# Tell us an interesting random fact you stumbled across (Part 2)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [July 25, 2024, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785 "2024-07-25T15:06:02Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dropo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ce7236/32.png) [@Dropo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dropo)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2024, 6:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/201 "2024-08-16T18:54:41Z")

</div>

WARNING! DANGER! Banana peril!

> **[This Fungus Kills Bananas. B-A-N-A-N-A-S. But There's Hope](https://gizmodo.com/this-fungus-kills-bananas-b-a-n-a-n-a-s-but-theres-hope-2000487980)**
>
> The fungus ruining Cavendish banana crops is evolutionarily distinct from a similar disease that famously killed off the Gros Michel bananas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zyada](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zyada/32/3028_2.png) [@Zyada](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zyada)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2024, 7:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/202 "2024-08-16T19:01:10Z")

</div>

> [@Tibby](#):
>
> Indeed, John Travolta was just trying to catch worms in _Saturday Night Fever_.

He was more likely to catch crabs though

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Horatius](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/horatius/32/3572_2.png) [@Horatius](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Horatius)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2024, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/203 "2024-08-16T19:11:51Z")

</div>

> [@fachverwirrt](#):
>
> My wife had a gynecologist named Dr. Hyman.

I have a friend who claimed when he was in the militia (sort of like a Canadian National Guard), there was a Private Partz in his platoon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/elmer_j.fudd/32/1211_2.png) [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elmer_J.Fudd)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2024, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/204 "2024-08-16T19:15:24Z")

</div>

> [@Machine\_Elf](#):
>
> TIL about a thing called the Krukenberg procedure.

I have memories of such amputees when I was a kid and until now I wasn’t sure if they were accurate.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EinsteinsHund](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/einsteinshund/32/8400_2.png) [@EinsteinsHund](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EinsteinsHund)\
**Post date:** [August 16, 2024, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/205 "2024-08-16T19:42:28Z")

</div>

> [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](#):
>
> I have memories of such amputees when I was a kid and until now I wasn’t sure if they were accurate.

Me too. An acquainted family had a grandpa with such an arm. I suspect he had lost his hand in WWII, he was of the right age.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 12:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/206 "2024-08-17T00:56:00Z")

</div>

[Here is an interesting piece](https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/this-one-important-fact-about-current) that explains something most of us have been missing about Deep Learning Models.

I have written a traditional program or two, nothing worth mentioning, but I understand the process. One of the things a programmer learns to deal with are what are called “edge cases” and “corner cases”: conditions that fall outside the mainstream of what the program will be doing.  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This is where DLMs are weak: they do well handling situations that they have been trained on, but choke when taken outside their models. A self-driving car might plow right into an overturned semi trailer because it cannot determine what it is observing and has not been taught the general principle of _don’t run into large things if you don’t know what they are._  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; In other words, we have half the “AI” formula down, the ability to learn stuff and to use the stuff that has been learned. It is the creativity, the ability to extrapolate, adapt and deal with input that cannot be pulled from the existing models that is missing.  
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; So, in the end, what is being called “AI” is just some fancy-ass fuzzy-logic that works really well until it does not. If anyone tells you we are on the cusp, you can throw this back at them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 6:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/207 "2024-08-17T06:01:15Z")

</div>

To be fair to our future overlords, human intelligence is likewise susceptible to illogical failures in dealing with outliers. Human visual perception can fail in strange and unpredictable ways when presented with unusual or unfamiliar input, which is why optical illusions exist. People driving cars have collided with objects which should have been clearly visible but that the driver claims they didn’t see. High level cognition fails in dramatic ways, as shown by people who fervently believe in things with no evidence and are easily falsifiable. It seems weird to me to claim, as that article seems to do, that neural networks can’t reproduce human creativity, given that human brains are neural networks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![enipla](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/54ee81/32.png) [@enipla](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/enipla)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 11:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/208 "2024-08-17T11:48:35Z")

</div>

> [@Zyada](#):
>
> He was more likely to catch crabs though

Got it.

A long time ago, someone was talking about fishing or something. A co-worker chimed in “All I’ve ever caught was crabs” snickering ensues.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/209 "2024-08-17T18:36:48Z")

</div>

> [@markn\_1](#):
>
> It seems weird to me to claim, as that article seems to do, that neural networks can’t reproduce human creativity, given that human brains are neural networks.

