# Taxonomy of music. Can we make a "phylogenetic tree" of music?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Tags:** music\
**Created:** [August 14, 2023, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563 "2023-08-14T15:44:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2023, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/1 "2023-08-14T15:44:52Z")

</div>

I don’'t know how feasible this project is, but I think it’ll be interesting to try, and hopefully in the process educate myself on the history of music. Let’s try to make a taxonomic tree of music from the western tradition. The top level domain I want to consider in this thread is western music, because trying to include all music from every culture out there seems like too big a task, and lumping in traditional music from various unrelated societies into one big category would also be incorrect.

Let’s start at the kingdom level, and maybe get down to the phylum level as well. Should this project turn out to be feasibly, I think other threads for lower levels, especially once we get past the phylum level, might make sense. The two big ones are of course small c classical music and small p pop music. What other styles of music are different enough that they should have their own kingdom rather than being grouped under classical or pop? The first style that comes to mind is jazz. What other genres are different enough from classical and pop music that they should be at this level, meaning that they don’t fit into either the classical or pop category?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/qadgop_the_mercotan/32/83_2.png) [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qadgop_the_Mercotan)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2023, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/2 "2023-08-14T18:55:33Z")

</div>

Like this interactive music map? [https://musicmap.info/](https://musicmap.info/)

it begins before the 1880’s with ‘folk music’. zoom in for LOTS more detail.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr\_Paprika](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr_paprika/32/3042_2.png) [@Dr\_Paprika](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr_Paprika)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2023, 8:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/3 "2023-08-14T20:58:03Z")

</div>

I have seen a couple infographic books with a detailed tree-like map of all music genres as well. It would be easy to add titles like kingdom, etc. but I don’t think they did that. Once you get to modern techno variations, for example, the difference between subtypes is very modest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Banksiaman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/banksiaman/32/3334_2.png) [@Banksiaman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Banksiaman)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2023, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/4 "2023-08-14T21:26:02Z")

</div>

And lets not forget it was on the syllabus in ‘[School of Rock](https://www.globalnerdy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/school-of-rock-rock-family-tree.jpg)’.

[Further homework reading here](https://movies.stackexchange.com/questions/9353/who-wrote-the-school-of-rock-blackboard).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![superwombat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/superwombat/32/16616_2.png) [@superwombat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/superwombat)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2023, 9:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/5 "2023-08-14T21:40:29Z")

</div>

Ishkur’s Guide to Electronic Music has quite the in-depth tree, with audio samples and information

(Qadgop’s is cooler though)

[http://music.ishkur.com/](http://music.ishkur.com/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [August 14, 2023, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/6 "2023-08-14T21:44:50Z")

</div>

There’s a famous “Jazz Family Tree” poster (unfortunately, I can’t fine a zoomable version online):

> **[Highlights of the Jazz Story in USA: Poster : Amazon.de: Küche, Haushalt &amp;...](https://www.amazon.de/Highlights-Jazz-Story-USA-Poster/dp/3926855177)**
>
> Highlights of the Jazz Story in USA: Poster günstig auf Amazon.de: Kostenlose Lieferung an den Aufstellort sowie kostenlose Rückgabe für qualifizierte Artikel

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 11:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/7 "2023-08-15T11:04:53Z")

</div>

> [@FlikTheBlue](#):
>
> The top level domain I want to consider in this thread is western music, because trying to include all music from every culture out there seems like too big a task, and lumping in traditional music from various unrelated societies into one big category would also be incorrect.

But how are you going to account for non-Western inputs then? For instance:

> [@FlikTheBlue](#):
>
> the first style that comes to mind is jazz.

African music had a huge influence on Jazz and its precursors.

> [@FlikTheBlue](#):
>
> What other genres are different enough from classical and pop music that they should be at this level, meaning that they don’t fit into either the classical or pop category?

A different split, [as used by Wiki](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_genre#Major_music_genres), would be Art Music/Pop Music/Religious Music/Traditional & Folk Music

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 11:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/8 "2023-08-15T11:30:07Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](#):
>
> Like this interactive music map? [https://musicmap.info/](https://musicmap.info/)
> 
> it begins before the 1880’s with ‘folk music’. zoom in for LOTS more detail.

