# Swamp Thing from Muskogee! Rightard Pride Week!

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [August 9, 2004, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042 "2004-08-09T16:19:33Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mockingbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/c68b51/32.png) [@Mockingbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mockingbird)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/141 "2004-08-12T05:17:39Z")

</div>

> [@Starving Artist](#):
>
> I said that Coburn never said gays were worse than al-Qaeda. (Which is _not_ to say I’m taking up for him. Quite the contrary.) But people either say what they said or they don’t. This is a don’t. To say otherwise is the reader’s interpretation. **Miller** clearly believes this and that’s his right. I don’t, and that’s my right.
> 
> I said terrorists were a threat to our safety, not our freedoms.
> 
> I still say both.
> 
> I said–after hours of discussion in which the thread had come full circle and was back where it started–that I was therefore leaving. I said nothing about forever. I said nothing about (or to indicate) I was leaving in a rage, as anyone who wants to bother going back and reading the post can easily see for him/herself.

Wow. Honestly.

That is so stunningly bullshit like, I’d almost think Bill O’Reilly was saying it to cover one of his many mistakes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/142 "2004-08-12T05:22:34Z")

</div>

> [@Starving Artist](#):
>
> I said that Coburn never said gays were worse than al-Qaeda. (Which is _not_ to say I’m taking up for him. Quite the contrary.) But people either say what they said or they don’t. This is a don’t. To say otherwise is the reader’s interpretation. **Miller** clearly believes this and that’s his right. I don’t, and that’s my right.

Just curious, but is it your position that politicians never, ever use innuendo and doublespeak to advance positions they know would get them tarred and feathered if stated baldly? That seems… remarkably naive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nightime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Nightime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nightime)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/143 "2004-08-12T05:23:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I said terrorists were a threat to our safety, not our freedoms.

So it is perfectly comprehensible that gays are a threat to our freedoms (how, again?)  
But it is “utterly ridiculous” that terrorism is a threat to our freedoms.  
Patriot Act? Never heard of it. I think it’s one of those liberal myths. Terrorism is all fine and dandy when it comes to our freedoms.  
Gays on the other hand… well, just yesterday the Gay Agenda broke into my house when I wasn’t home, without the need for a warrant, to make sure I had performed the required number of abortions.

So how about it, **SA**. Are you going to leave the Republican party since Bush says that terrorism is a threat to our freedom?

At the very least you should admit that, given that Bush considers terrorism a threat to our freedoms, you were wrong when you said:  
"Okay, well, this is just about it for me. You’ve lost all perspective. "

“utterly ridiculous assertion”

“ridiculous bullshit”

“keep this silly kind of shit up and see what kind of credibility you have”

Unless of course, you are going to say all this to Bush.

Just as an aside, I hope you can deal with your overconfidence in, and then blind adherance to, your interpretations, because judging by your language here I am afraid that it will lead you to commit violence in real life.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/144 "2004-08-12T05:39:22Z")

</div>

> [@milroyj](#):
>
> A. He posted on a public message board, making it everyone’s business.

And what’shisgaybash said what he said to the public press, thereby making it even more everyone’s business.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/145 "2004-08-12T05:43:00Z")

</div>

**Nighttime** , in fairness to **SA** , he was calling my assertion that Coburn was comparing gays to terrorists “utterly ridiculous” etc, not the idea that terrorists are a threat to freedom. And while he could have been clearer at the beginning, he’s since made it clear that he does not agree with Coburn’s statements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Starving\_Artist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aeb1de/32.png) [@Starving\_Artist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Starving_Artist)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/146 "2004-08-12T05:52:04Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> You’ve said yourself that people are misreading what you’ve said alot, not just in this thread, and not just on this subject. Along with my own observations in this thread, that indicates to me that the problem is in the broadcast, not the reception.

Perhaps. But to what degree do you think the mere fact I’m a conservative poster on a vastly predominately liberal message board comes into play? As I said, I’ve seen exactly the same kind of misstatment and misinterpretation applied virtually without exception to any socially or politically oriented comment made by any of the other conservative posters around here. With the exception of the likes of **EddyTeddyFreddy** , **Zoe** , (and now _you_ 🙂 ), that is.

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Not at all. All you need to do is stop being so defensive when people misread your posts. If someone says, “Hey, what you just wrote is patronizing!” _don’t_ come back and say “No it isn’t.” Instead, stop saying whatever it is that people are objecting to. How hard is that? Try and find a different way of addressing the subject, and if you can’t find one, maybe consider that the attitude you’re trying to project may, in fact, _actually be patronizing_, even if you didn’t mean it to be that way.