The methods used to develop DLMs tend to result in largely static models. Humans seem to be naturally inquisitive (on average, some people are not) and acquire additional knowledge that gets integrated into their neural networks in ways that are largely missing from DLM constructs. In a way, we can say that these “AI” machines are the paragon of Dunning-Kruger: they are trained to work under the premise that the knowledge they possess is sufficient for their tasks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gordon\_G](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/3da27b/32.png) [@Gordon\_G](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gordon_G)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 6:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/210 "2024-08-17T18:39:28Z")

</div>

In 1919 the California Supreme Court struck down a law criminalizing “fellatio” because the state constitution required laws to be written in English.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zyada](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zyada/32/3028_2.png) [@Zyada](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zyada)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 7:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/211 "2024-08-17T19:23:45Z")

</div>

Human brains also have opinions and feelings, when neural networks don’t

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![markn\_1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/f9ae1b/32.png) [@markn\_1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/markn_1)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/212 "2024-08-17T19:31:29Z")

</div>

Again, a human brain IS a neutral network. An artificial neural net that was as complex as a human brain would have opinions and feelings like a brain does.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 7:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/213 "2024-08-17T19:42:48Z")

</div>

> [@eschereal](#):
>
> The methods used to develop DLMs tend to result in largely static models.

That’s mostly just a decision by the humans who create them, though. DLMs have a disturbing tendency to become sociopathic after some degree of training, so the creators deliberately freeze the model at various points and check that it’s not sociopathic before releasing it. But it wouldn’t be difficult to create something like ChatGPT that was constantly updating its model (i.e., learning).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pleonast](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pleonast/32/1183_2.png) [@Pleonast](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pleonast)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 9:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/214 "2024-08-17T21:45:52Z")

</div>

> [@Zyada](#):
>
> Human brains also have opinions and feelings, when neural networks don’t

I’d say that neural networks are nothing but opinions.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/elmer_j.fudd/32/1211_2.png) [@Elmer\_J.Fudd](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elmer_J.Fudd)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/215 "2024-08-17T21:51:33Z")

</div>

Today I learned about a singer who recorded five _one_-hit wonders.

[Tony Burroughs](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Burrows?wprov=sfti1#Solo) was lead singer on the following Top Ten hits for five different “one-hit wonder” bands:

1970: “My Baby Loves Lovin’” by White Plains  
1970: “Love Grows (Where My Rosemary Goes)” by Edison Lighthouse  
1970: “United We Stand” by Brotherhood of Man  
1970: “Gimme Dat Ding” by The Pipkins  
1974: “Beach Baby” by The First Class

In 1970, he appeared on _Top of the Pops_ so many times with different groups that the show banned him from any further appearances because they were getting too many letters from confused viewers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 11:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/216 "2024-08-17T23:00:05Z")

</div>

Perhaps. I don’t know how much of my volition (and volition is what seems difficult to program into DLMs) comes from biochemical processes that are completely alien to computers. We humans can want anything we wish to want, but we cannot _want_ to _want_. It just happens that most of us want this or that, probably not even knowing the reason, wanting nonetheless, but computers? How could they _want_? How do you teach that to a computer?

> [@Pleonast](#):
>
> I’d say that neural networks are nothing but opinions.

[Yeah, well, you know, this is just, like, your opinion, man…](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LGX8TbvGew&t=2s)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TriPolar](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tripolar/32/3008_2.png) [@TriPolar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TriPolar)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 11:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/217 "2024-08-17T23:14:24Z")

</div>

> [@Pardel-Lux](#):
>
> but we cannot _want_ to _want_.

We don’t need to want to want generally, but we can want to want if we want to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Pardel-Lux](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pardel-lux/32/20182_2.png) [@Pardel-Lux](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Pardel-Lux)\
**Post date:** [August 17, 2024, 11:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/218 "2024-08-17T23:16:40Z")

</div>

> [@TriPolar](#):
>
> we can want to want if we want to.

If you say so, but that is not what it feels like to me. Subjective, of course.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![eschereal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eschereal/32/18939_2.png) [@eschereal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/eschereal)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2024, 12:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/219 "2024-08-18T00:04:49Z")

</div>

One of the best lines,

> _Stonn, she is yours. After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing after all as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kferr](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/71e660/32.png) [@kferr](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kferr)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2024, 12:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785/220 "2024-08-18T12:05:13Z")

</div>

> [@fachverwirrt](#):
>
> My wife had a gynecologist named Dr. Hyman.

I used to have coworkers who used a gynecologist named Dr. Beaver.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/tell-us-an-interesting-random-fact-you-stumbled-across-part-2/1004785.md?page=12)
