Thanks for the link. I don’t think that says what you previously stated.
You suggest nits are being picked, but I suggest that correct terminology and facts are all the more important these days, as the specific legal authority creating various federal entities and programs is critical, not to mention who (exec/legis/judic) has authority to control/direct/eliminate such entities and programs. This is all taking place in the context of “WHAT IS LEGAL.” And the practice of law - if nothing else - depends on the careful and specific definition of terms.
Your link provides no discussion of what the person quoted meant by, people living with disabilities have seen wait times grow from two to eight months for approval of their benefits.. Is that time from initial application to initial review? From request for hearing to favorable decision? From favorable decision to first check? SOME clarification is important. Moreover, as someone who has worked w/ SS disability for nearly 4 decades, my clear impression is that wait times and pending applications have consistently decreased at all levels of review, and are at or near all time lows.
So I ask for any evidence that there has been any increase in wait times. AND, if there has been, that it was related to reductions of staff (by whatever means.)
Back in the 90s I believe, I was subject to a potential furlough. A furlough is a very specific action, requiring specific process. Perhaps some folk have been furloughed by Trump, but I’m not aware of which of his efforts reflect furloughs. To be clear, the proposed (and delayed) deferred resignations ARE NOT furloughs. (I presume you agree that it makes a difference whether someone quits or is fired? And ought such situations be described accurately?)
Speaking of deferred resignations, your link does not mention that the vast majority (if not all) public facing SSA employees have been ruled INELIGIBLE to participate in the deferred resignation. From an internal email:
On January 30, 2025, SSA received new guidance from OPM that exempted SSA front line service employees from the deferred resignation program, consistent with the exemption in the President’s hiring freeze Executive Order. Therefore, employees who work in the listed offices for the following components are not eligible: in the Office of Operations (DCO), field offices, teleservice centers, program service centers, workload support units, and the Office of Central Operations; in the Office of Hearings Operations (DCHO), hearings offices and National Service Delivery organization; in the Office of Analytics, Review and Oversight (DCARO), Office of Quality Review (OQR) field sites and the Office of Appellate Operations (OAO); and in the Office of the General Counsel (OGC), the Office of Program Litigation.
That is a HUGE portion of SAA staff, and AFAICT, just about EVERYONE involved in determining eligibility and keeping checks flowing, who are ineligible.
Today - for the first time - I saw in the paper that many VA employees were similarly ineligible. I’ve been disappointed that such intra-Agency classifications have not been reported previously. So the FORK YOU emails may have been sent to 2 million employees, but only a much smaller percentage of those 2 million are eligible to participate (IF it is upheld. Which I believe it should NOT be, as several aspects of it lack legal authority.)