This is very good advice on your part. I give you my word I’ll try it. But let me ask you, what if they don’t just say “Hey, **SA** , you’re being kind of a patronizing jerk here, ya know,” but instead they say something more like what I usually get, such as “Fuck you, asshole! You don’t know what you’re talking about.”? How am I to perceive that my adversary thinks that I’m being patronizing?

And this brings up another point. I’ve found to a large degree it’s a pretty good idea to give as good as you get when people start getting ugly with you. Otherwise, you just get run over. When I first came here I would try to proceed logically and politely even in the face of aggressively hostile and profane opposition. I pretty much got creamed. So then I adopted more of an attack stance, still showing respect to those who treated me the same, but becoming a major-league asshole and insult-monger to anyone who crossed me. This was pretty successful. I was surprised to find I had almost everyone running for cover, with some of my profane and insulting adversaries even going so far as to go into other threads and start complaining about how I was being mean to them…and they were part of a thread where I was outnumbered 12 to 15 to one.

But that proved ultimately unsatisfying as well. As I told EddyTeddyFreddy, I was beginning to feel like a right-wing bully and that I was coming off like Ted Nugent with a keyboard. I didn’t like the way I felt when I went to bed after one of these sessions. So I then adopted the posture I’ve used pretty much since, which is to try to be strong so as not to get run over, but not so strong that I act like a bully. I treat people respectfully and will even give them somewhat of a lead on acting ugly before I start to respond in kind.

This has worked pretty well in the main, but I think it may also have played a role in the difficulties we’ve all experienced regarding my posts to this thread. It has begun to appear to me that what you see as condescention and a stubborn refusal to see the problem is what I see as my being strong and attempting to stay on point in the face of hostile opposition. Strength is a good thing, but not if it only makes things worse. You can chalk this one up to another learning experience for me, and I thank _you_ for taking the time and putting out the effort to convey your thoughts on the problem in such a way that _I_ was able to see the situation in a different light myself.

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Yeah, you hit the nail on the head there. That’s what’s known as “empathy,” and it’s a vital part of being able to communicate clearly. Empathy is a skill, it’s something anyone can learn how to do, and I think it’s something that you really need to practice. I can understand how, from your perspective, the things you’re saying aren’t at all offensive. What you need to learn how to do is to understand how, from _our_ perspective, they are indeed offensive.

As I just said above, I will indeed try. But I have to say that to a great degree it will depend on the type of things that are being said to me at the time. If my opponent will try to show me how they feel about what I’m saying and where there’s a disconnect, I will indeed work to empathize. But if it’s a just a case of angry insults and gross misrepresentations of what I’ve said, then it will be less successful because I tend to give what I get. I don’t say this out of pride or arrogance, that’s just truly the way it is. I’m like that in real-life (for want of a better term) too. If people talk loudly to me, I talk loudly back. If people scowl and get angry with me, I scowl and talk angrily back, etc. So to a very real degree, it is the people I come into contact with here who determine what the nature of our relationship will be.

> [@Miller](#):
>
> Actually, my interactions with you in this thread have done a lot to raise you in my esteem. Prior to this thread, I’d written you off as another reactionary troglodyte like **milroyj**. Nothing I’d seen from you previously (although I admit I hadn’t been paying a whole hell of a lot of attention to you before) gave me any indication that you had the goodwill and open mindedness you’ve been (somewhat ineffectually) displaying here. Hell, if it weren’t for the fact that you were friends with the inestimable **EddyTeddyFreddy** , I probably would’ve written you off two pages back, like **Mockingbird** evidently has. In short, thanks to this thread, I think I’ve for the first time gotten an idea of the sort of person you actually are, which is diametrically opposed to the sort of person you’ve “shown” yourself to be. You seem like a genuinely good guy to me, but I think you’re wildly over-estimating how well you come across on the boards.

Thanks. This thread has proven one of my other theories (I have many :p), and that is that even when things aren’t going the way you want them to, things still usually work out for the best. I, too, had given you short shrift prior to our interaction here. But you’ve turned out not to be such a bad guy yourself. And **ETF** and I have found we can weather a pretty ugly disagreement and still remain friends. And hopefully, I’ve gained a new insight that will help me to interact here more effectively.

All in all, a pretty good result. Thanks again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nightime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Nightime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nightime)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 5:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/147 "2004-08-12T05:59:18Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Nighttime, in fairness to SA, he was calling my assertion that Coburn was comparing gays to terrorists “utterly ridiculous” etc, not the idea that terrorists are a threat to freedom.