I’m going to need a rescue team with ropes, flashlights, and spelunking gear to extricate me out of this site.

mmm

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FlikTheBlue](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fliktheblue/32/10972_2.png) [@FlikTheBlue](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FlikTheBlue)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/9 "2023-08-15T12:48:43Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](#):
>
> Like this interactive music map?

Exactly! I’m going to need a bigger monitor to really get into all the details 😄.

ETA: Or new glasses. At first I thought the breakbeat category said breakfast. How can there have been a genre of breakfast music all these years that I’ve never heard of? That was my first thought 😅.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/10 "2023-08-15T14:26:46Z")

</div>

I’ve shown my cartography students this riff (so to speak) on the famous London tube (subway) map, where each tube line is a genre and each station a group or artist:

> **[underground5.pdf](https://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2006/02/02/underground5.pdf)**
>
> 685.20 KB

Just rock, pop, and related genres (and almost all English-speaking) since about 1955, though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![thorny\_locust](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/thorny_locust/32/431_2.png) [@thorny\_locust](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/thorny_locust)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 2:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/11 "2023-08-15T14:53:59Z")

</div>

> [@FlikTheBlue](#):
>
> The top level domain I want to consider in this thread is western music, because trying to include all music from every culture out there seems like too big a task

Very much not my field: but isn’t “western music” the result of having been influenced by just about every culture out there? How would ignoring that produce an accurate tree?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EinsteinsHund](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/einsteinshund/32/8400_2.png) [@EinsteinsHund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EinsteinsHund)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 7:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/12 "2023-08-15T19:32:18Z")

</div>

> [@Qadgop\_the\_Mercotan](#):
>
> Like this interactive music map? [https://musicmap.info/](https://musicmap.info/)

That’s a great site, thanks! I have a t-shirt with a similar, but rudimentary taxonomic chart of the history of rock. To match the map on the site I’d have to wear a circus tent. 😆

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/13 "2023-08-15T19:48:27Z")

</div>

> [@thorny\_locust](#):
>
> Very much not my field: but isn’t “western music” the result of having been influenced by just about every culture out there? How would ignoring that produce an accurate tree?

Being influenced by something does not make the music genetically non-Western. I can vaguely imagine a vastly extended tree where all the influences are taken into account; e.g. Romantic + Hungarian folk + Carnatic → ??

Even better, we should have the computer construct it for us. Maybe someone has already done it, though? Getting the data science/music informatics right is not trivial, though, especially if we want to avoid guiding the computer as to musical features or genres and have it figure that all out for itself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![motu](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/motu/32/259_2.png) [@motu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/motu)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 8:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/14 "2023-08-15T20:08:59Z")

</div>

[Music Genome Project](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_Genome_Project) used by Pandora Radio

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 8:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/15 "2023-08-15T20:39:46Z")

</div>

I suppose you could generate a directed graph where every genre, or every song even, is connected to its influences and what it influenced. But there’s no reason to expect that that graph would be planar, which would mean that it’d be a pain to put it on a piece of paper, or a static document on a screen.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [August 15, 2023, 9:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/taxonomy-of-music-can-we-make-a-phylogenetic-tree-of-music/988563/16 "2023-08-15T21:14:06Z")

</div>

> [@motu](#):
>
> [Music Genome Project](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Music_Genome_Project) used by Pandora Radio

That is kind of what I had in mind, except I wonder if the “genes”

> [@](#):
>
> Any given song is represented by approximately 450 “genes” (analogous to trait-determining genes for organisms in the field of genetics). Each gene corresponds to a characteristic of the music, for example, _gender of lead vocalist_, _prevalent use of groove_, _level of distortion on the electric guitar_, _type of background vocals_, etc. Rock and pop songs have 150 genes, rap songs have 350, and jazz songs have approximately 400. Other genres of music, such as world and classical music, have 300–450 genes. The system depends on a sufficient number of genes to render useful results. Each gene is assigned a number between 0 and 5, in half-integer increments.

can also be determined from the data. E.g., I do not recall the context but in one classification problem it turned out there was a difference between music in major keys and music in minor keys— that transpired naturally and was not fed in as a parameter in advance.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> I suppose you could generate a directed graph where every genre, or every song even, is connected to its influences and what it influenced. But there’s no reason to expect that that graph would be planar, which would mean that it’d be a pain to put it on a piece of paper, or a static document on a screen.

If the number of edges is several times the number of vertices then it starts to get messy. However, if we limit the number of immediate influences then the crossing number may not be too bad.
