# Taunting... Does taunter deserve what comes to them?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [May 20, 2013, 4:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835 "2013-05-20T16:32:30Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 17\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 2:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/21 "2013-05-22T02:13:42Z")

</div>

> [@Measure\_for\_Measure](#):
>
> I think you are in a minority and furthermore normal people don’t respond to taunts they receive with violence. I put aside legal issues for a second as per your request, but now they’re back again: I believe the law should be enforced.

What about Buzz Aldrin? This is an extraordinary man who possesses the high intelligence necessary to get his doctorate in astronautics and the self-control to remain cool in the face of stress and danger as both a fighter pilot and an astronaut. And yet after being taunted for about a minute and a half and called a liar, a thief and a coward Buzz slugged the guy.

I believe the law should be enforced as well. But if I were the prosecutor and I saw that this guy had no prior history of violence and his “victim” was egging him on I’m likely to plea bargain him down to some misdemeanor charge.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guinastasia](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guinastasia/32/5751_2.png) [@Guinastasia](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guinastasia)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 6:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/22 "2013-05-22T06:06:39Z")

</div>

I’m not touching you. I’m not touching you. I’m not touching you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 6:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/23 "2013-05-22T06:53:21Z")

</div>

I’m reluctant to draw conclusions based on a single anecdote. I see from wikipedia that in the case of Buzz Aldrin, we not merely talking about a minute and a half of nuisance, but rather a more elaborate trick by the perp: On September 9, 2002, Aldrin was lured to a Beverly Hills hotel on the pretext of being interviewed for a Japanese children’s television show. When he arrived, Apollo Conspiracy proponent Bart Sibrel accosted him with a film crew and demanded he swear on a Bible that the Moon landings were not faked. After a brief confrontation Aldrin punched Sibrel in the jaw. The police determined that Aldrin was provoked and no charges were filed. [Buzz Aldrin - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzz_Aldrin)

BBC: Mr Aldrin responded by punching Mr Sibrel, but said he merely struck out to defend himself and his stepdaughter, who was with him at the time.

Beverly Hills police investigated the incident, which occurred 9 September, but said that the charges were dropped after witnesses came forward to say that Mr Sibrel had aggressively poked Mr Aldrin with the Bible before he was punched.

…Mr Sibrel sustained no visible injury and did not seek medical attention… Poking with an object is considered assault in some jurisdictions AFAIK, though I doubt whether it is battery.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 9:17am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/24 "2013-05-22T09:17:01Z")

</div>

> [@Cheshire\_Human](#):
>
> Any time you do something stupid, with an easily predictable result, yes, you deserve that result if it befalls you. If I throw gas on a fire, it’s easily predictable that I could wind up burning to death. If so, I deserve it.

No; you’re mixing up morality with how we mortals have to accept the universe works.

Let’s say someone’s just a born idiot and they spend their whole life doing dumb things. You’re saying the right punishment for their “crime” of being an idiot includes (but is not limited to) some of the worst pain a human can experience, disfiguration and/or death?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrFidelius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/drfidelius/32/3447_2.png) [@DrFidelius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrFidelius)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 11:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/25 "2013-05-22T11:13:07Z")

</div>

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> No; you’re mixing up morality with how we mortals have to accept the universe works.
> 
> Let’s say someone’s just a born idiot and they spend their whole life doing dumb things. You’re saying the right punishment for their “crime” of being an idiot includes (but is not limited to) some of the worst pain a human can experience, disfiguration and/or death?

Well, yes. The price of stupidity is and always has been death. Either the stupid person learns or they die. (At this time in history, we have many more opportunities to learn from the deaths of earlier stupid people.)

Gilligan should have been fed to the sharks for what he put the rest of the castaways through.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Saint\_Cad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/saint_cad/32/18907_2.png) [@Saint\_Cad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Saint_Cad)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 1:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/26 "2013-05-22T13:08:31Z")

</div>

> [@Measure\_for\_Measure](#):
>
> I think you are in a minority and furthermore normal people don’t respond to taunts they receive with violence. I put aside legal issues for a second as per your request, but now they’re back again: I believe the law should be enforced.

That’s because of the law. If the law didn’t exist, what would the normal reaction be?  
What if the law instead read that after “sufficient” taunting the victim was allowed to defend himself in a manner to stop the harrassment similar to physical threats. That means that if I ask you to stop and you don’t, I move away from you and you follow and clearly the taunts are ongoing to get a **physical** reaction such as an increased heart rate and breathing and stress, I’m allowed to deck you to get you to stop.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 2:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/27 "2013-05-22T14:47:29Z")

</div>

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> You’re saying the right punishment for their “crime” of being an idiot includes (but is not limited to) some of the worst pain a human can experience, disfiguration and/or death?

I wasn’t talking about ‘punishment’. I was talking about predictable effects of your actions. No ‘morality’ involved. The OP didn’t specify anything about ‘punishment’.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 5:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/28 "2013-05-22T17:50:10Z")

</div>

> [@Measure\_for\_Measure](#):
>
> I’m reluctant to draw conclusions based on a single anecdote. I see from wikipedia that in the case of Buzz Aldrin, we not merely talking about a minute and a half of nuisance, but rather a more elaborate trick by the perp:

You should be reluctant to draw conclusions based on a single anecdote. However you said that no “normal” person responds to taunts with violence. Well here’s one case where someone who I think we can all agree is an extraordinary person did respond to taunting with violence. Was it an unusual situation? Yeah. But then for most of us I think being taunted is an unusual experience.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e47c2d/32.png) [@Biffy\_the\_Elephant\_Shrew](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Biffy_the_Elephant_Shrew)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 6:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/29 "2013-05-22T18:16:38Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Second\_Stone](#):
>
> My advice is not to taunt tigers named Tatiana.