“al-Qaeda is a threat to our safety, not our freedoms.” - SA

I would guess that the vast majority of people, on hearing the phrase “the greatest threat to our freedom that we face today”, would consider terrorists among those threats. And rightly so.

I’m not saying for certain that Coburn is among that vast majority.

But what I am saying is that it isn’t ridiculous to believe that Coburn, like Bush and most Republicans, believes terrorism is a threat to freedom.  
**SA** ’s view is highly atypical of Republicans, and ignores, most obviously, things like the Patriot Act.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SolGrundy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/bbce88/32.png) [@SolGrundy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SolGrundy)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/148 "2004-08-12T06:03:17Z")

</div>

> [@Starving Artist](#):
>
> I’ve found to a large degree it’s a pretty good idea to give as good as you get when people start getting ugly with you. Otherwise, you just get run over.

And that sums up my side of this “debate” pretty succinctly.

Still wish it hadn’t devolved into “liberals” vs “conservatives” (vs, apparently “The Taliban and Saudi Arabia” 😕 ) so quickly, but eh, what are you going to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nightime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Nightime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nightime)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/149 "2004-08-12T06:07:44Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I’ve found to a large degree it’s a pretty good idea to give as good as you get when people start getting ugly with you. Otherwise, you just get run over.

Does anyone remember **SA** ’s advice earlier in this thread?  
Where he told gays to do the exact opposite of what he now says is the best idea?  
And remember the response?  
When people told him that if they did that, they would just get run over?

Looks like he really agreed all along.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matt\_mcl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/7ab992/32.png) [@matt\_mcl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/matt_mcl)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/150 "2004-08-12T06:23:22Z")

</div>

That only applies to him, you see, not to gay people.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Starving\_Artist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aeb1de/32.png) [@Starving\_Artist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Starving_Artist)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/151 "2004-08-12T06:24:13Z")

</div>

Hey, **Nightime** , you know what I think would be a good idea? I think it would be a good idea to tailor one’s behavior to the situation. If I were trying to effect social and political change, I would probably not adopt the same type of behavior as I would in defending myself one-on-one on a message board.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Starving\_Artist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aeb1de/32.png) [@Starving\_Artist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Starving_Artist)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/152 "2004-08-12T06:27:43Z")

</div>

> [@Miller](#):
>
> **Nighttime** , in fairness to **SA** , he was calling my assertion that Coburn was comparing gays to terrorists “utterly ridiculous” etc, not the idea that terrorists are a threat to freedom. And while he could have been clearer at the beginning, he’s since made it clear that he does not agree with Coburn’s statements.

Thank you, **Miller**. I appreciate it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nightime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Nightime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nightime)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/153 "2004-08-12T06:45:06Z")

</div>

The people who you attacked for being too angry were also posting on a message board.

I suspect they too would act differently offline, trying to effect social change.  
However, I also think that nobody in this thread really went overboard, given the outrageous nature of Coburn’s remarks. The Pit is the right place to let off steam, and even then it was pretty tame by Pit standards.  
I would have thought that if the co-chair of the presidential advisory council on HIV and AIDS said gays are the biggest threat to our freedom, he would get trashed even more.

Not to mention the bizarre things about gays being responsible for abortions. That one has to win the weirdness prize.

In the end, I agree with you that it is better to be less hostile in offline life than in the SDMB pit, but I think you assumed wrongly that anyone else thought otherwise.

I also think gays and those who support their rights DO need to be very vocal, and attack people like Coburn, or they will indeed be run over.

I mean really… you remember the part where he claims gays are the greatest threat to freedom, right? Even if he doesn’t include terror as a threat to freedom (which most Republicans, including Bush, do) that’s still utterly insane.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Miller](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/miller/32/481_2.png) [@Miller](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Miller)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/154 "2004-08-12T06:52:46Z")

</div>

> [@Starving Artist](#):
>
> Perhaps. But to what degree do you think the mere fact I’m a conservative poster on a vastly predominately liberal message board comes into play? As I said, I’ve seen exactly the same kind of misstatment and misinterpretation applied virtually without exception to any socially or politically oriented comment made by any of the other conservative posters around here. With the exception of the likes of **EddyTeddyFreddy** , **Zoe** , (and now _you_ 🙂 ), that is.

To some degree, I agree, it is a factor. In political threads, absolutely. In _this_ thread, not so much. Just speaking for myself, I make a deliberate effort not to cast the gay rights debate as a liberal v. conservative debate. It shouldn’t be: there’s nothing inherent in the conservative viewpoint that is incompatible with gay rights, despite what the religious extremists in the Republican party would have us believe.

