If you ignore that there were no signs of forced entry, and Coleman was the victim’s brother in law. If you ignore that the victim was killed between 10-11 p.m., and Coleman was present and looking for sex in the trailer park at 10:20. If you ignore that the pants he was wearing on the night of the rape and murder had 10-12 inches of water on the bottom cuff and there was a creek behind the house that was 10-12 inches deep. If you ignore his prior rape conviction. If you ignore his constant lying on the stand. If you ignore the 11 different appeals/habeus/post conviction petitions that he had and lost.
If you ignore his confession to his cellmate in which he gave details of the murder that were known only to the murderer.
If you ignore the blood on his pants that he was wearing when the murder occured. If you ignore that the blood was the same type as the victim.
If you ignore the semen that was in the victim. If you ignore that this semen, when tested for his original trial, showed he was in the only 10% of those who possibly could be the perpetrators. If you ignore the DNA (PCR) testing later done on it that lowers that percentage to .2% of the population.
Then, yes, the evidence against him was based on two pubic hairs found on the victim that were inconsistent with her husband, but consistent with Roger Coleman.
Correct. It was .2%, with females excluded. However you ignore the possibility of something I heard about on this very board awhile ago. Woman Sperm. So, we’ll call it .1999999999999…%.