Very good! Can you say “Titus the tailor told ten tall tales to Titania the titmouse”?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![simster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/simster/32/1047_2.png) [@simster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/simster)\
**Post date:** [May 22, 2013, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/30 "2013-05-22T19:40:57Z")

</div>

> [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](#):
>
> Just don’t.

/thread

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2013, 4:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/31 "2013-05-23T04:07:07Z")

</div>

> [@Cheshire\_Human](#):
>
> I wasn’t talking about ‘punishment’. I was talking about predictable effects of your actions. No ‘morality’ involved. The OP didn’t specify anything about ‘punishment’.

What you said was “Any time you do something stupid, with an easily predictable result, yes, _you deserve that result_” [emphasis added].

Deserve is an “ought to happen” word. If I say that someone “got what they deserved” it implies I think it is right and proper what happened to them, and I would not change things even if I could. It is making a moral statement.

Now, I will say here, this is one of those situations where you didn’t have many choices of word to use, but you may want to have another run at it if you didn’t mean this implication.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Claverhouse](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/13edae/32.png) [@Claverhouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Claverhouse)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2013, 4:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/32 "2013-05-23T04:21:42Z")

</div>

No-one ‘deserves’ anything; it is an unhelpful and meaningless claim.  
If some people are eaten by bears, though, I won’t mourn.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![theR](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/977dab/32.png) [@theR](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/theR)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2013, 4:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/33 "2013-05-23T16:19:35Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> You should be reluctant to draw conclusions based on a single anecdote. However you said that no “normal” person responds to taunts with violence. Well here’s one case where someone who I think we can all agree is an extraordinary person did respond to taunting with violence. Was it an unusual situation? Yeah. But then for most of us I think being taunted is an unusual experience.

To point out normal people may respond to taunts with violence, you emphasize that Buzz Aldrin is an extraordinary person. See what you did there?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cheshire\_Human](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/5f8ce5/32.png) [@Cheshire\_Human](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cheshire_Human)\
**Post date:** [May 23, 2013, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/34 "2013-05-23T18:27:01Z")

</div>

> [@Mijin](#):
>
> Deserve is an “ought to happen” word. If I say that someone “got what they deserved” it implies I think it is right and proper what happened to them, and I would not change things even if I could. It is making a moral statement.

Then we have a different understanding of the word ‘deserve’, and there’s no point in continuing. I said what I meant, and it had nothing to do with what ‘ought to happen’, but rather, merely that the person getting an easily predictable result has some share in the responsibility for that result occurring.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2013, 1:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/35 "2013-05-24T01:42:49Z")

</div>

> [@theR](#):
>
> To point out normal people may respond to taunts with violence, you emphasize that Buzz Aldrin is an extraordinary person. See what you did there?

I do. I pointed out that even someone with remarkable self-control can be taunted to the point of violence. If an extraordinary person can be taunted to violence it would indicate to me that even a “normal” person could find him or herself in a similar situation to Buzz.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mijin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mijin/32/9369_2.png) [@Mijin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mijin)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2013, 2:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/36 "2013-05-24T02:04:22Z")

</div>

> [@Cheshire\_Human](#):
>
> Then we have a different understanding of the word ‘deserve’, and there’s no point in continuing. I said what I meant, and it had nothing to do with what ‘ought to happen’, but rather, merely that the person getting an easily predictable result has some share in the responsibility for that result occurring.

Your new idea of “deserve” doesn’t match the dictionary definition. It’s not about responsibility, necessarily, nor what is easily predictable.  
If I said “He’s been so kind to so many people, he deserves to win the lottery” most people would accept that that sentence at least makes sense.

But the new statement you are making of course I have no issue with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [May 24, 2013, 8:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835/37 "2013-05-24T08:09:40Z")

</div>

> [@Saint\_Cad](#):
>
> That’s because of the law. If the law didn’t exist, what would the normal reaction be?

Oh, very different. Murder rates are very high in societies that lack the rule of law.

> [@](#):
>
> What if the law instead read that after “sufficient” taunting the victim was allowed to defend himself in a manner to stop the harrassment similar to physical threats. That means that if I ask you to stop and you don’t, I move away from you and you follow and clearly the taunts are ongoing to get a **physical** reaction such as an increased heart rate and breathing and stress, I’m allowed to deck you to get you to stop.

Providing additional scope for the exercise of violence doesn’t seem like a good reason to change the law. Like I said, harassment is itself illegal.

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> You should be reluctant to draw conclusions based on a single anecdote. However you said that no “normal” person responds to taunts with violence.

Er, I made a generalization, not a categorical statement. There’s a real difference between “Normal people don’t do X” and “Normal people _never_ do X”.

> [@](#):
>
> Well here’s one case where someone who I think we can all agree is an extraordinary person did respond to taunting with violence.

Aldrin claims he was defending his daughter. I maintain that the situation had a lot more going than “Taunting” – he was also being jerked around by being invited to a hotel for a sham children’s TV show. But again, without a detailed description of what exactly happened, I lack sufficient information to evaluate the quality of Aldrin’s judgment at that point in time. I don’t automatically assume that he did the right thing, regardless of how satisfying it is to imagine an Apollo conspiracy proponent getting clocked in the jaw (without serious injury- the man was not hospitalized).

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taunting-does-taunter-deserve-what-comes-to-them/658835.md?page=1)