> [@](#):
>
> This is very good advice on your part. I give you my word I’ll try it. But let me ask you, what if they don’t just say “Hey, **SA** , you’re being kind of a patronizing jerk here, ya know,” but instead they say something more like what I usually get, such as “Fuck you, asshole! You don’t know what you’re talking about.”? How am I to perceive that my adversary thinks that I’m being patronizing?

I think generally the assumption there is that you’re being _deliberatly_ patronizing. That was my first impression, at least. Generally someone whose posts are as well written as yours has a better awareness of their tone. (Hey, how’s that for a backhanded compliment? Sorry 'bout that.)

> [@](#):
>
> And this brings up another point. I’ve found to a large degree it’s a pretty good idea to give as good as you get when people start getting ugly with you. Otherwise, you just get run over. When I first came here I would try to proceed logically and politely even in the face of aggressively hostile and profane opposition. I pretty much got creamed. So then I adopted more of an attack stance, still showing respect to those who treated me the same, but becoming a major-league asshole and insult-monger to anyone who crossed me. This was pretty successful. I was surprised to find I had almost everyone running for cover, with some of my profane and insulting adversaries even going so far as to go into other threads and start complaining about how I was being mean to them…and they were part of a thread where I was outnumbered 12 to 15 to one.

I think this is most likely the period where I got my impression of you as a poster.

> [@](#):
>
> But that proved ultimately unsatisfying as well. As I told EddyTeddyFreddy, I was beginning to feel like a right-wing bully and that I was coming off like Ted Nugent with a keyboard. I didn’t like the way I felt when I went to bed after one of these sessions. So I then adopted the posture I’ve used pretty much since, which is to try to be strong so as not to get run over, but not so strong that I act like a bully. I treat people respectfully and will even give them somewhat of a lead on acting ugly before I start to respond in kind.

That’s an excellent approach. And, as others have pointed out, it’s exactly what this thread was about before you showed up.

> [@](#):
>
> This has worked pretty well in the main, but I think it may also have played a role in the difficulties we’ve all experienced regarding my posts to this thread. It has begun to appear to me that what you see as condescention and a stubborn refusal to see the problem is what I see as my being strong and attempting to stay on point in the face of hostile opposition. Strength is a good thing, but not if it only makes things worse. You can chalk this one up to another learning experience for me, and I thank _you_ for taking the time and putting out the effort to convey your thoughts on the problem in such a way that _I_ was able to see the situation in a different light myself.

I can see how that could have happened, and I’m glad I’ve helped you out. Thank you for caring enough to listen.

> [@](#):
>
> As I just said above, I will indeed try. But I have to say that to a great degree it will depend on the type of things that are being said to me at the time. If my opponent will try to show me how they feel about what I’m saying and where there’s a disconnect, I will indeed work to empathize. But if it’s a just a case of angry insults and gross misrepresentations of what I’ve said, then it will be less successful because I tend to give what I get. I don’t say this out of pride or arrogance, that’s just truly the way it is. I’m like that in real-life (for want of a better term) too. If people talk loudly to me, I talk loudly back. If people scowl and get angry with me, I scowl and talk angrily back, etc. So to a very real degree, it is the people I come into contact with here who determine what the nature of our relationship will be.

One last piece of advice. Like you said above, for a while on the boards you were coming on pretty strongly and felt like you were being a bully. Some people are going to remember this, and react accordingly. I did, at first. You might want to keep that in mind if you get an immedate negative reaction. Not that I’m saying to be a push-over, of course, just maybe cut people a little extra slack if they start off hostile with you.

> [@](#):
>
> Thanks. This thread has proven one of my other theories (I have many :p), and that is that even when things aren’t going the way you want them to, things still usually work out for the best. I, too, had given you short shrift prior to our interaction here. But you’ve turned out not to be such a bad guy yourself. And **ETF** and I have found we can weather a pretty ugly disagreement and still remain friends. And hopefully, I’ve gained a new insight that will help me to interact here more effectively.
> 
> All in all, a pretty good result. Thanks again.

You’re welcome. It’s been educational for me, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nightime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Nightime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nightime)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/155 "2004-08-12T06:55:30Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Thank you, Miller. I appreciate it.

