing of out nuclear weapons. ---
**Author:** ![Andy\_L](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c67d28/32.png) [@Andy\_L](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Andy_L)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2014, 1:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/3 "2014-10-26T13:06:01Z")
> [@Mr.Kobayashi](#): > > All existing nuclear warheads from any nuclear power are flung into the sun, as are any new ones that have been built. The film was made in 1987, the tail end of the Cold War. With no MAD deterrence left, what are the chances that a conventional World War III occurs as a result of this universal nuclear disarmament? As long as Superman is still around, he remains a deterrent against conventional war - I’d expect him to seriously impede a tank invasion of Western Europe for example. The real problem would be other WMDs like poison gas or biological weapons. ---
**Author:** ![Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/prof.pepperwinkle/32/13627_2.png) [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Prof.Pepperwinkle)\ **Post date:** [October 26, 2014, 2:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/4 "2014-10-26T14:10:41Z")
See _The Watchmen_: as long as Dr. Manhattan was around, no war against the U.S. was possible; same thing with Superman in the above scenario. ---
**Author:** ![Dale\_Sams](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/779978/32.png) [@Dale\_Sams](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dale_Sams)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2014, 12:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/5 "2014-10-27T00:30:58Z")
> [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](#): > > See _The Watchmen_: as long as Dr. Manhattan was around, no war against the U.S. was possible; same thing with Superman in the above scenario. The opposite happens (we assume) in “A Taste of Armageddon” once Kirk gets rid of their machines. ---
**Author:** ![Malacandra](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/45deac/32.png) [@Malacandra](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Malacandra)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2014, 7:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/6 "2014-10-27T07:09:09Z")
> [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](#): > > See _The Watchmen_: as long as Dr. Manhattan was around, no war against the U.S. was possible; same thing with Superman in the above scenario. Read _Watchmen_; one of the end-of-comic fillers was a magazine article in which the writer postulated that if the Soviets emptied their silos at the US all at once, Manhattan would not be able to stop more than about half, and if the US continued in its prideful arrogance on the assumption that the Soviets daren’t do anything about it, Armageddon was not far away. ---
**Author:** ![Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Skald\_the\_Rhymer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Skald_the_Rhymer)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2014, 6:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/7 "2014-10-27T18:58:50Z")
> [@Prof.Pepperwinkle](#): > > See _The Watchmen_: as long as Dr. Manhattan was around, no war against the U.S. was possible; same thing with Superman in the above scenario. Except it wasn’t true, even in Watchmen. In the comic, the US projected (and Manhattan seemed to agree) that in the event of a full-scale exchange of nukes, Manhattan would not be able to keep even half the Russian missiles (presumably coming from multiple directions) from hitting their targets. ET: I see the Martian beat me to this by 12 hours. ---
**Author:** ![Andy\_L](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c67d28/32.png) [@Andy\_L](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Andy_L)\ **Post date:** [October 27, 2014, 10:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/superman-causing-world-war-iii/702555/8 "2014-10-27T22:50:40Z")
> [@Malacandra](#): > > Read _Watchmen_; one of the end-of-comic fillers was a magazine article in which the writer postulated that if the Soviets emptied their silos at the US all at once, Manhattan would not be able to stop more than about half, and if the US continued in its prideful arrogance on the assumption that the Soviets daren’t do anything about it, Armageddon was not far away. Yeah, that’s more or less why I answered as I did above. To elaborate: the Superman of the Superman through Superman IV can’t stop a nuclear war - he has a hard enough time stopping two missiles in the first movie (it requires an extraordinary effort), and eliminating all the nuclear weapons in Superman IV is another indication that he thinks that he can’t stop an all out nuclear exchange. Superman can seriously impede (and thus can deter) a conventional war of just about any size though (massed tanks heading from Warsaw to Paris are not going to make it if Superman is around). Superman does need to worry about biological warfare and chemical warfare - and after eliminating nuclear weapons he ought to work on those. In the post-nuclear (and post-other WMD) world that Superman creates, nations do need to worry about massive conventional attack if Superman suddenly becomes unavailable, but the prospects for an immediate WWIII after Superman ends all WMDs are pretty slight.