# Tell me where (or if) I'm going wrong with 18 US Code 2071

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 10, 2023, 6:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295 "2023-06-10T18:04:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Falchion](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/a88e57/32.png) [@Falchion](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Falchion)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 1:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/41 "2023-06-12T13:04:11Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> I think that the reason why the 14th Amendment specifically calls out Senators and Representatives, but not the President, is because they anticipated the argument that Senators and Representatives were officers of their individual states, not of the United States. That argument does not apply to the President, so there was no need to call out the Presidency specifically.

I think that it is fairly clear that the US Congress (and its members) are a federal entity and not a creature of state law. But, even if that’s not right, it doesn’t solve the statutory interpretation problem: the 14th Amendment disqualification applies to individuals holding office under the United States _and_ “any State.” (As well as Senators, Representatives, and electors).

Of course, Senators and Representatives can’t be covered by the 14th Amendment’s reference to an “Office under the United States” because they are ineligible to hold such office per Article 1, Section 6 (“[N]o Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office.”). Which is why they need to be named specifically.

The President and Vice President are more interesting. I guess the question is whether an “office under the United States” is the same thing as being an “Officer of the United States.” I do not believe (and have explained previously) that the President is an “Officer of the United States,” as that term is used in the Constitution. But I don’t know whether I think that’s the same thing as holding an office under the United States.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/42 "2023-06-12T14:08:19Z")

</div>

This turned into a much longer and more interesting thread than I had anticipated. Just wanted to say thank you to all who have participated, for the information provided, and for the reasoned exchange of views. It could have easily gone sideways.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 2:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/43 "2023-06-12T14:08:40Z")

</div>

The senators at the time (IIRC) were in fact appointed by the state government to be the representatives of the state government, so the interpretation that they might be considered state offices wasnot illogical?

OTOH, as I recall the constitution does not allow for a person to resign but it can happen anyway. (Unable to fulfill duties vs. unwilling?) So there are circumstances not completely covered in detail by the constitution?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 2:41pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/44 "2023-06-12T14:41:10Z")

</div>

The Constitution expressly recognizes that Senators, the President and the Vice President may resign their offices (by listing “resignation” as one of the ways in which those offices may become vacant in describing how a vacancy is to be filled). The language for House members uses the phrase, “when vacancies happen” without expressly listing resignation. Nonetheless, Representative George Partridge was elected to serve in the first US Congress in 1789 and resigned prior to the conclusion of that Congress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Feldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lord_feldon/32/341_2.png) [@Lord\_Feldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Feldon)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/45 "2023-06-12T15:16:09Z")

</div>

Assuming that provision would include the presidency, I guess I don’t see it as an additional (and therefore unconstitutional) qualification to be president, but as a restriction on the rights of the convicted person. _Every_ criminal law takes away someone’s rights in a way that would otherwise be unconstitutional.

Like, why would these be different?

- Every 35 year old natural born citizen, etc., has a constitutional right to become president after election, but some criminal convictions take that away.
- Everyone has a constitutional right to keep and bear arms, but some criminal convictions take that away.

_U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton_ was a lawsuit by a guy (Ray Thornton) who was going to have his constitutional rights taken away by fiat, with no process at all.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/46 "2023-06-12T15:36:46Z")

</div>

Here’s another question: Suppose that a convicted felon does become president while in prison; is he unable to vote?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![md-2000](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9d8465/32.png) [@md-2000](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/md-2000)\
**Post date:** [June 12, 2023, 5:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295/47 "2023-06-12T17:10:20Z")

</div>

More important, can they limit his access to phone and visitors, and is a prison a SCIF for possessing classified documents? (Maybe store them in boxes on top of the toilet in the cell?)

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-me-where-or-if-im-going-wrong-with-18-us-code-2071/985295.md?page=2)