At least one thing we have in common, **SA** , is that we both get misconstrued.  
I don’t recall ever suggesting that you agreed with Coburn’s statements. In fact, I know that you don’t.  
I suggested that it was not ridiculous to consider that Coburn probably considers terrorism a threat to freedom, as do Bush and most Republicans. Not certain, but not ridiculous.  
Incidentally, have you reconsidered your statement that terrorism is no threat to our freedoms? Given things like the Patriot Act?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zoe](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/a4c791/32.png) [@Zoe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zoe)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 7:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/156 "2004-08-12T07:26:04Z")

</div>

Also, dead people lose most of their freedoms.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nightime](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Nightime](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nightime)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 7:27am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/157 "2004-08-12T07:27:58Z")

</div>

They still have the right to remain silent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Starving\_Artist](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/aeb1de/32.png) [@Starving\_Artist](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Starving_Artist)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 8:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/158 "2004-08-12T08:24:19Z")

</div>

> [@Nightime](#):
>
> At least one thing we have in common, **SA** , is that we both get misconstrued.

🙂

> [@Nightime](#):
>
> I don’t recall ever suggesting that you agreed with Coburn’s statements. In fact, I know that you don’t.

Thank you.

> [@Nightime](#):
>
> I suggested that it was not ridiculous to consider that Coburn probably considers terrorism a threat to freedom, as do Bush and most Republicans. Not certain, but not ridiculous.

Was this the argument? I thought, as **Miller** reiterated not too long ago, the comment about riduculosity (:D) was as to whether or not Coburn’s contention was that gays were “worse than al-Qaeda!” Without intending in any way to defend Coburn, I simply contended that this was not what Coburn said. I would take the same tack with Hitler. If someone posted a quote by Hitler and someone else was so outraged by it, as **Miller** was by Coburn’s statement, that they repeated it in such a way that the quote was exaggerated (sorry, **Miller** ) I would contest that as well. I guess I’m just a strict constructionist.

> [@Nightime](#):
>
> Incidentally, have you reconsidered your statement that terrorism is no threat to our freedoms? Given things like the Patriot Act?

Well, I’m sorry…but I don’t remember ever saying that terrorism was no threat to our freedoms. But I do remember saying that terrorism was a threat to our safety, not our freedoms…so I guess you can reasonably interpret it as though I said terrorism was no threat if you want. With regard to the Patriot Act, I think we’re caught up in context. When I said terrorism wasn’t a threat to our freedoms but rather a threat to our safety, I had in mind our basic freedoms that Americans have always enjoyed…you know, like freedom of speech, freedom of religion and so forth. Forgive me if I’m wrong, but you seem to view them as a threat to our freedoms due to the constraints and actions being taken under the Patriot Act. In this sense, I’d say we’re both right.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 12:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/159 "2004-08-12T12:24:53Z")

</div>

Wow! Now it IS time.

Quick, everyone, join hands before **milroyj** shows up again.

:: Loud, enthusiastic, slightly off-key ::

“Kumbaya, my Lord, kumbaya!..”

:: Big grin, catch in voice “”

You guys are the _ **BESTEST** _ friends ever!

😃😉😛🙂🆒

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Excalibre](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/898d66/32.png) [@Excalibre](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Excalibre)\
**Post date:** [August 12, 2004, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042/160 "2004-08-12T18:24:26Z")

</div>

> [@Starving Artist](#):
>
> You know (yes, I know I said I was leaving. Just cleaning up a few loose ends, or in this loose screws), I’d really like to see a show of hands…okay, posts…as to who here really and truly believes this. So come on, speak up. No long dissertations, no qualilfications or hedging, just a simple answer: Does anyone other than this idiot think I would deny rights to gays?

(Still only part-way through the thread, and as I’m at work, I don’t have time to read the rest first.)

Despite your little ‘friend to the queers everywhere’ speeches that you’ve been making throughout this thread, you’ve also been defending a dude who may be appointed to a position of significant power and who is preaching hatred for queerkind.

You are rather outspoken about your politics, and you vote for the guy who was recently behind a push to _amend the law of the land_ to discriminate against us. (So much for Bush having better things to do than to mess with us, huh?) Now you’re asking us to be quiet, and not make waves _even on an internet message board_. Mockingbird and Grundy here haven’t been yelling slogans outside the guy’s house - they’re venting in an anonymous forum. And you fault 'em for it. Apparently you expect us to sit back, and instead of showing “bile and hatred” (which I haven’t seen much of in this thread so far) we should just wade in the water?

So yeah, SA, not only do I think you would if given the opportunity, I think you’ve shown yourself already to be tirelessly working to do deny us our rights. Congrats, you disingenuous, sanctimonious prick.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042.md?page=7)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/swamp-thing-from-muskogee-rightard-pride-week/259042.md?page=9)
