# Teen flying around the world dead in crash

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/teen-flying-around-the-world-dead-in-crash/693934>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [July 24, 2014, 2:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/teen-flying-around-the-world-dead-in-crash/693934 "2014-07-24T14:02:24Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [July 24, 2014, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/teen-flying-around-the-world-dead-in-crash/693934/21 "2014-07-24T18:32:05Z")

</div>

> [@Johnny\_L.A](#):
>
> Where do you draw the line? Some people think it’s fun to run, so they enter the Susan G. Komen runs to raise money to fight breast cancer. It’s not expensive for them to do, but it’s fun. Is it wrong for them to do that? Or is it OK because the personal costs are low?

We’ll assume the charity isn’t a bad actor like Komen. But assuming that, it’s OK because the volunteer isn’t expecting any of her/his costs to be covered; all the money raised will go to the charity.

> [@](#):
>
> What about the foundation itself? Could it be seen as ‘Let’s do something that gives us a cushy job, and pretend it’s to fight breast cancer’?

It’s been a couple of decades since I first heard the phrase “start a nonprofit, draw a paycheck,” and there’s definitely some of that around. I really think there need to be some minimum standards for a charity, for contributions to it to be tax-deductible, like \>50% of contributed dollars going to mission-related activities, and \<50% going to salaries, overhead, fundraising, and the like. 50% is still not very good, but right now I don’t think there’s _any_ legal minimum.

But charities are required to fill Form 990 each year with the IRS, and people have websites where they’re all available, and they’re rated by how much is and isn’t going to the cause. Plus the salaries of the top officers are in the 990 too. So you can make your own call about the charity, with some context provided.

> [@](#):
>
> Is there any reason why something can’t be fun and expensive, and _also_ provide funds for charity? Should something that is fun and expensive not be used as a vehicle to raise awareness and funds, even though the activity will likely raise more money for the charity than might be raised by other means?

I think it all depends. If it means that a much smaller percentage of each donor’s dollar is going to mission-related activities, even if the total raised is slightly larger, I’d have a real problem with that as a donor. If a slightly smaller percentage would be going to mission, and the total raised was a **lot** larger, I’d have very little problem with it.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/teen-flying-around-the-world-dead-in-crash/693934.md?page=1)